User talk:Alibaba1235

Hello, Alibaba1235, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Greyjoy ^talk 05:35, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you have deleted the previous messages, which of course you are entitled to do on your own talk page. So here are some comments for clarity in response to your disruptive edits:

Firstly Pashtun Tahafuz Movement is a factual encyclopedia page about the movement, it is not a forum for promoting a political agenda. Editors are encouraged to add perspectives from different reliable sources, sometimes this may be by using suitable structural sections, or by giving appropriate weight to ‘response’ or ‘criticism’. What is not permitted is adding propaganda or changing stated facts, where the source is not reliable, is engaged in a campaign against the subject or is promoting an agenda, see WP:RS and WP:NPOV. Particular care needs to be taken where the subject may be currently featured in a political dispute or in the news. In addition to this you introduced errors into the template, changed spelling and wording for no reason, and most importantly made statements about terrorism which is libellous and is not permitted, you cannot just add the word “alleged” to justify this.

I understand you are new editor and I am quite happy to look at sources you have to see if there is reliable content that may be incorporated in a neutral way. Mramoeba (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mramoeba: Thanks for more informative, article look stable but i have one concern of adding allegations of affiliations with "RAW" and "NDS" from DG ISPR Asif Ghafoor which is thing could be added under factual encycopedia for "more information of movement"? Ali (talk) 18:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Under the circumstances articles and quotes sourced from ISPR or any of its agents should be treated as not reliable. There is a clear and obvious conflict as they are a media service for the Pakistan army.

Also just to let you know there is a syntax error with your signature which does not lead back to your talk page which should be rectified to avoid confusion with your edit history. Mramoeba (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok and yeah, I have tried but remain the same, I think it will be rectified itself. Alibaba1235 (t) 14:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have left an additional comment on the talk page of Talk:List of terrorist incidents in May 2019 as I reverted but my edit summary didn't save. This explains why ISPR is not a reliable source for this same incident which you added to that page. Mramoeba (talk) 15:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]