User talk:Bob not snob

Hello, Bob not snob, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Hi Bob not snob! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent articles, including Jan Otrębski, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Piotrus, I followed your advice and nominated it at T:TDYK.--Bob not snob (talk) 06:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I could review it myself but I think it will be more interesting to see what another reviewer things about it. A review may take anything from few hours to few weeks; if there are any issues you will get a message here, otherwise it will be featured on the from page (and again you'll get a notification here). Happy editing! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Jan Otrębski at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Murder in Texas. Because you participated in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jan Otrębski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jan Otrębski, who knew nothing of the Lithuanian language until his adulthood, is honored in Lithuania for his studies of the language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jan Otrębski. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jan Otrębski), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your articles would be welcome here! Keep up the good work!† Encyclopædius 11:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will take a look.--Bob not snob (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bob not snob! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! GizzyCatBella🍁 09:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Unfortunately, I do not know Polish, and I am not sufficiently familiar with Polish sources and politics to respond to your comment. Thanks, My very best wishes (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should take care then, the source you restored is extremist.--Bob not snob (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TonyBallioni (talk) 06:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, but technically the above notice didn’t alert you as it was the old one. Like it says. Not an implication of wrongdoing, just given out because you’re active in the area. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TonyBallioni, why are all these similarly worded alerts needed? I have been editing Polish topics since registering. Is this about Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#The Volunteer (book) and Witold Pilecki? Pilecki is our 1940 version of Davy Crockett, very brave but also many myths. One of the editors on that page is very aggressive about including the myths, to the point that it sucks out the fun of editing. What should I do differently, if at all?--Bob not snob (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AC/DS is a special set of rules for areas of high conflict. They require that people be aware of them using a formal template for them to apply. The one given above was the wrong one, so I updated it to be the correct one. And yeah, I’d noticed the conflict surrounding that topic so just wanted to make sure you were “aware” in the formal sense. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Bob not snob. It looks like you reverted[1] that aggressive editor 12 minutes after registering your account back in November of last year[2]. You were also well aware of WP:APLRS when you were reverting them several times after, including in February [3],[4]. You were surprised but well aware of ARBCOM sanctions [5] when you filed case against one of the administrators. Still, you are asking User:TonyBallioni why these alerts are needed? - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I got involved with this discussion and edited to apply the APLRS policy that the noticeboard consensus told that applied. Bob not snob (talk) 19:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your response is not about what I asked. - GizzyCatBella🍁 19:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bob,

Consider adding a {{reftalk}} template at the end of every talk page section that contains <ref> tags.[6] If one isn't present then the sources from across the page will "clump up" at the bottom, which is both unsightly and cumbersome to navigate (cf. this with this).

Cheers. François Robere (talk) 15:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I shall try to use this.--Bob not snob (talk) 11:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - since you were involved in the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#The_Volunteer_(book), I am letting you know that I have requested clarification from the Arbitration Committee about how we should interpret the wording of the remedy at WP:APLRS. If you wish to comment on the request, it is at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_Antisemitism_in_Poland#Article_sourcing_expectations. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 15:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification.--Bob not snob (talk) 07:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed part of your statement on the open clarification request for Antisemitism in Poland, as I and an arbitrator deemed it needed removal. As this is a clerk action, you should not reinstate the removed statement. Please ensure that when you make your statement you do not make bad faith assumptions or personal attacks on other users. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

---

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.