User talk:ArmenianJoe

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia fellow Armenian! You should consider joining WikiProject Armenia, which is like a central for Armenian-related edits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Armenia If you have any other questions, feel free to leave them on my discussion page. Have fun! -- Davo88 03:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page is not Turkish propaganda. It is denial of the Armenian genocide. OttomanReference 04:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the talk page, you can see that this article is approved by the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Armenia, it is not a Pork and covers the deniers view. It is part of that representing fairly and without bias all significant views that have been published by a reliable source. I hope you show some respect, as a child of ALL repressed people. Thanks.OttomanReference 05:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The text is referenced; You are wrong.--OttomanReference 05:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are true yourself, why don't you delete all the text? because the version you are using have the basic ideas. Thanks. OttomanReference 05:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reversions[1] made on January 7 2007 to Denial of the Armenian Genocide

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 10:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My name is zerolex, plz u understand spanish, mi inglish is bad, i need a traduction of armenian to spanish, i wikipedia i spanish --Zerolex 11:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to Iranian Azerbaijan's talk page and explain your reverts and edits. All of this is pointless if there is no discussion. Thanks. The Behnam 06:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your cooperation. In the future, do not remove sourced information. Thanks you. The Behnam 07:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As warned, further reverting at Azerbaijan (Iran) will be met with blocks. Furthermore, you've been edit warring at Koryun as well. Please use your period off to read WP:DR and take it to heart. Dmcdevit·t 07:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I hadn't seen your warning and many other users like AdilBagayov and Grandmaster had reverted too. I accept that I was edit warring at Koryun, but I reverted my last revert and stopped. And the reason I started edit-waring there, is because I was being stalked by User:The Behnam who had never edited that page or shown any intrest in the topic, and I got extremely frustrated, annoyed, and creeped out by him follwing me. Again, I was truly unaware of your warning.

You should read talk page discussion before reverting an article. Furthermore, reverting another user's cmments on his own talk page is very inappropriate: [2] [3]. Finally, it looks much more likely to me that you were stalking The Behnam, especially with reverts like this at a completely unrelated article. Did you honestly need to revert his edit of the images at cuteness without first attempting discussion. That is completely the wrong attitute to have at a collaborative encyclopedia. Dmcdevit·t 07:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please look again, he was stalking me first. I first encountered him on Iranian Azerbaijan, then he came on a completely unrelated article Koryun just to revert my edit. He originally removed my warning from his talk page calling it "silly accusation", which is why I reverted him and kept reverting him, I didn't realize I was removing his comment because his first revert was removing my warning. I thought he was just removing my waring again and again. Please take a closer look at User:The Behnam's behavior, he's uncivil, stalks users and edit-wars to the 3RR limit on a wide range of articles.

"He was stalking me first" is quite possibly the least satisfying response you culd have given. Simply put, and by your own admission: stalking is bad, he stalked you, you stalked him; therefore, I blocked both of you. QED. Now don't stalk anyone again, or you'll be blocked again. You must give reasons for your content reverts. That isn't optional; this is an encyclopedia. Dmcdevit·t 08:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I accept that, but please remind Behnam not to stalk editors as well, he's done that a lot. BTW, I just realized I had made a mistake on User:The Behnam's talk page, I assumed by "re silly accusations" he was simply removing my warning, I thought by re he meant remove, which is why I reverted him. That was may misunderstanding, and yes I did later try to retaliate his stalking of my edits by stalking him in the same manner. But he started stalking me, and I felt very angry and annoyed by that. If you look again, you see clearly that right after I made an edit on Iranian Azerbaijan, he started stalking me on another unrelated article which he had never edited or shown interest in, Koryun.

Please assume good faith and be civil when dealing with fellow contributors. Failure to do this may result in baeing blocked. Khoikhoi 19:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance. Khoikhoi 04:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Talk:History_of_the_name_Azerbaijan#toning_down_paragraph_about_Rasulzade? I will leave your revert in place provided you discuss this shortly on the articles talk page. John Vandenberg 08:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 48 hours due to continued edit-warring. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of you edits since returning have been reverts. In particular, you immediately resumed edit warring at Denial of the Armenian Genocide, for which you had been blocked in the first place. When your block expires, you must undertake WP:DR in the future rather than mechanical and undiscussed repeated reverts. Dmcdevit·t 00:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to indefinite for abusive sockpuppetry. Dmcdevit·t 05:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]