User talk:Aoba47/Archive 2

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Aoba47. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Shine (Gwen Stefani song) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@Baffle gab1978: Thank you! Let me know if you have any questions about the article that need to be clarified. Aoba47 (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Aoba47, the article was straightforward to copyedit, though feel free to correct anything I may have misinterpreted, or other silly errors on my part. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! You helped to improve it a lot. Aoba47 (talk) 03:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry to see you leave the GA Cup! You did a lot of good work in round one. :) Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 02:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

@Johanna: Thank you! That is very sweet. I enjoying being able to participate in the GA cup, but unfortunately school and work got really intense. I am glad that I got a chance to work with you as you have done a lot of great work on here and I am just glad that I am not completing messing everything up on here lol. Hope you are having a great weekend. :-) Aoba47 (talk) 03:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the No Time for It page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article No Time for It has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest that you archive the rest of the URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop “dead links” over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click save. This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl= http etc|archivedate=25 April 2016}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Thank you! The article looks and flows a lot better now. I have been having some trouble with https://archive.org/web/, but I will try it again in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For expanding Shine (Gwen Stefani song) during the FA review process! Keep up the great work! Carbrera (talk) 00:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:NoTimeforItAcousticVersion.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:BizounceOliviaAudioSample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:TemptTeaseTouchPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 05:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! Thursday saw the end of Round 2. Sainsf once again took out Round 2 with an amazing score of 996 (a higher score then he received in Round 1!). In second place, MPJ-DK earned an astounding 541 points, and in third place, Carbrera received 419 points. In Round 2, 142 reviews were completed! At the beginning of April, there were 486 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 1, there were 384. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [1]; at the end of Round 2, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months.[2] It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 3 so we can keep lowering the backlog as much as possible. To qualify for the third round, contestants had to earn the two highest scores in each of the four pools in Round 2; plus, one wildcard. We had an unusual occurrence happen in Round 2: because only one contestant submitted reviews in one pool, we selected the contestant with the next highest score to move forward to Round 3. (There will be a rule change for future competitions in case something like this happens again.) For Round 3, users were placed in 3 random pools of 3. To qualify for the Final of the 3rd Annual GA Cup, the top user in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 4th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 3 will start on May 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on May 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here. Good luck and have fun! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:NatalieColeDayDreamingMusicVideo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! It has been brought to our attention that we made a mistake in the last newsletter. In the last newsletter, we said that the "4th place" overall would make the Final along with the top user from each pool. However, the users who will advance will be the top user from each pool along with "4th and 5th place" overall. We apologize for any inconvenience or confusion that we caused. Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out and saving me from more embarrassment - I really need to keep it in mind to do that. It's been too many times. JWNoctis^{talk to me} 02:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

No worries, I make a lot of mistakes on here that were far more embarrassing lol. Thank you for commenting! Aoba47 (talk) 04:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

I noticed that you put up Shine (Gwen Stefani song) for a copy edit request and hope to get it to FA. I did a few quick cleanup steps and a couple of minor copy edits.

While looking through the citations, I see that there are a few date formats that don't match the most commonly used format. That should be cleaned up before the article goes to FAC. Good luck! – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the c/e. Since I am still very new to Wikipedia, I still have to do research on here to find the correct way of citing dates. I will fix it as soon as I can. Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 17:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Aoba47:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Bizounce has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Don't forget to archive your article's URLs when you have time.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I will archive the article's URLs as soon as I have time. Aoba47 (talk) 18:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for the peer review! Moscowamerican (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Just trying to help. Aoba47 (talk) 20:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bizounce you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 03:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article No Time for It you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 03:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DebbiMorganSeer.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@Stefan2: I'll just remove the image from the article. Aoba47 (talk) 14:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Liz Sanbourne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 00:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

The article Bizounce you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bizounce for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

The article Bizounce you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bizounce for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 00:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Whitney Russell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 11:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Sainsf (talk · contribs) 11:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you! That is really kind and amazing for you to do. I am just trying to do my best on here and I have definitely made plenty of mistakes, but I greatly appreciate your message. I look forward to working with you in the future. Hope you have a great day! Aoba47 (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

The article No Time for It you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:No Time for It for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Russell family (Passions) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

The article No Time for It you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:No Time for It for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 23:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! Tuesday saw the end of Round 3. Sainsf, for the third time, won with a sizable 487 points and a shocking 29 articles reviewed. In second, MPJ-DK had 168 points and 7 reviewed articles. In second place, MPJ-DK earned 168 points with just 7 articles, and in third place, Carbrera received 137 points with just 9 articles. Our two wildcard slots went to J Milburn with 122 points and Sturmvogel 66 with 101 points. In Round 3, 65 reviews were completed! At the beginning of the GA Cup, there were 595 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 3, there were 394. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of the GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [3]; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months [4]—nothing before 2016. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Finals for the GA Cup so that are successes continue. To qualify for the Finals, contestants had to earn the highest scores in each of the three pools in Round 3; plus, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users in all of the pools. For the Finals, users were placed in one pool of the remaining five users. To win the GA Cup, you must have the most points. The Finals started on June 1 at 0:00:01 UTC' and end on June 30 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about the Finals and the pools can be found here. A clarification: in order for the points to count, you must mark your reviews as completed; it's not up to the judges to ensure that all reviews are completed by the end of a round. We wish all the contestants the best of luck! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Could you do me a huge favor? The mentioned songs have been listed for deletion here, despite them having independent sources written about them. I know you reviewed two out of the three of them, so your input may be helpful. Thank you very much. Carbrera (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

• @Carbrera: Will do; thank you for bringing this to my attention. Aoba47 (talk) 20:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Liz Sanbourne you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Liz Sanbourne for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Liz Sanbourne you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Liz Sanbourne for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olivia (Olivia album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Whitney Russell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Whitney Russell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Aoba47:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Shine (Gwen Stefani song) has been completed. I must say that I too was having trouble understanding "the prose is not of FA standard" comment. I hope my minor fixes help.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help! You are always a really great editor and your fixes definitely help. Aoba47 (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I've had a look after your updates and made very few changes. I clarified a point: "She later praised the lyrics after watching the film with her children and seeing the complete animation for the Paddington Bear character." I don't have access to the DVD interview so I wanted to make sure that she was referring to the character's animation and not the film itself. If it was in fact the complete film, you'll have to fix this in the lead and in the Composition section. Regards. Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you; she is referring to the character so the clarification was needed. Aoba47 (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Aoba47:

I just wanted to let you know that I have finished the copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Vincent Clarkson. Since it is discussing a television show character I made a number of changes to the verb tenses so that the show is described in the present tense. I hope I caught them all.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you for copyediting for the article. I always forget about tense when writing so I will keep that in mind for that future. Aoba47 (talk) 21:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Olivia (Olivia album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Olivia (Olivia album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 17:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Olivia (Olivia album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Olivia (Olivia album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 00:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Bizounce at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Random86 (talk) 01:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Russell family (Passions) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Russell family (Passions) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Russell family (Passions) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Russell family (Passions) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vincent Clarkson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chad Harris-Crane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 13:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Vincent Clarkson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vincent Clarkson for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 13:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Aoba47:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Kyra (Charmed) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Vincent Clarkson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vincent Clarkson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Chad Harris-Crane you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chad Harris-Crane for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Chad Harris-Crane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chad Harris-Crane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kyra (Charmed) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 02:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Billie Jenkins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christy Jenkins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Kyra (Charmed) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kyra (Charmed) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Billie Jenkins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Billie Jenkins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Christy Jenkins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Christy Jenkins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Christy Jenkins at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:BillieChristy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey, sorry to see that you have decided to prematurely end your peer review and are considering to retire. I know it is a bummer going through FAC and having an article you work hard on to be archived rather than promoted, but for some encouraging words your article does have potential even though the size of it was questioned; I had a small(er) article that pass and even users brought the size question up. So don't give up! But if you're feeling too down then take a wiki break and return to editing and improving Wikipedia once you cleared your head. Good luck in the future and hope to see you around editing. Best – jona ✉ 14:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

• @AJona1992: Thank you for your kind words! My decision to end the peer review and consider retirement from here actually did not have anything to do with the FAC process. I appreciate all of the constructive feedback. However, I am too busy with school and work to devote a lot of time to Wikipedia anymore. I have decided to take a wiki break instead. Thank you again for your comments. :-) Aoba47 (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome and hope to see you back soon. Take care – jona ✉ 18:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

• @AJona1992: I ended up just working on a completely different article instead lol. I think for the time I am happy with bringing "Shine" to the level of a GA article. I really wanted to get it to FA since it would be the first unreleased song brought up to that level (at least as far as I know). I may revisit it when I am less stressed about it. Congratulations on Missing My Baby; it makes me want to listen to more Selena lol. Hope all your work on here is going well. Aoba47 (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Like – jona ✉ 01:05, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Aoba47:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Chad Harris-Crane has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!

• Television (project page, talk page)
• Fictional_characters (project page, talk page)
• Film (project page, talk page)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King? you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King? you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King? for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King? you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King? for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 06:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
12,513		Grey's Anatomy (talk)						Add sources
99		Television Hall of Fame (talk)						Add sources
72		Gwen Hotchkiss (talk)						Add sources
7,433		Aaliyah (talk)						Add sources
22		Ivy Winthrop (talk)						Add sources
25		The Hollow (Charmed) (talk)						Add sources
1,594		Soap opera (talk)						Cleanup
1,546		Amelia Shepherd (talk)						Cleanup
751		Richard Webber (talk)						Cleanup
21		Grace Bennett (talk)						Expand
117		Forever Charmed (talk)						Expand
39		Charmed Again (talk)						Expand
615		Passions (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
34		Gideon (Charmed) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
25		Paloma Lopez-Fitzgerald (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
17		Rex Buckland (talk)						Merge
31		Hannah Webster (talk)						Merge
2,174		AOL (talk)						Merge
99		Seattle Grace: Message of Hope (talk)						Wikify
2,885		Mark Sloan (Grey's Anatomy) (talk)						Wikify
294		American Idol (season 10) (talk)						Wikify
2		Atlantic Council of Serbia (talk)						Orphan
24		Anuppan (talk)						Orphan
2		Actinotachina angusta (talk)						Orphan
39		Chrystee Pharris (talk)						Stub
114		Fast & Furious (soundtrack) (talk)						Stub
8		Sex 'n' Money (talk)						Stub
8		Cathy Jenéen Doe (talk)						Stub
10		Katherine Crane (talk)						Stub
14		Sondra Huxtable (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Aoba47. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Billie Jenkins at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC))

@Baffle gab1978: Thank you! Let me know if there is anything that I need to do. Aoba47 (talk) 00:12, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Billie Jenkins at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your continuous work to improve TV industry related articles. Here's one for the flawless and expeditious work on Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?. Good job. :) NumerounovedantTalk 20:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

• @Numerounovedant: Thank you for your support! I am planning on c/e and preparing that article for FAC sometime in the future because I think that episode and the show deserves more attention. You do a lot of excellent work on here so it means a lot to hear this from you. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you anytime :-) Aoba47 (talk) 21:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

I sure will when I have something that may interest you. Till then good luck with this and ping me if you need any help. NumerounovedantTalk 07:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Christy Jenkins has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 16:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:LizSeduces.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Final/Wrap-Up Hello to our truly awesome GA Cup competitors! Thursday, June 30 saw the end of the 2016 GA Cup. It was a huge success. In the final, our five competitors reviewed an astonishing 207 articles, the most in any GA Cup final thus far. We continue to reach our goals and make a substantial impact in how quickly articles are reviewed for GA status. On March 1, the start of this competition, the article longest in the queue had languished there since June 26, 2015 [5]; in the July 1, 2016 list, the average wait length is just four months [6]. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for their enthusiasm, and for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success. Remember that most articles can't even be considered for FA status unless it's been passed to GA first, so our efforts have created hundreds of potentials FAs. That is, as they say, a big deal. The final this time represented a real horse race between our 1st and 2nd place winners. First-time competitor (who had won all previous rounds) Sainsf earned an impressive 1456 points with 91 articles reviewed during the final. Close behind, in second place was Carbrera, also a first-time competitor, reviewed the most articles (94). Their enthusiasm was a treat to witness. Congrats to you both! The competition went relatively smoothly, with very little drama this time. We had to clarify one rule: in order for the points to count, you must mark your reviews as completed; it's not up to the judges to ensure that all reviews are completed by the end of a round. We were strict about adhering to this clarification, especially at the end of the final. We intend on stressing it in the stated rules for our next competition, which will be announced soon, so watch out for it. We also intend on applying for a grant through Wikimedia to include gift certificates for our winners, to further incentivize the GA Cup. MrWooHoo should receive special recognition for acting as our main judge, and for stepping in for the rest of the judges when real-life busyness took over. He reviewed the majority of the submissions during our final round. Thanks for your hard work, and for the hard work of all our judges. We look forward to the next competition. Again, thanks to all our competitors, and congrats to our winners. Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Billie Jenkins at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:06, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:SimoneRussellRaeThomas.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:NatalieColeSingingInDresses.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Billie Jenkins at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey Aoba, hope you doing good. If you find some spare time you would you mind taking up the review for Mélanie Laurent, if the article interests you. NumerounovedantTalk 15:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

• @Numerounovedant: Thank you for your comment and I hope everything is going well for you as well. Unfortunately, I will be too busy with school and work to do an adequate job on the GA review for your article. Besides, my primary area of focus on here is television and fictional characters (and occasionally music), and articles on living people are a little out of my comfort zone so I do not want to do anything incorrectly. One thing I did notice when looking over the article was that you should attribute and source the quote in the "Early life" section. Otherwise, it is a very interesting read (I never heard of this woman before so it was cool to learn more about someone else). One of these days, I'll have to learn about the style and approach for articles on living people on here. Aoba47 (talk) 06:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

No problem, however, I strongly recommend you watch Inglorious Bastards (if you haven't), as Laurent plays a French cinema owner who plans to assassinate Adolf Hilter. It also has a strong ensemble with Brad Pitt, Christopher Waltz and Diane Kruger involved in another (more dynamic and action filled) way of carrying their assassination plans. I am sure you'll love the film and Laurent's performance of course. XD NumerounovedantTalk 13:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the recommendation! I keep meaning to watch that movie (It looks awesome and I am probably one of the last people to have not seen it yet lol). Good luck with the article! Aoba47 (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Aoba47. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King? at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Miniapolis 17:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you! You have improved the article a great deal, and I appreciate it a lot. Aoba47 (talk) 17:42, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Glad to help. Good luck and all the best, Miniapolis 23:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:LoveIncLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love, Inc. (TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

At the WPTV/Assessment page, you stated: "This is my first time working on an article about a television series so I am still in the process of learning it." If you ever have a question or need help, feel free to ask at WPTV's talkpage or ask anyone (including me) directly. Thanks. — Wyliepedia 00:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@CAWylie: Thank you very much for your encouragement! If I ever encounter any problems or need any guidance, I will definitely reach out to the WikiProject directly. I am very grateful to have access to the project, and to have received such warm support and constructive criticism since I first joined Wikipedia. Aoba47 (talk) 00:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:No More Blue Chirstmas.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

The article Love, Inc. (TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Love, Inc. (TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 13:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

You might want to invite reviewers for your nomination, try helping in other FAC's or maybe other reviews so you can approach editors for help with your own. I'll put up my comments shortly. Good Luck. (Stay away from Wikipedia:Canvassing) NumerounovedantTalk 15:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

@Numerounovedant: Thank you for your advice! I was hesitant about asking other users for comments as I did not want to accidentally violate Wikipedia:Canvassing. Aoba47 (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

It isn't canvassing untill you leave a neutral message for help. :) NumerounovedantTalk 18:01, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. I was always a little uncertain about the rules when it came to that. Aoba47 (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 01:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Love, Inc. (TV series) has been completed.

A suggestion - the Critical Response has far more negative reviews than are warranted. Three or four of the harshest reviews is likely enough. At present it looks as if you've included every on-line mention you could find.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

• @Twofingered Typist: Thank you for your comments; I will alter the "Reception" section according to your comments. The series primarily received negative reviews, but I will take out some of them. Aoba47 (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

• @Twofingered Typist: I have made some adjustments to the "Reception" section, and combined two of the paragraphs. I have eliminated the source where I only cited a few words from the main article. Please let me know if the changes are good enough, or if you think more needs to cut to improve the article. I would really like to put this up for FAC sometime in the future so I greatly appreciate your feedback. Aoba47 (talk) 16:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

@Aoba47: These changes are a great improvement. Now there's a balance between positive and negative - and the negatives are from solid publications. Regards Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you again! I greatly appreciate your feedback. I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day. Aoba47 (talk) 18:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)