User talk:Colchester121891

Welcome!

Hello, Colchester121891, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Turkish-Lebanese relations, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Turkish-Lebanese relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

POV-y article with no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Armenia-Pakistan relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, POV-y article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Armenia-Pakistan relations has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When removing a prod you have to either have corrected the problem, or explain why you find the prod inappropriate. Since you've done nothing to correct the problem, why do you feel the prod doesn't apply? Ironholds (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have again removed a prod without an explanation. I am nominating the articles for deletion under WP:AFD. Ironholds (talk) 18:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Palestine–Turkey relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

POV-y and unreferenced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 18:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Palestine–Turkey relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestine–Turkey relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 18:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Turkish-Lebanese relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish-Lebanese relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 18:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Bryan Abrams, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Abrams. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Equazcion (talk) 09:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pirate^Argh!!1! 02:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Panther in Spanish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pirate^Argh!!1! 02:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Panther in Spanish has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

implausible redirect

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pirate^Argh!!1! 02:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Saw you made a contribution, adding prog rock genre, that was quickly reverted. I just wanted to encourage you to go to the talk page and defend you edit. Call this edit war prevention. --Leodmacleod (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to undo you, but that source just doesn't meet the standards for reliable sources. Take a look over the standards. I'm sure you can find something better out there. --Leodmacleod (talk) 05:36, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked out your recent contributions and have had to reverse some. I think it might be beneficial for you to read up on Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy as well. --Leodmacleod (talk) 06:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Colchester121891! I have reverted this edit to the article, as the source given is not only not acceptable, but does not support the claim of progressive rock. I notice that you had made the same edit less than a month ago, and the explanation as to why this is not acceptable according to WP:RS was explained to you. Waiting weeks or months between re-insertion of the same contested material is not advisable. If you have a reliable source that backs up your claim, by all means utilize it. Please refrain from inserting the same unsourced material for a third time. Thank you, and Happy Editing! Doc9871 (talk) 21:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's soooo obvious. (I wonder why I didn't think of it!) Well done. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hughstan Schlicker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable crime victim. WP:VICTIM

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clubmarx (talk) 01:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Phil Collins, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 02:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Cassie Steele, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Colchester121891 - thanks for your edits to articles on drummers. Trouble is that the link you are providing as a reference is that of a blog, and as such is not a reliable enough source for Wikipedia. I used it myself once, and had to undo. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 15:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing's changed in the past month; that blog is still not a reliable source. Please stop putting it in articles. Cheers. Radiopathy •talk• 23:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to discuss your use of sources in articles and found warnings going back to January regarding your use of sources. Not seeing where you've answered on your talk page I looked at your contributions and it appears that you've never posted to any talk page. Seriously, this cannot continue. I see a lot of gnomish work in your contributions and would like to see more of the same positive effort, but if you continue adding non-reliable sources or misquoting information it could lead to problems for you. Many editors have offered you their advice and their help; do yourself a favor and take them up on it. Please take more care in your work and avoid citing sources until you've acquainted yourself with WP:Reliable sources. Regards Tiderolls 21:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Bitches Brew has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. If you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the guidelines on citing sources and the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Wiki libs (talk) 03:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit at Faran Tahir, please do not add religious, ethnic, or descent categories to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:EGRS/WP:BLPCAT for additional information. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edit ([1]) at Geddy Lee, please take the time to review Wikipedia's instructions for citing sources at WP:INCITE. Also, since the content you added doesn't relate directly to Geddy Lee's bass guitar equipment, I encourage you to consider a better place in the article for incorporating the information you added. In the meantime I've relocated it to the article's Discussion page.—Biosketch (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.--John (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Franklin Graham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Soul jazz appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. I'm not sure if you meant to do this, but you added Wes Montgomery to a list of organists. Gyrofrog (talk) 04:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Punk blues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Saddhiyama (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Man Who Sold the World (album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Heavier Things, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Righty (disambiguation), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Left hand and Lefty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. Colchester121891, thanks for creating Righty (disambiguation)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page, it looks great. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes,

Ana (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Strange Days. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I call the big one bitey 23:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bianca Lawson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Piers Morgan, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lake Bluff High School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Brambleclawx 02:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Beckel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood#8 children by 6 women. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Roccodrift. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Dana Rohrabacher have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Roccodrift (talk) 22:02, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Al Franken, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 00:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kurt Cobain. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walgren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bill Maher may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [{Category:Criticism of Judaism]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pamela Geller, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christine Rousselle has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cult of Green (talk) 03:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Christine Rousselle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 12:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Transcendence. Your recent edit to the page Mitch McConnell appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Transcendence (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Cuban American does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• RE William Peter Blatty: Please do not use the mainspace for test editing or as a WP:SANDBOX, as you did with the Blatty article. Quis separabit? 04:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colin Powell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. An edit that you recently made to Cuban American seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please don't tamper with ethnic group infobox galleries without discussion. It simply isn't constructive. Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Evan Matthew Cohen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject does not notability guidelines WP:ENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingstoken (talk) 00:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Classical blues. Since you had some involvement with the Classical blues redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hardcore pop. Since you had some involvement with the Hardcore pop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect See Something, Say Something Act of 2011. Since you had some involvement with the See Something, Say Something Act of 2011 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 17:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conservative Islam. Since you had some involvement with the Conservative Islam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liberal constitutionalism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 9#Liberal constitutionalism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t · c) buidhe 10:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian-American culture in Washington (state) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi Zionists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]