User talk:BATTLEBOTS BOI

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caldera (3LB Combat Robot) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BATTLEBOTS BOI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mamaroneck (village), New York instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rye Neck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bite Force (Battlebot) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

missing information to summarize or explain what the article is about, and creator of this page triggered edit filter after creating this short article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mamaroneck (village), New York, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Shore Acres, Mamaroneck. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am unsure how to save it as a draft, so it helped. Thanks! BATTLEBOTS BOI (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to either demonstrate WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shore Acres, Mamaroneck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shore Acres, Mamaroneck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to BattleBots Reboot Competitors. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the exceptions where other sources are also open to change, so they wouldn't be reliable. The Battlebots website is not biased towards any robot(s), and I simply used the bots shown on the pages in the references. BATTLEBOTS BOI (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving that into mainspace. There's nothing about it that makes it ready for main space. There are NO sources at all, and sourcing it to some company page doesn't make it notable by our standards. Pinging User:Significa liberdade, FYI. Drmies (talk) 00:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Battlebots website is a primary source, so what is wrong with it? BATTLEBOTS BOI (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be considered worthy of having a Wikipedia page, an article needs to have sources that are independent. If independent sources do not exist, the subject is not considered worthy of having a Wikipedia page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll just move it to the page for BattleBots as a whole, or move each section to their respective season if that's a better idea. BATTLEBOTS BOI (talk) 00:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it properly sourced? I think you may be overplaying the notability of that kind of information, which strikes me as Wikia material. Drmies (talk) 00:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It helps to have more info, doesn't it? BATTLEBOTS BOI (talk) 12:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, apparently the list page isn't necessary because the pages for each season has a list LOL. BATTLEBOTS BOI (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]