User talk:Appleattic

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Darius 1961.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Adam Darius 1961.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:In Cuba 1984.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thank you for uploading File:Adam Darius & Kazimir Kolesnik Resurrection.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Hekerui (talk) 01:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, File:Adam Darius 1961.jpg, File:In the bathtub.jpg, and File:In Cuba 1984.jpg are nominated for deletion for missing evidence of permission. Regards Hekerui (talk) 16:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Appleattic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Riad Ismat - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adam Darius: international theatrical performances has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Adam Darius, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That link makes no mention of tours to Afghanistan, Taiwan, Indonesia, Swaziland, nor does it use the term "expressive mime". The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC) - The link reference refers to Australia in particular; it also mentions New Guinea. I am working on adding more references.[reply]

You continue to add unsourced claims. Please be sure to read WP:BLP. You have been warned about this many times. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I am trying to add source refs that relate to published newspaper articles or the websites of venues where Mr Darius has performed. Some of your requests for refs and citations seem a little excessive - i.e. a citation for date and place of birth? - A I supposed to give a link to his birth certificate? It seems that most Wikipedia biographies do not go to such extremes (I am using Placido Domingo as a guide - this seems like a well constructed wiki article; it has 46 references, however there are considerable portions of text therein which do not have a source reference to support each sentence. Mr Darius' original career archives are stored at the Royal Academy of Dance in London and at the Dansmuseet in Stockholm. Ultimately, all claims can be verified by reference to the materials on display at these museums.

Actually, a birth certificate is not considered a valid reference because it's a primary source. Newspaper articles, magazine stories, etc. would work. And yes, any claims on a WP:BLP article must have references. We can't use references to a museum archives unless they are avaliable for view. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 18:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you repeat this question when I had already answered it? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation.. See also WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the link, that is an interesting article. I will try to incorporate all of your suggestions. Appleattic (talk) 20:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Appleattic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 8#File:Bathtub (leg style).jpg. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]