User talk:Chillabit

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Chillabit! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now you have a blue talk page. :) S0091 (talk) 18:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @S0091 Thank you for the welcome, cookies, and tips! I was in fact finding my way around fairly OK, but the stuff you posted here did help me a little -- I wouldn't have found the Task Center for quite a while longer if you hadn't shown me that, I don't think, and I deorphaned or gave categories to quite a few pages when I was starting out because of that (although I've technically been here a couple years). Wasn't sure how to reply here, originally. Thank you! Chillabit (talk) 21:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Good to hear, Chillabit. There's always tons to learn around here and only a million different places to go to find things. Hope you have a happy safe New Year! :) S0091 (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 6th, 11am-1pm E.S.T: Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE

Hello User:Chillabit! You are invited to join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 3rd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - Saturday, Feb 6th, 2021 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how information on wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19. We'd love to hear if you have any ideas. If you can not attend, please feel free to comment on my talk page, or here, or on the event page. Saturday February 6 Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki). 11:00am - 1:00 pm E.S.T online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth G. Watson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 13:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 October 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Halyna Hutchins, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 05:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for expanding this article! In fact, you expanded it sufficiently for it to be featured on the main page in WP:DYK. (t · c) buidhe 05:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well buidhe, I'm thrilled by the idea, which motivated me to build an infobox and reception section in case it does come to fruition. However, I'm very inexperienced with DYK, although I did just read the WP:DYK page. Also, I don't quickly spot any amazing hooks at Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe. The best I can think of is maybe shortening or altering the mention of the "three N's" ("nature, the nation, and normality"), as described by the authors, as a part of the anti-gender movement. This could be novel enough to hook readers, I also know it's not likely to be legitimately challenged because it's mentioned at least two times in the book's text. It is also somewhat concise. Though it doesn't strike me as an amazing hook (just my opinion), I think it could be a good one. What do you think? --Chillabit (talk) 12:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that seems like a great idea for a hook! Another could be tying into gender as an "empty signifier". (t · c) buidhe 12:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your edits at Autism and LGBT identities! —AFreshStart (talk) 20:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Second Shelf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ^{+ c} 04:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, with regards to this comment and the one you made previously, out of curiosity have you privately let those editors know that they're being discussed on that forum? I'm sure the one who has been doxxed should know, so they can take any reasonable precautions given the nature of the site. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The two I originally mentioned are well aware, including the one whose address was posted — I heard about it through these two and saw the threads later. Chillabit (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please pass this info (along with any others in the future) to T&S so that they can assess the situation. If you don't want to contact these users directly, please email ArbCom so that we can do so. (please ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 07:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: I told T&S. I guess they ought to know. Chillabit (talk) 01:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Primefac (talk) 09:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have just posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to ask for fixes to the page about Temu (company) that should address the final issues raised in a flag for the page. I have a conflict of interest as an employee of Temu. I want to follow the correct process for COI users. Since you are a member of the WikiProject for Internet Culture, which is relevant to the page, I thought you possibly be interested in reviewing the proposal. Temu’s app has been the most downloaded phone app in the United States in recent months. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 (talk) 03:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was offline for quite a while. I probably wouldn't have been up for this either way personally, but hope you got it figured out. Chillabit (talk) 19:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]