User talk:Alpha0987654321

Hi Alpha0987654321! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jab We Met seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edit, Imran Khan was credited first, is there a reason for the cast name switching? DareshMohan (talk) 06:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Hindi films of 2006, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 02:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Filmfare Award for Best Music Director, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amy Farrah Fowler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Girl Talk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding rowspan to 'Awards' tables. Unless used carefully, rowspan use, especially improper use of rowspan, will significantly reduce the "readability" of these tables (as well as making the "code" harder to edit for other editors). So, unless you know what you're doing, adding rowspan to tables is a bad thing to do. As this seems to be the major thrust of your recent editing, I would encourage you to move on to other types of editing. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha0987654321 Please read the above, you have not responded and making same edits. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And still doing this... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas break but back with the rowspan issues, please stop @Alpha0987654321. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just reverted another handful, please stop @Alpha0987654321 Indagate (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha0987654321 This is still getting ignored, please read. 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC) Indagate (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Titanic (1997 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 16:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kriti Sanon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 04:06, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence, you may be blocked from editing. And at other articles. Clearly not interested in editing constructively – one more warning, and you will be looking at a block. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Ravensfire. Your recent edit(s) to the page Love Aaj Kal (2009 film) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stop pushing promotional wording into articles when it clearly doesn't belong. Ravensfire (talk) 04:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly stop readding it. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 17:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plus that edit included a lot of problematic rowspan, see #Rowspan in 'Awards' tables Indagate (talk) 18:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Epicgenius. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from 53W53 and several other articles. Redlinks are useful and can often be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" link (in the tools listed at the left in desktop view) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Epicgenius (talk) 12:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anne Hathaway, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 17:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence. Final warning – you've been warned multiple times not to use rowspan inappropriately at this article and you've ignored it. Next time I will be seeking a block. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add any unknown person name in the notable person list of Indian cities. Kindly, refrain from adding such information. --Sainath468 21:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Amrita Rao, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geniac (talk) 02:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bajirao Mastani. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SKAG123 (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason you're not replying to any of the messages you have received thus far? Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharmila Tagore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konkona Sen Sharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Alpha0987654321. I am @Archer1234. I noticed your recent edit to Siddharth Anand where you restored your previously reverted edit that changed the date format in the section headeings from a non-abbreviated form (XXXX-YYYY) to a two-digit ending year form (XXXX-YY).

The Wikpedia Manual of Style for Dates and Numbers says (emphasis in original):

Although non-abbreviated years are generally preferred, two-digit ending years [...] may be used in any of the following cases: (1) two consecutive years; (2) infoboxes and tables where space is limited (using a single format consistently in any given table column); and (3) in certain topic areas if there is a very good reason, such as matching the established convention of reliable sources.

Use of two-digit ending years in the section headings at Siddharth Anand does not appear to fall within any of these exceptions.

You originally made this change here and were reverted here with the edit summary of MOS:DATERANGE, which is a link to the section of the Manual of Style quoted above. Per WP:BRD, you made a BOLD edit, but then were REVERTed. At that point you should have started a DISCUSSion (ideally at Talk:Siddharth Anand) to discuss and seek consensus for your proposed change. Instead, you restored your edit. This is edit warring.

I am going to restore the section headings with full year date ranges, in line with the guidance from the Manual of Style. If you reinstate the two-digit ending year format absent a discussion and consensus, then I will file a complaint with an appropriate administrator's noticeboard. To reinforce my message here, after I post this message I will post the boilerplate edit-warring warning on your talk page, which has more links to the relevant policies and guidelines for situations like this. I encourage you to read them.  — Archer (t·c) 01:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Siddharth Anand. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  — Archer (t·c) 01:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Varun Dhawan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 180.28.59.165 (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Fabelmans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michelle Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 01:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Almost Famous. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Films, and the people involved with them, don't "earn" Academy Award nominations. DonIago (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the lead edit, that seems better. I did reverse where you changed a direct quote (the names of the actors). Direct quotes shouldn't be changed on Wikipedia, or anywhere for that matter. Maybe keep a lookout for when something is a quote (I've made that mistake at least a few times, not realizing I was editing a quote, then did realize and reverted. Hopefully I haven't made others that I and other editors missed). Randy Kryn (talk) 03:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop removing wikilinks to categories in list of awards articles. Lapadite (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to film categories at Roman Holiday without previous agreement counts as disruption. In addition, your edit summary as "fixed grammar" was dishonest. Plainly you are WP:NOTHERE to help Wikipedia, as most of your past editing history demonstrates. You have already been blocked from editing once and will now be reported to administrators to see if the block can be made longer. Sweetpool50 (talk) 07:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The China Syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. Edits that plainly violate the MOS (e.g. spelling out numbers lower than ten) are not improvements. DonIago (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Valereee (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P-blocking from article space to try to get the attention of this editor, who has never edited a talk or user talk. No objection to anyone else unblocking once this editor has started discussing. Valereee (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alpha0987654321. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]