User talk:Bongout

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

You added the references tag to this article. I added a reference and removed the tag. You added the tag again. What's insufficient about my reference? It is from a scholarly, peer reviewed paper documenting this movement-in-the-making. I'm not sure I understand your objection.

Uh huh. And the added reference supports the existence of this neologism HOW, exactly? (This is, of course exactly the comment I left on my edit summary when I restored the tag.) --Calton | Talk 06:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you're being so antagonistic, but it's interfering with my ability to work with you. First, you started with the sarcasm, and now, instead of replying with something adding to your edit summary, you assumed I didn't read it and didn't address my question: why isn't the reference provided enough? It is a substantative paper describing a new social movement. It's not merely a neologism as you put it. Bongout 06:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you're being so antagonistic. I don't like it when someone dodges simple questions, I don't like it when someone displays obvious disingenuousness, I don't like it when someone claims to have done something they obviously haven't, and I don't like it when someone insults my intelligence. Other than that, not a thing about your response bothers me.

Third time -- and read carefully this time -- the added reference supports the existence of this neologism, the title of this article, the word you are using, HOW, exactly? You get one more shot, or it's straight off to AFD and you get to talk about it with a bunch more people. --Calton | Talk 07:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must first warn you that you're coming dangerously close to violating the Three Revert Rule, an official policy of Wikipedia. If you do that, you may be banned and you will be temporarily blocked from editing any pages on Wikipedia.

Now, I've already explained (in here and in other forums) how the paper I included as a reference includes information about this movement. However, I will repeat it for you since you seem not to have been following this discussion very closely. In the paper cited, the researcher, Prof. Hsiung, includes data she gathered as well as a sociological analysis of both that data and data already included in the Literature to document this movement in a scholarly fashion. Again, I'm not sure why such a source would be unsatisfactory. Bongout 08:02, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the main problem that people are having with your reference is that they are not finding any evidence that the paper, the journal or the author even exist. If you could provide a link which would conclusively demonstrate that they do, this would help immensely. Please bear in mind that since you were the one who added this information, you have some responsibility to prove that it is not simply nonsense made up on the spot. This is not something aimed specially at you, this is standard policy. Try reading this, this and this. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 15:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in my essay on the subject. *Dan T.* (talk) 04:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy ^talk 18:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was an independent convenience store in Barrie, Ontario. I found that it's available at another independent store just across the street from me as well. So someone's definitely working on distributing it. Lexicon (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on How important is a good night's sleep, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 12:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on How important is a good night's sleep requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin 12:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 12:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]