User talk:Andreas.sta

Hello! Andreas.sta, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andreas.sta,

• I have removed the Underwater diving navbox you added to the NACD article because it does not include organisations. However this has shown up the need for an appropriate navbox for diver associations, clubs etc, and possibly other aspects of organised diving. If you are interested in discussing possibilities please reply either here, on my user page or on the portal talk page for Portal:Underwater diving.
• There is a Wikiproject for scuba and other diving you might be interested in joining, at WP:SCUBA.
• Another point, could you add more in-line references for the training details you added to the NACD and SDI articles. One per subsection would be about minimum for this application. It is not that I question the information, just that as time goes by other edits will be made and the origins get lost. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 09:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Peter,

• Thanks for letting me know about the edits. The Diver training navbox looks very similar to the Diver organizations navbox, however I will be happy to assist with any new project.
• Will be joining the Wikiproject straight after I finish this message and will add the references mentioned as well.

Andreas.sta (talk) 17:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andreas.sta, Nice to see a new user on the scuba project. There is so much to do that you can just browse a bit until you find:

• Something that needs work that you can improve,
• Something missing that you can add.
• If you disagree with something, you can change it as long as you can reliably reference your change. If the original statement is referenced you should either leave it in and add the alternative information from your source or explain why the original statement is wrong or misrepresents its source.

Before making an edit that might be considered controversial, it may help to read the article talk page, other times it doesnt help at all. This is a fairly anarchic environment in some ways, but it has its traditions, and one is that you are judged by the work you do and the way you fit in, not by who you might be in real life. Once you come to terms with some of the restrictions it is quite a pleasant place to work.

Good luck, Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 07:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andreas.sta, I think Decompression (diving) is up to A-class, Please take a look when you have the time and comment on article talk page. Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 06:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Peter (Southwood). I have just finished the review. I can see a lot of work went into the topic! Andreas.sta (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, quite a few hours. Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 16:04, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Greece
	You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Greece. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list.
	I hope you accept! - Constantine ✍

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coast guard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illicit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andreas.sta. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Emergency Response Unit (Cyprus), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emergency Response Unit (Cyprus) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emergency Response Unit (Cyprus) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cyprus Police Emergency Response Unit Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]