User talk:Lionel Messi Lover

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

The reference provided by you is unreliable since it quotes an opinion by a politician (without providing any details) and does not mention the number 174 anywhere. Moreover it clearly states that government was formed with support of 169 MLAs, as provided in the article. Also there is a clearly written note in Maharashtra Legislative Assembly which asks not to make changes to party totals without making corresponding edits to the section "Members of Legislative Assembly" (which you are not adhering to). Also note that party colors are based on community wide consensus and should not be changed without reaching a consensus on the same. Dhruv edits (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Maharashtra Legislative Council, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chennai Super Kings Lover,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 2026 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at 2021 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller talk 12:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you made this edit? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I couldn't find Tipu Sultan in the source Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This came to my attention here. When someone asserts that a source you're using does not state what you're claiming it does, what you then need to do, what is your WP:BURDEN, is to prove that it does — on the talk page, post an excerpt of the proof. So, an objection of that nature concerning your reliance on a source for Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar) (which apparently has no abbreviation) as "far right" (diff), that requires the proof I speak of above (pertinent excepts).

The argument could also be made that this one single source, even if it does say that, is not enough to substantiate that ("far right") claim (I have no idea). But one thing at a time. The point, though, is that failure to follow BURDEN while continuing to edit war is likely to result in sanctions under the WP:ARBIND sanctions regime (see thread above this one for details). Thank you. El_C 12:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@El C This appears to be a failure to communicate. @Chennai Super Kings Lover Please check and reply on Talk:Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar). Join the discussion. Venkat TL (talk) 14:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2027 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(t · c) buidhe 23:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to the article Maharashtra Legislative Assembly. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 06:33, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chennai Super Kings Lover! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Maharashtra Legislative Assembly several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 06:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 07:26, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude talk 05:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 06:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:REFVISUAL and follow. Venkat TL (talk) 07:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rashtriya Janata Dal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahagathbandhan (Bihar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Next Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jana Sena Party. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 15th Rajasthan Assembly, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 10:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding leaders on infobox of election pages is case specific, not hard and fast rule. CM candidate or the face of party in that state is added based on consensus at that time, which should not be changed after the election. For elections that are further away, state president is added until a CM candidate is announced or there is a prominent face of the party for that election. For 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, Priyanka Gandhi was the face of the party in the state, and was added to the infobox for the same reason. Do not undertake edit warring. Dhruv edits (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert back to your preferred version on 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election until a consensus has been achieved for the same. Continued disruptive editing and edit warring may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But You Said that State President is leader in infobox Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 12:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Like I have said above, it's case specific, there is no fixed rule. For elections that are more than 2-3 months away, we don't know definitely who CM candidate/ party face will be (except incumbent CM), that's why state Presidents are added. When CM candidate is announced, state president will be replaced by that candidate. Dhruv edits (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please repharse your edit summary, Special:Diff/1114832748. It currently appears that you are trolling me.

Just saying

"There is no "Other" bench in the Assembly. There are Treasury (Government) benches and everyone else is in Opposition bench. "

or

"There is no "Other" bench in the Assembly."

is sufficient, and gives the idea to the page readers. Please see WP:EDITSUMMARY for more guidelines on how to write edit summary. Venkat TL (talk) 17:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,Sir Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,Sir I'm had mentioned your name as people respect you as senior editor and will not revert back the edits Thank You 🙂 Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LoL, no I am not senior, If you ever need help from senior editors you should post on WT:POI. I also post there regularly. Venkat TL (talk) 15:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Akshaypatill (talk) 11:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you are interested, please join the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu mythological and devotional cinema. 2409:4073:4D81:8F4:78AC:BD2E:F197:F02E (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Assam Legislative Assembly. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gana Suraksha Party. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Bharat Rashtra Samithi, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. It is clear that you ignored my reason for reverting your edit. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gana Suraksha Party, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There has been an update in Lok Sabha seats. Due to stay order by SC, Outer Manipur Lok Sabha constituency will stay with NPF. New tally is 302 Lok sabha seats for BJP and 1 for NPF. I have made the correction at Lok Sabha and List of members of the 17th Lok Sabha. Please make this change on all other pages that have BJP and NPF Lok Sabha seats. Add this reference only in the edit summary, no need to add this in the articles. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your investigation! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 18:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Is Diamond Leveler (talk · contribs) your second account? If so, you need to read WP:SOCK and determine if it is a valid alternate account WP:SOCKLEGIT and also declare it on your userpage. If it is created for malicious reasons, it is not allowed. Please respond to this query — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't knew the WP:SOCK policy and I will it as soon as possible Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 12:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chennai Super Kings, please retain this message here until you have actioned it. What do you mean by I will it as soon as possible? You will what? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems there is yet another account Settings gujrti (talk · contribs). Are you ever going to disclose your alternate accounts? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry for the inconveniences as I mistakenly logged in with that account while logging in at Wikimedia Commons

  I will soon disclose that account

  ThanK You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 13:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the map of legislative assembly goverments. [1] should be the map used everywhere and the same should be updated when there is change in government. This map contains proper summary and explanation. Dhruv edits (talk) 07:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover: Please stop adding images as you did multiple times. The images you uploaded disregard copyright. Wretchskull (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover As Lok Sabha election is national level election, hence important national alliances should be added to infobox of Lok Sabha elections in various states. That is why, I added BJP (NDA), INC (UPA) and CPIM (Left Front) in infobox of Bihar and Kerala in different order despite NDA and Left Front not scoring good in previous elections of Kerala and Bihar respectively. IUML is part of UPA, so I think we should not add it in infobox, we should add one party from each alliance now. RLJP and LJP (RV) were not present in last election in Bihar, one party LJP was present. So we should remove them from Bihar infobox as it will be wrong to mention their last election seats. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover As it is lok sabha election, we should add national leaders as you did in Bihar by adding Narendra Modi to BJP. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, But in Indian elections at Wikipedia Infobox the parties are added on the basis of vote % or seats in last election

Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover The citation given by Firdos asharf does not say that INC is major party. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Chennai super King lover stop spreading the idea one political group you does not know the ground reality of Tripura Congress is now become a major party in Tripura you can see the last 2019 election result both lok sabha seat Congress was on 2nd position — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firdos ashraf (talk • contribs) 13:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130854049

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130861641

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130883350

More sources of vandalism by User: Firdos ashraf Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism

Is an exception for three revert rule as per rule number 4 Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My edit war is exception

1. Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.

User: Firdos ashraf has continuously vandalising page 2023 Tripura Legislative Assembly election by unsourced and Unexplained edits after several warning see [4] [5] Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130883350%EF%BF%BC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130861641

More Vandalism reference Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rajya Sabha. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the inconveniences but the [[User:SharadSHRD7]] was continuously vandalising page by making new rules and I told him to stop the edit war but he kept reverting my sourced edits Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SharadSHRD7 has again started edit war even though I have sourced I revert it few times but he reverted it again.

So, I request to block this user to avoid such disturbance

Thank You , @User: Chennai Super Kings Lover Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As articles of next Indian general elections in many states are being formed in Wikipedia, I am adding those parties in next Indian general election page. The party which will not be part of any alliance will be removed or be added to others section at the advent of election or confirmation of not being in alliance. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://sigma.toolforge.org/editorinteract.py?users=Prof+Shinde&users=Politics+of+Maharashtra&users=Crompton+editz&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki Shadow4dark (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I added the link of official facebook page of CPIM Tripura to cite a statement : In 2022, many party workers of BJP, IPFT and TIPRA joined CPIM. But an editor removed them. Link of reliable facebook page has already been added in 2022 Gujarat election. Can I add the statement again? What do you think? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ready to help against the biased edits made by user SharadSHRD7. I think he is probably aligned with AIADMK.

I think adding regional alliances in 2024 Lok Sabha election will give wrong estimation. Such date many regional parties are adding with NDA on national level and Jharkhand Mukti Morcha are in UPA on national level where JDU and RJD and others are not part of UPA at national level. There can be numerous regional alliances, if we start to add all alliances, the list will be too long. User SharadSHRD was trying to push up AITC first adding federal front (which was a proposed alliance in 2019 but could not materialize) and then adding AITC to infobox. He is imposing his edits over others and if anyone is against him, he is complaining against that user to the administrators. Actually no party in India is part of any alliance in all the states where it has presence. For example, NPP contested against BJP in Arunachal Pradesh. SO we should as Left Front in alliances section. There are many important parties which are not being added in this list. So we should add the parties and alliances like this :

Political alliances

With the exception of 2014, no single party has won the majority of seats in the Lok Sabha since 1984, and therefore, forming alliances is the norm in Indian elections.

There were three main national pre-poll alliances. They are the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) headed by the BJP, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) headed by the INC, Left Democratic Front of Communist-leaning parties. Given the volatile nature of coalition politics in India, alliances may change during and after the election.

The INC did not form alliances in states where it is in direct contest with the BJP. These states include Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh. Parties of UPA contest election being part of UDF, SPA, MGB (Bihar), MVA.

In 23rd Party Congress of Communist Party of India (Marxist) at Kannur in the state of Kerala, the final draft of the party's political resolution was prepared and it gave thrust on increasing the independent strength of CPI(M) and on empowering the Left parties as an third alternative without being part of Congress alliance nationally.^[1] CPIM general secretary Sitaram Yechury and the delegates of the party congress gave final seal for the formation of Left Democratic Front in national level to unseat BJP from the central government.^[2][3] On 11 January 2023, Sitaram Yechury announced their intension to form Left Democratic Front in a press meeting in Tripura.^[4]

Political parties

More than __ (value) parties contested in these elections. Most of them were small with regional appeal. The main parties are the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress (INC).— Preceding unsigned comment added by XYZ 250706 (talk • contribs)

@XYZ 250706:: There won't be numerous alliances because minor parties (without national/state party status) and state parties which don't win any seat in past election/don't have any seat in current Lok Sabha, will not be added. If you want to discuss about this topic, please comment in the talk page of specific article to pave way for more users to engage in your discussion. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Please do something to stop User:SharadSHRD's imposing edits over others. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User SharadSHRD is continuosly adding regional alliances. I said that we can add the name of regional alliances like SPA, MGB (Bihar), MVA, UDF under UPA. But he is adding them continuously. User: AS Sayyad also reverted his edits. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also added introduction to parties and alliances section of Next Indian General election but he deleted it. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you say are ^{[5][6][7][8][9][10]} there citation sufficient for adding Left Democratic Front in that page? XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, from my pov it is sufficient as per [[WP: Reliable]] Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So pls revert his edits on that page and restore last good version by me. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Next_Indian_general_election&oldid=1134753941) this edit contains information which will meet opinions of all editors. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added LDF he reverted that. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706 (talk · contribs)

The section of Parties and Alliance is currently blanked due to dispute,So I can't revert it back Chennai Super Kings Lover(talk) @XYZ 250706, "Tell me how can I help you!"Chennai Super Kings Lover(talk)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover User Sharad SHRD7 is again started disruptions and he is trying to delete an article written by me : Alliances formed by left-wing parties in the states of India. Wikipedia reviewer Onel 2569 (I forgot the exact name) previously said me to add more citations to the page and I added that and then he said nothing against that page. Please say your opinion in that page. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I request you to join the AfD discussion about the article named "Alliances formed by left-wing parties in the states of India". Thank you. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I came to know that NCP contested against INC in Katihar Lok Sabha constituency, Lakshadweep Lok Sabha constituency, Outer Manipur Lok Sabha constituency in 2019 and UP election in 2022. On the other hand, Shiv Sena contested against INC in 2021 Dadra and Nagar Haveli Lok Sabha constituency bye election and 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election. MNF, NDPP, NPP, NPF contested against BJP in some seats in 2019. I doubt they can be called national level member of UPA and NDA. What do your think? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, NCP and Shiv Sena contested against UPA in 2022 Goa election also. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JMM contested against INC in Bihar and WB in 2019. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In constituency level, allies contest against each other some times, but what matters is the state or national level election where they mostly contest with alliance,Hope your confusion is over, Thank You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

There is something wrong with your signature. Please fix that immediately — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Chennai Super Kings Lover According to ECI website of candidate affidavit, the name is Tipra Motha Party. Please fix the template with TMP (Tipra Motha Party). XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The template : Party name with color XYZ 250706 14:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706:DoneChennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover ^[11] This citation says that CPIM general secretary has announced that his party will ally with SP in UP. It is not speculation. And if you say about the name of the alliance, the name is derived from ^[12]. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But CPIM is not major party in Uttar Pradesh, Therefore The Alliance name, I couldn't found in the article, hence, Alliance should be renamed as SP+Left Front Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

Yes CPIM is not major party in UP. But Left and Democratic Front is not only of CPIM, many sources are saying this (name is not confirmed) is the alliance of left, secular and Democratic parties to isolate and defeat the BJP. DP is also left wing and Democratic Party as per ideology. XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I request you to join the discussion Using Template:Infobox legislative election until the announcement of election results and to give your neutral opinion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your edit on Mizoram Legislative Assembly is seems to be incorrect as ZPM still has 6 seats. See here. Try not to use assembly pages as reference since they are rarely updated. Dhruv edits (talk) 05:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I request you to join the discussions Talk:Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena#Shiv Sena and Template:Infobox legislative election and put your valuable neutral opinion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 03:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please put your valuable neutral opinion in Template:Infobox legislative election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to the page aforementioned have dragged my concerns regarding the numbers you put on the page, those numbers basically exceed the total number of seats in that house. Kindly refer to the page: http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/member-list-council.pdf. This is the latest version of the list of members published by the Maharastra Legislative Council for the ongoing budget session. Hope you have better time reading that file by scrolling down to the last page. Regards. Wiki Master World (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See @Wiki Master World, In the page of Mizoram Legislative Assembly, when I added party seats on their official website point of view,refer[6] , @User: Dhruv edits, senior Wikipedia editor reverted it [7] stating that though Official website refer it as update or 2023 latest, it is not true, because as you know government works are too slow in India, this pdf which you are referring was same before latest mlc election, the number of parties are increased as MVA won 3 seats and BJP won 1.^[13] Hope your doubt is clear. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

But the numbers you put still don't add up to 78, what sorcery is this? Wiki Master World (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See @Wiki Master World,This is because a large number of seats in Maharashtra Legislative Council are vacant because of 2022 Maharashtra political crisis, soon after 1-2 years the seats will be filled up by coming MLC elections, Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover ^[14] this citation directly or indirectly says that UPA was the alliance led by Congress with the help of like-minded parties from 2004 to 2014 and Congress wants to rejuvenate the UPA model for 2024 election. Should we keep UPA as existing alliance or not? Besides, regional parties having alliance or seat-sharing with congress in the state does not mean that they are part of UPA. Please give your valuable opinion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although it is an opinion, Mamata Banerjee also said that UPA does not exist now. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706, This source^[15] clearly states that soon after Mamata Banerjee said , some opposition parties part of UPA organised meeting to strength UPA, Mamata Banerjee said so because of bad performance of UPA in recent elections, refer:United Progressive Alliance#Timeline of the UPA and other regional alliances formed by the Congress Party , The source you provided says that Congress want to re model UPA form of governance in 2004, 2009. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Can you please form an article of the alliance led by Samajwadi Party in UP elections? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @XYZ 250706, currently my exam is coming and I'm currently

Soon In Last week of March, I will research on the topic and make an article.

Thank You, Sorry for inconvenience! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Ok, no problem. Are you also a school student? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I have created an article Gathbandhan (Uttar Pradesh) for using now. You can update, edit and improve article after the completion of your exams. Thank you. XYZ 250706 (talk) 09:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706, Done✅,Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@XYZ 250706 No, I am currently doing my bachelor's on Political Sciences and History of Modern India. Thank You!

Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover One of your source says that Pawar has said MVA should fight together. 'Should' does not mean 'will'. The other source does not say about Maharashtra election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706::But This source:https://theprint.in/india/we-accept-their-leadership-says-sharad-pawar-on-kharges-remark-that-cong-led-alliance-will-come-to-power/1390284/ says that Sharad Pawar will accept Congress leadership , so it is common senses that if they will contest together in India ,they will contest under UPA in Maharashtra too. Thanking You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover West Bengal Legislative Assembly, Rajasthan Legislative Assembly etc contain others section. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User:XYZ 250706, These may be done by some IPs and will be corrected due to confusion but I mentioned statement of Senior Editor User: Venkat TL here [8] stating that few months back there are government and opposition branch in a Legislature. Thank You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover What should we do with infobox legislative election in 2024 Lok Sabha election article? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC) @XYZ 250706, Regarding the 2024 article , we should complain to administrator as the User: Number 57 is admin and he have more rights than us! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Then please try. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just noticed a person with the following IP Address: 59.153.2.57, has been vandalizing the page mentioned in the above subject. He added BJP as the ruling party of Bihar, which isn't true. I reversed the IP edits with appropriate reasons. Additionally, I checked this guy's edit history both on the page and on the IP account, he has a long history of vandalizing pages, especially this one. It is my humble request that you monitor this page for a few days, he might do it again, I am not that active on this platform. Thank you Lord Elzai (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will monitor it for few days, ThanK You.!

[[User: Chennai Super Kings Lover|<b style="color: Green;">Chennai Super Kings Lover</b>]] ([[User talk: Chennai Super Kings Lover|talk]]) Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've notified you earlier on 27 January 2023 that there's something wrong with your signature and asked to you to rectify it. You are not dating your comments [9]. You must add date/timestamp on talk pages. Please read Wikipedia:Signatures for help regarding custom signatures among others — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover National parties in India have some extra advantage over other parties. They can user their particular symbol all over India and the government provides land or a building for the National parties to erect their party headquarters. I think national parties in India can be regarded as major parties for Lok Sabha election. Besides if you look at the national parties, all parties (Except NPP) have national significance. Shouldn't we add them in the infobox for 2024 Lok Sabha election? XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover As of now there is no political position of Bahujan Samaj Party in Wikipedia. Can you please give any source of information regarding its political position as in List of political parties in India it is only national party having no written political position. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706, I couldn't find any source about BSP's political position, but in Wikipedia Bahujan Samaj Party#Views there it is said that BSP believes in Social Transformation which is characteristics of Left Wing, So I should say that we should put it in Left Wing or Centre-Left position. Kindly share your views. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Is there any rule of ECI that a major party for election should have more than 5% votes? You wrote in your edit in 2023 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election : But as per eci rules for major party 5% vote percentage is needed and RPI(A) won above it https://results.eci.gov.in/ResultAcGenMar2023/partywiseresult-S17.htm?st=S17. [N.B.: You wrote RPI(A) instead of LJP(RV) by mistake] Can you give source for it? XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706! User:Dhruv edits few months back told me that 5% vote share party is added as if all parties winning seat would be added then the Infobox would be too long, RPI (A) won 3%+ vote share 2023 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election#Results, so I had not added them in Infobox. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Hi, your recent additions [10] are maybe not required; for I belief that images representational and popular to the particular state should be inserted, which also has some significance with historical background. Both Ajan peer dargarh and Sukapha khestra are not specifically notable to be held in frontispiece, also the image quality and adjustments are not right. ComparingQuantities (talk) 16:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, an account named Shaan Sengupta has been vandalizing pages of various legislative assemblies like Bihar and Maharashtra..he is placing the whole NCP under the NDA , which isn't the case. Kindly look into the matter.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Elzai (talk • contribs) 11:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next Indian general election in Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azam Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover The opposition alliance has not yet taken the full shape. Some members may go out. CPIM leaders (both national and state level) and Congress leaders (West Bengal and Northeast units) have discarded alliance with TMC. [11][12][13][14]. Some Congress leaders have also given threat to their high command that they will leave the party if alliance with TMC is formed in WB. Besides LDF and UDF alliance is not possible in Kerala. One cannot deny that many a member of this new alliance INDIA will contest against each other in many constituencies in different states. So I think we should not add INDIA alliance in Next Indian general election now and it should be added after confirmation of seat sharing formula and keep the alliance article as draft for now. XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As INDIA has announced to contest 2024 Polls together.So we should not remove it now if in near future some parties may leave it will updated accordingly.

Thank You✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover And the Bengal - Kerala - Northeast issue? XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Besides Congress Lok Sabha leader and WB state president Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury also discarded alliance with TMC. XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706, On this issue, we have to wait for the committee formed to survey the seat sharing finalised in the next meeting in Mumbai, to give the report on if the alliance will contest in all parts of India or will contest state wise! Though Adhir Ranjan Choudhary refused alliance with TMC before meeting but now Congress President, Mr Mallikarjun Kharge has said that all members of INDIA will contest together, and these statements are contradictory, so we have to wait till the next meeting in Mumbai for clearity.

Thank You✨

@Chennai Super Kings Lover

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mizo National Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Right-wing nationalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:National People's Party (India) logo.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 10:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I couldn't find a better source.

Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 11:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I told you not to use ref tags in talk pages. When providing a link use the method I have used in that guy's talk page. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chennai Super Kings Lover,

Thank you for creating Next Indian general election in Mizoram.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi! Thanks for creating this article. It's good on the whole, but could use a little bit more prose and references from additional sources. It seems that sources could be used related to INC and MNF. Have a great day!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TartarTorte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TartarTorte 13:18, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding WikiProject Indian Politics

Hi please don't modify Wikiprojects template userboxes as you did at Template:User Indian politics They are made as per a standard.

Why are you changing my templates. I made Template:User Akhand Bharat you changed its content and moved it to Template:User Hindu Akhand Bharat. How is it that. It just mentions user want Akhand Bharat. Nowhere it is mentioned as Hindu Akhand Bharat. Why did you change it on your own without discussing. You want to depict something the way you want. It didn't exist. I created it. You create one for yourself. Don't change what I have made for me. You can make other as Template:User Akhand Bharat 1 or whatever name you want. Secondly, Template:User Hindu was a redirect to other template. I made it. People are using it. Noone has made any objection yet. Only you are the one to make it. I removed Hindutva after I agreed to your point. But everything wont to be done according to how you want. Sanatan is the other name of Hinduism. Reformists are not part of Sanatana. Donot change my templates without discussing and notifying. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 09:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The flag you are using it is mentioned that it's of so called Hindu Rashtra Akhand Bharat.

Cite:https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/rkj1tv/flag_of_hindu_rashtra_akhand_bharat/

That's why I named it Hindu Akhand Bharat, If you truly use Only Akhand Bharat, you should use Indian Flag instead.

And secondly I was confused about Sanantan and Hinduism.

Thank You✨ Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We can't add India Flag. It is the property of our nation. Akhand Bharat is not a reality yet on ground. So better to use the imaginary flag. And regarding Hindu template thats why I told you. Please discuss before making changes in future. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Donot remove saffron colour from Akhand Bharat template. I have removed the flag. Amd donot change the subject. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect SP+ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § SP+ until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw that you reverted the edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IShowSpeed&oldid=1181429401) on IShowSpeed that I made regarding Watkins meeting Daler Mehndi on his visit to India. I was confused on why you said that it was a sock puppet edit, because I do not have any other accounts. This is my only Wikipedia account. Reev132 (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there was other sock account which I thought had made this edit.

I have reinstated your edits.

And sorry for inconvenience.

Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 02:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Messi Lover you initially declared your alternative accounts but from what I can see in the current version only Template:User alternative account is there which doesn't reveals the alternative accounts. I would suggest you put {{User alternative account name|Diamond Leveler|(other accounts names)}} on userpage of this account and {{User alternative account|Lionel Messi Lover}} on userpage of Diamond Leveler and all other accounts. This is all within the rules and what you are required to do. I also see that you created a userpage for Abhisruti qho has been inactive for more than a year. Is that also your account? If yes, then please declare that too and all others that you have. Because if there is another report filed on you and a checkuser checks it with his tools its gonna unearth some possible sleepers too which will land you in problem. ShaanSengupta^Talk 12:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned User: Diamond Leveler in my user page, User:Settings gujrti is commons account so no need to mention it as it has zero edit. User: Abhisruti is not my account, it's my friend's account and since last year she in far away town, So as not used by me since a year, I can't say it my account, so I decide to leave the account as it as it's. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lionel Messi Lover your userpage is deleted. Did you request for it? Or the admin did it because of some violation? ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know, I have to ask the admin about it. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 05:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Messi Lover I see u have made your userpage once again. As per the conclusion at the sock investigation, I would advise you to add {{User alternative account name|Diamond Leveler}} on your userpage which will appear as —

This user has an alternative account named Diamond Leveler.

It will let other users know that you have (for now) a legit sock account. ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^Done√ Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 01:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lionel Messi Lover, I remember we agreed on not using Indo - Islamic architecture in Indian ancestry template of Template:User Indian at your own talk page here. You yourself added Patwon ki Haveli then Hawa Mahal which I never objected. Then what made you decide to unilaterally change it and readd Taj Mahal. I would repeat myself. Taj Mahal is Indo-Islamic architecture and not Indian Ancestry. If you want it on your userpage, please make Template:Indo-Islamic or anything like that. Taj Mahal can't be accepted as Indian ancestry. ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taj Mahal can be accepted as Indian Ancestry as it is a great symbol of Indian Medival Era architecture. Isreali PM Netanyahu, Canadian PM Justin Trudeau, even former US president Donald Trump visited specifically Taj Mahal, so this is a global Symbol of India internationally and every Indian should be proud of it and it is now owned by our government, regardless who made it. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 02:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Messi Lover First of all you should not have reverted the status quo. Just because someone visited doesn't mean it can be accepted as Indian ancestry. Yes it is in India, it is owned by Indian government. But these are totally different from Indian ancestry. Indo-Islamic is not Indian ancestry. Indian architecture is Indian ancestry. I am removing it untill this is resolved. You only added Hawa Mahal. Do we need to discuss this after every few months? We need to add something that is traditional Indian architecture with no foreign influence. Mughal architecture is influenced by Arab architecture. ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing foreign influence, Taj Mahal is considered the finest example of Mughal architecture, a style that combines elements from Persian, Indian, and Islamic architectural styles cite: https://www.tajmahal.gov.in/overview.aspx which means it's an amulgum of Indo-Persian architecture, and as The peoples of India and Iran, two ancient neighbouring civilisations, have enjoyed close historical links through the ages, had a common homeland and share a common linguistic and racial past. cite:https://www.indianembassytehran.gov.in/eoithr_pages/MTc,

which means Indo-Persian architecture is not foreign and as they had a common homeland in the past. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Messi Lover That's my point. Mughal architecture is a combination of Indian, Persian, Turkish and others. This is said in your given source only. Having links doesn't mean it is same. Your source itself says that Taj is different from pre-Islamic architecture that was there in India. It combines other architecture in its completion. Which means it is not solely purely Indian in nature. Hence can't be termed as Indian Ancestry. ShaanSengupta^Talk 11:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh genocide. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nomian (talk) 04:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I may have misunderstood the targets of genocide but killing of 1,111 intellectuals in Dacca University a case of Anti-intellectualism, and why was that removed?, They were one of the targets of the genocide, So I am adding it back.

Thank you! Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have to verify your claim by citing a reliable source or it will be considered an original research and will be removed. This time you have cited another Wikipedia article which is not a reliable source, neither it verifies your claim. Nomian (talk) 05:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have accepted that you have a misunderstanding about the topic, it is better to first discuss your proposed edit on the talk page and reach a consensus before adding them to the article. There were many killings but all of them do not fall under the definition of genocide which has a very specific meaning in International Law. The source you added is a news article which is not reliable enough to cite in an article about a historical topic. We mostly rely on academic sources in these cases. Before you dig into cherry-picking another source, I would suggest you again to first discuss your edits on the talk page since all your edits so far have been quite problematic and have disrupted the article. Nomian (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh genocide, you may be blocked from editing. Nomian (talk) 08:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nomian (talk) 05:40, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Regarding numerous edits on Andrew Tate page: [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23]

Please familarise yourself with WP:LEAD as well as MOS:FIRST as previously referenced in history edit comments, and avoid linking to WP:DISAMB pages when adding wikilinks. If there is more up to date information about Tate's boxing career, please add it to the correction section, so the lead can then be updated. Please refrain from adding information to the lead section prior to adding it to the body, and avoid WP:UNDUE content in the lead section as well as the first sentence. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 03:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone (including you or me) could post on Wikipedia:Closure requests right now to request that the RfC be closed. There is no fixed conclusion date for an RfC, but RfCs are typically left open for between 7 and 30 days. In this case, because we both think there is active harm in propagating this misinformation, it might be wise to ask sooner.

Is there any reason that you enclosed your question in quotes? Malerisch (talk) 12:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You! Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you kindly post on Wikipedia:Closure requests right now to request that the RfC be closed? Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added a request, but I can't guarantee that someone will close it immediately. Some closure requests have been left unresolved there for a week or more. Malerisch (talk) 13:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your help! Your edits are appreciated. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Someone who's wrong on the internet. I noticed that you recently removed content from Islam in Assam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you miss understood my edit. I move the human right issues (Discrimination of Bengali Muslims) in the last part of the page like Islam in the Netherlands. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 01:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shruti Haasan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to inform you that one of your recent contributions to the Godhra train tragedy does not appear to be beneficial and has been reversed. Sheikbaba36524 (talk) 03:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57 Can we use Infobox legislative election instead of Infobox election লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're admin. So, no body can betray you লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@লাল সেলাম কমরেড: My status as an admin is not relevant here, but I started a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics#Endless edit warring on general election infoboxes if you would like to give your view there. Cheers, Number 57 17:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LJP Ram Vilas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jharkhand Mukti Morcha Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits on the hindutva section- what you added has no relation to hindutva. Please add the section in his general election campaigns (after 2014 and 2019; no one has added 2024 yet). And then add that there. Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a relations between Hindutva and anti-muslim hate.^[1][2] Hindutva pop artists defend their music as neither xenophobic nor Islamophobic, arguing it promotes truth. Popular Hindutva pop artists like Laxmi Dubey and Prem Krishnavanshi mainstream the xenophobic values of the genre.^[3][2] So, my edits are correct with reliable source as per WP: Reliable. If you have any problem with my edits , discuss it in Talk:Narendra Modi.

Thank You!

Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]