User talk:Cessna38671

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Southaven High School was changed by Free321123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976141 on 2012-09-14T15:23:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Southaven High School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Legoktm (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Memphis Zoo, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Southaven High School. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rivertorch (talk) 17:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Ben Ben (talk) 16:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit-warring, disruptive editing, and vandalism, as you did at Southaven High School. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed a report at WP:EWN regarding your edit warring. Rivertorch (talk) 06:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Southaven High School. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 13:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for exactly this kind of disruptive edit warring behaviour before; you've continued that only four days after your block has expired without any signs of change. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 13:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Southaven High School. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ben Ben (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I am filing a report regarding your edit warring. You just came off your second block and are now repeating the exact same behavior. This is really sad because it's clear you have the ability to make constructive edits. If you were willing to communicate with your fellow editors and follow policy, you could be a real asset to Wikipedia. Rivertorch (talk) 05:35, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Southaven High School. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 10:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cessna, if you want to stop getting blocked, stop edit warring and start discussing. Continuing behaviour that got you blocked before will get you blocked again, for longer. If you wish to edit Wikipedia, read WP:EW and WP:BRD: it is not acceptable to edit an article back and forth; instead, you should try and discuss the issue on the talk page of the article. If you can't do that, you'll keep finding yourself blocked, for increasing lengths of time. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 10:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]