User talk:Comm260 ncu

Welcome to Wikipedia, Comm260 ncu! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me}} Thank you, Rubbish computer! I have a question: How does this page move from draft status to "official" status? Comm260 ncu (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are asking for something like the Medal table, as laid out here. Or get back to me with a little more description. Trackinfo (talk) 02:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to repeat this and find multiple articles to use it, make your own template for the purpose. Start by figuring out the common data fields you expect to be able to find information on, consistently. The start with an existing template and install your own modifications. This essentially happens off line, since only you know what you are doing until you a) use it, or b) tell someone else (or ask for help). Column sort would be a single table, without needing a template. Trackinfo (talk) 07:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Med City Marathon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cascade Lake and Cascade Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comm260 ncu,

Thanks for creating Med City Marathon! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on the Med City Marathon, though I recommend adding more evidence (if there is any) that the event is notable. See WP:EVENT and WP:EXIST.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Doomsdayer520! Yes, it needs improvement. I currently have about 2,000 words and 10 sources for it that I'm working with in a sandbox. My previous pages are filled with hundreds of small edits, so these last two I've been working on outside of the page and plan to put in with one edit.

Part of my pause is the marathon finisher's table. While yes, everyone wants to know who took first in the marathon, the first through third places are all fast runners (especially to the lay person who doesn't run day in and day out). Are those people "notable?" Sure! They are all mentioned in the news articles, they are the ones standing on the podium, and they win the cash (or goods) offered from the race. So I'd like to list each for each year, but still have the table sortable (some third place winners are faster in one year than the winner is in another year). But that's tricky to do ... so I'm trying to figure out the technical coding intricacies of the table. Any tips?

So, to the question "Is it notable?" The answer is yes. The sources are on the way. If anyone wants to make an argument that a city's marathon isn't notable, they have a lot of work to do in the category "Marathons in the United States."

Thanks again!

Comm260 ncu (talk)

Thanks for creating Mankato Marathon.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the Mankato Marathon. As I said moments ago for a different article, I recommend adding more evidence (if there is any) that the event is notable. See WP:EVENT and WP:EXIST.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See above Comm260 ncu (talk)

An article you recently created, Yeshimebet Bifa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Thank you. I have been working with students to create pages and see what it takes to keep a page up on Wikipedia. Late reply here, but I'll have another student try this again with more sources/more neutral writing.Comm260 ncu (talk) 17:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page 2019 Dresden heist ‎, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 08:12, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Comm260 ncu. Thank you. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 15:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Comm260 ncu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Greetings @Moonythedwarf:!

After teaching an exciting class today in Comm260:Writing for Media, I found (unfortunately) that my account has been blocked for Sock puppetry. This block is mistaken.

I'm an educator, trying out an assignment for the second year. The students in my writing course first created annotated bibliographies of athletes, most of whom are marginalized and not included on Wikipedia due to language barriers and cultural barriers. In the class, we are working to practice principles of verification and clear, neutral writing. Another goal is for students to see Wikipedia as a collaborative text they can add to, even if it doesn't promote a financial interest (i.e. this is collaborative work for the public good).

All the students have written draft pages in Microsoft Word and are in the process of learning wiki-markup in order to draft strong, credible pages for Wikipedia entries. They are conscious of the rules of Wikipedia, but still learning, as they are students.

Your participation in this process (though unknowingly), may actually be helpful for students. I can explain in our next meeting tomorrow that some users have use of sockpuppet tools.

However, in order for our assignment to work, I'll need my account unblocked! Please recognize that one goal of mine is for college students to see Wikipedia as an active, growing document that they can contribute to—it is not a completed encyclopedia! This is a common conception for many students. "Wikipedia exists, and I can find all the answers there," they think, "but I can't be part of it because I'm not technical." Not true, students! Your contributions are valuable (if meeting the article creation criteria).

I'm also requesting that if any of the student's user names were blocked, that you also unblock their accounts. It would be a true defeat to this assignment (and Wikipedia's MO) if the very day they were all supposed to feel empowered to create that they instead felt they did not belong as a "technical" writer in collaborative editing spaces.

Thanks for your work on this website, and thanks for your considerate forthcoming reply.

Comm260 ncu (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. SQL^{Query me!} 18:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Comm260 ncu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Comm260 ncu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Greetings @Bbb23: ! After teaching an exciting class today in Comm260:Writing for Media, I found (unfortunately) that my account has been blocked for Sock puppetry. This block is mistaken. I'm an educator, trying out an assignment for the second year. The students in my writing course first created annotated bibliographies of athletes, most of whom are marginalized and not included on Wikipedia due to language barriers and cultural barriers. In the class, we are working to practice principles of verification and clear, neutral writing. Another goal is for students to see Wikipedia as a collaborative text they can add to, even if it doesn't promote a financial interest (i.e. this is collaborative work for the public good). All the students have written draft pages in Microsoft Word and are in the process of learning wiki-markup in order to draft strong, credible pages for Wikipedia entries. They are conscious of the rules of Wikipedia, but still learning, as they are students. Your participation in this process (though unknowingly), may actually be helpful for students. I can explain in our next meeting tomorrow that some users have use of sockpuppet tools. However, in order for our assignment to work, I'll need my account unblocked! Please recognize that one goal of mine is for college students to see Wikipedia as an active, growing document that they can contribute to—it is not a completed encyclopedia! This is a common conception for many students. "Wikipedia exists, and I can find all the answers there," they think, "but I can't be part of it because I'm not technical." Not true, students! Your contributions are valuable (if meeting the article creation criteria). I'm also requesting that if any of the student's user names were blocked, that you also unblock their accounts. It would be a true defeat to this assignment (and Wikipedia's MO) if the very day they were all supposed to feel empowered to create that they instead felt they did not belong as a "technical" writer in collaborative editing spaces. Thanks for your work on this website, and thanks for your considerate forthcoming reply. Comm260 ncu (talk) 17:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per below.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ooooh! I'm so sorry about this. I recommend you look into WikiEdu and WP:Wikiproject Athletics once unblocked. --moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 17:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comm260 ncu, I will unblock you and your students momentarily, but moonythedwarf is right. You should check in with WikiEdu. Hopefully, you have learned something as well, which is that you and your students need to communicate on their userpages that y'all are part of a school project. Such notices would have avoided not only the blocks but also the time spent by moonythedwarf and me in dealing with what appeared to be obvious socking. @Shalor (Wiki Ed): Can you assist please?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't mind the time waste very much, but Bbb23 is a Checkuser (given tools to identify sockpuppetry), and generally is quite busy. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 18:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not heard of WikiEdu—what a resource! This is wonderful @Moonythedwarf:! I'll take a look through that site and try contacting @Shalor (Wiki Ed):. I've been developing all my own curriculum, assignments and teaching strategy. I figured there were other professors doing the same, but I didn't realize there was an entire site dedicated to professor assistance.

I'm excited to pursue that more, but for now, I need to get my current grading completed, which means moving forward with the articles that were created today. I'll be making edits on those that were locked, relaying the information to the students, and reviewing their second articles (coming out next week).

This is a large ecosystem, and although I've been editing on here for more than a year now, some things still perplex me. Where did you learn your way around the Wikipedia map, Moonythedwarf? Did you have a group of people you met with in person? Did you learn it through the WikiEdu and other students? Or did you do the crash course of trying and trying again? Thanks for the release, I'll get back to it (checks watch) It'll be a long night! Comm260 ncu (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Comm260[reply]

Comm260 ncu, ..Glad I decided to check my notifications one last time before going to bed. I'm fixing to go on a mental-health related break from editing for a few days (Things did somehow get significantly better last minute, with a bit of counseling from a good friend, but I'm taking the break anyways, as it'd still be helpful).

I went through the crash course, yes. Altho, I will admit, i'm still not much of an editor, and the majority of my time is instead hunting vandalism, sockpuppetry, and undisclosed paid editing. I'm much more productive at that than anything else. I do sometimes edit technology related articles, often Motorola semiconductor products.

I will not be in contact (unless something unusual happens) for the next few days, so I recommend either communicating with the WikiEdu team, or other administrators. I know Oshwah is usually happy to help when they're around. --moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 02:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I replied on your talk page. Comm260 ncu (talk) 04:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can you contact us at contactwikiedu.org? Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Augustus Mbusya Kavutu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augustus Mbusya Kavutu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabriela Andersen-Schiess, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minnesota Golden Gophers football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Peebles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bemidji Blue Ox Marathon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mankato, Minnesota, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comm260 ncu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary Akor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mankato Marathon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cross country and Hubbard House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the great work you did on the Mankato Marathon article! It is one that I was looking to return to Wikipedia to update since the stub was saddeningly short. It was a pleasant surprise to be informed recently that you made such an improvement to the article last week. I helped a connection of mine who was unfamiliar with Wikipedia make some updates. Regarding Bongers not being involved, great update on the consistency and it would probably be worth adding in some history of the involvement and the change. Unfortunately, I'm really struggling to find third party sources on this one. I found this page on the Mankato Marathon site that lists only Visit Mankato and the Mankato Sports Commission as owners. I also found this 2018 Annual Report published by Greater Mankato Growth that announces the purchase, but again, those are both first party sources.  Ryan Vesey 01:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On an unrelated note, I realized you had an interaction with Bbb23 early last year. I'm glad everything was cleared up well. I used to have some great interactions with him back when I was an active editor and supported his RFA. Sorry you had to deal with the block, but I'm glad things were cleared up well. Ryan Vesey 01:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly, Ryan! Hopefully the page grows a little more to become rock solid as a running and local resource. Yes, things worked out with Bbb23 and I did get connected with WikiEdu to set up courses and have students create through the education portal. It is a pretty amazing resource, and I'm excited to meet more professors who are creating assignments there.

It's so awesome to hear that you're working with WikiEdu. I think there are such great opportunities for students to edit Wikipedia as they learn cool new things in class. Some of my favorite articles are ones like Botik of Peter the Great where I learned about the topic, became interested, and said "everyone needs to know about this". Unfortunately there's a lot that never got completed like User:Ryan Vesey/Jassini and the rest of the articles linked on my userpage. Hopefully I can some day return to Wikipedia to finish them or at least publish the stubworthy ones as stubs. Ryan Vesey 22:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is a fascinating article, Ryan Vesey. Great work! You should add it to the List of museum ships and the List of oldest surviving ships. Comm260 ncu (talk) 01:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota-marathon-logos—2019—ely.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota-marathon-logos—2019—grandmas.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota-marathon-logos—2019—lake-wobegon-trail-marathon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota-marathon-logos—2019—mankato.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota-marathon-logos—2019—med-city.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Run for the Lakes Marathon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run for the Lakes Marathon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 22:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota-marathon-logos—2019—run-for-the-lakes.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Detroit Free Press Marathon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 5K.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joseph Kamau. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 13:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Kamau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comm260 ncu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary Akor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yes, other students worked on this at a separate draft page. Much appreciated! Comm260 ncu (talk) 01:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Reed Fischer. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]