User talk:AnkkAnkur

Hello, AnkkAnkur!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock-puppetry. Unless you have prior experience editing Wikipedia and are familiar with the notability guidelines, please stop voting in XfD discussions. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to KJ Dhaliwal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have disclosed your paid contributions in your userpage, please also disclose your previous accounts. It is evident by now that you are familiar with moving pages, BLP policies and structuring an article. Please stop from further editing until you disclose your previous account. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you moved the article to draft, its written there you can move the page back, also COI there was written to disclose how to, I did the same, I failed during moving page Mistakenly moved the page to talk page, then fixed it. I’ve had no other account before. But I edited from IP today. Just not to confuse. AnkkAnkur (talk) 12:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How did you start voting in AfDs if you haven't had any other account before? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on KJ Dhaliwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 06:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KJ Dhaliwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KJ Dhaliwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article was already reviewed, you marked it reviewed again, also you nominated for deletion I’ll explain why this article is notable and definitely deserves the place on Wikipedia. Gathering policies I’ll soon explain maybe in few hours. AnkkAnkur (talk) 12:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take your time as the AFD only gets relisted or closed after seven days. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Mumbaiker per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mumbaiker. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]