User talk:Antiscene

That ain't my review. And on what basis is it not professional? Spidercomrade (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff" - Is it written by a professional music journalist? Yes. Does the publication have a paid editorial and writing staff? Yes. Is it valid, then? Yes. And please refrain from personal attacks on me. Spidercomrade (talk) 00:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just proved to you that I'm not wrong, so I don't need to understand anything of the sort. What part of "www.apolloscred.com" isn't a website? Spidercomrade (talk) 05:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, let me get this straight... you're busy deleting the (professional) review I added to an article, and meanwhile you're adding your own user review to a different album's article? This smacks of hypocrisy. Spidercomrade (talk) 16:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I appreciate the compliment, but I really didn't write that review. Good luck with yours. Spidercomrade (talk) 16:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're looking for a site such as this: Digg. Wikipedia is not the place for advertising. Sputnikmusic and Tumbler should definitely not be added and we have a staff review from AbsolutePunk, so that is out of the question. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 05:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]