User talk:Colin Nish

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Colin Nish without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there which part did I change that you don’t agree with Colin Nish (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're moving large chunks of referenced material from the article—particularly anything with a negative tone about Nish. —C.Fred (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there yes I took away the negative stuff that I don’t believe to be true Colin Nish (talk) 21:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter what editors believe. If it's backed up by reliable sources, it stays in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That said, there was unsourced commentary about his performance at Kilmarnock; I just removed that from the article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What’s the reliable source? Colin Nish (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Colin Nish", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it gives the appearance that you are Colin Nish; usernames that impersonate notable people are not allowed. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn’t Colin Nish be a reliable source Colin Nish (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. Self-published sources are of limited use. They can be used for some biographical data, but there's too much risk that they aren't written neutrally. —C.Fred (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you concentrate on negativity it would be good in future if it wasn’t so negative as a lot of the wording is actually not true Colin Nish (talk) 21:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you look in to number 26 please Colin Nish (talk) 22:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. The speculation about the reason for his departure has been removed; all the article says is that he left. —C.Fred (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fred Colin Nish (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you also look ok at number 2 , a contract not renewed isn’t terminated Colin Nish (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]