User talk:Ahri6279

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Collatz conjecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Law of small numbers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck angle. Since you had some involvement with the Planck angle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck solid angle. Since you had some involvement with the Planck solid angle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahri6279, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Andy Dingley (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From Derived Planck Units can you do same for Schwarzschild Units? Like I did it on wikiversity. MarianGheorgheWiki (talk) 10:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point of view. But I believe that being not the first to extend Planck units, I can ask you to make a separate page for only derivative Planck units. And leave only the most important here. the sources are there on google you will find tables full of derivative Planck units, some of them I made myself. I study physics, and I understand your copyright police and unreliable material. But I don't agree in doing it suppresses the creativity that the copiright denies. here it is theoretical quantum physics, not music or polita. I don't mean to say that anyone can afford to ruin Wikipedia pages now. but if there are experts in the field of those pages, but they have difficulty finding reliable sources, m, to which they can always make a contribution on the merit of the topic. I believe that user Ahri6279 should definitely look for external sources or create an Homepage to use his work that source it. this presumptive material of Planck units has become very noisy in the fact that there are, many units, often also symbols that give us confusion. I would advise not to repress creativity but to give a hand to it to make sure that that material is not lost. Like making a Wikipeida page of unfit sources. out of 6/7 million articles on Wikipedia I don't think they are all within the law of the police and reliable sources. I believe that his material, Ahri6279, is very important for the research of gravitational physics. It is a crisis as today as Covid-19 and the imploding economy, and the deformation and deviation of the news. That does not allow the distinction between true and false. I think we shuold giva us more creativity with awareness of the arguments that the copyrights suppression by force as happens in Youtube or other platforms that does not allow Copyright. Wikipedia is as a last resort for not having this control with wisdom and respect for users to allow improvements and ideas. the page of Planck's units is only in the field of theoretical physics, so it is the only pure theory of those who have dedicated many years of research and publications. I think user Ahri6279 should try type on Arxiv.com library to put his research. so he can cite his sources. with respect and health by those who have been studying Black Holes physics for over 13 years, but here in Italy these topics do not intresting much at all. I have economic and health problems that don't give me time to write a book or go to Arxiv.com for english language problems or the possibility of having visibility. obviously I do not want to offend anyone and your work is important and I respect this page of Planck units a lot but then I have to look elsewhere to have notions of quantum gravity. I apologize if I am emotionally involved but the work that user Ahri6279 did was the same work I did it, even better in detail, with lacks of corrects symbols, but correct formulas. And I cried a lot, for days for losing everything on english Wikipedia. And seeing the same sufferings, like the user Ahri6279, seen repeated like me hurt so much. In a moment like this of a pandemic crisis that man has lost his sensitivity in the next one. To have control of the information that is always change in time and never static has the Copyrights it try to do so each time ( like the law of entropy in continuos change). so I ask you not to lose your brilliant work, the Gauss and Lorentz-Heavise units were already in natural units. Give him the opportunity to post that in-depth table on perhaps other platforms or other Wikipedia pages specific to these issues. with greetings and sincerity. 6 april 2020.

Hi user Ahri6279, I see they try to removed your work. like happing for me last years, now it's going to happing for you. if you look on my Wikiversity I did same work out. if you find on Google Planck units or Schwarszchild units( from metric Scharzschild) you may found out that your work it's already exist. Now you have to focus not more on editing your table of Planck units deriveted, but look for searching source links materias on Google or Arxiv library ( the most important one for physics) or any other website external that they may leaft you your own materials. It's import now, because they may have the action in future to deleted you or block you from editing. Why don't you wanna left your original stuff away or to moved to other platforms like Wikiversity, Schoolarpedia or other place to keep your own brilliant work? The Wikipedia police doesn't allow your original stuff, even so it so greatful that I was doing by myself last years before they reversed my entired hours of works, even in my own account like page talk or else. Your great work is crucial for understaing Planck units and how the universe may work. But still we need to cites our own work. And do not going in anxiety or panic like me. I am ensure that you found your external links to cite your own works. but for now stopped make improvements of page, Planck Units, that Wikipedia's police is danied you. found your external prove, get it focus on found cites to links in it. I very sorry for they reverse you your work. But tell him to keep time to search external cite. has now they told you that Wikipeida page is noisily (by whom?)and less semple to understanding for majors of normal readers. or put your own stuff in a other page for only Planck units derived for more specific elaboratione or more specific subject in topic. can I posisble talk with you in box chat or boxsend or else? I am Cioka-Marian from Italy, and I did lots search on Planck units and Black holes. but nervertheless am just a student without money and with good english or with acces to arxiv or or JsTor or tohers importants physics library. the cultere must be free as he told Aaron Swartz, who die for the freedom of information for make free online a tons of scentif materia. But the world of those holding the copyright( by fews by the way)is not ready to do everthing free and not receive nothing back to keep information and sharing creativity and ideas. Thank god, Wikipedia is still somehow free for now. less hope that wikipedia is not been eating too by copyrights police or control. so in few words I may subjection to find a safe place to keep your work. wikipedia is not a safe one, even so allow you to get visibility but is not made for this. sorry and sincerly MarianGheorgheWiki (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add a reference for the value of k_e on the /data subpage of {{physconst}}? If there is no reference added it will need to be removed. Primefac (talk) 17:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Planck units, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thermal conductance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Per kelvin. Since you had some involvement with the Per kelvin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Thermal resistance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Load, Thermal conductance, Resistance, Conductance, Conductivity and Flow rate

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you recreated Magnetic capacitivity? The term does not exist and was deleted after a discussion at Talk:Gyrator–capacitor model#Magnetic capacitivity. In any case, you have redirected to a redirect, which is not very helpful. SpinningSpark 09:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Magnetic capacitivity. Since you had some involvement with the Magnetic capacitivity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpinningSpark 13:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (molar heat capacity). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (molar heat capacity) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck molar heat capacity. Since you had some involvement with the Planck molar heat capacity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Molar specific heat capacity. Since you had some involvement with the Molar specific heat capacity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck molar specific heat capacity. Since you had some involvement with the Planck molar specific heat capacity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck electric displacement field. Since you had some involvement with the Planck electric displacement field redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck current density. Since you had some involvement with the Planck current density redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck specific activity. Since you had some involvement with the Planck specific activity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck radiation exposure. Since you had some involvement with the Planck radiation exposure redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahri6279

Thank you for creating Orders of magnitude (catalytic activity).

User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please make sure that all redirects you create actually lead readers to relevant information at the target article. This one (and others like it) seems relatively harmless and thus not worth nominating for deletion, but I genuinely don't see how a reader would find this redirect to be useful (which seems to be reflected in its lack of usage history as well). You can find our guidelines for when to create redirects at WP:POFR

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:51, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck catalytic activity. Since you had some involvement with the Planck catalytic activity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:52, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck electric dipole moment. Since you had some involvement with the Planck electric dipole moment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Newton per metre. Since you had some involvement with the Newton per metre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck surface tension. Since you had some involvement with the Planck surface tension redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck wavenumber. Since you had some involvement with the Planck wavenumber redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (wavenumber). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (wavenumber) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck specific volume. Since you had some involvement with the Planck specific volume redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (specific volume). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (specific volume) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (angular speed). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (angular speed) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tesla-metre. Since you had some involvement with the Tesla-metre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck electric potential. Since you had some involvement with the Planck electric potential redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck action. Since you had some involvement with the Planck action redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (action). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (action) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck radiance. Since you had some involvement with the Planck radiance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (radiance). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (radiance) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Watt per steradian per square metre. Since you had some involvement with the Watt per steradian per square metre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck specific charge. Since you had some involvement with the Planck specific charge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kilogram per coulomb. Since you had some involvement with the Kilogram per coulomb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (specific charge). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (specific charge) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (absolute hardness). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (absolute hardness) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ahri6279. While we welcome new expertise, Wikipedia is a collaborative project. As such, communication is required — that is not really optional. Unfortunately, you do not appear to be open to communication with other editors, which is a problem. There have also been several concerns raised with (for example, in many sections above) and about you (for example, on my talk page) regarding your overall editorial competence. You should be aware that, on Wikipedia, competence is also required (which also extends to proper communication). I expect you to begin addressing these issues, first, by responding to my query here, in a substantive manner. Otherwise, you may be sanctioned, including but not limited to being restricted from editing. So, please respond here before making any further mainspace edits. Thanks in advance for your close attention. El_C 18:07, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you continued editing the mainspace without having responded to the above, you have been blocked from editing for 72 hours. Ignoring the above is just not going to work. If you continue to ignore my query, a lengthier suspension from editing can be expected. Please feel free to appeal this block — I suggest you review the guide to appealing blocks if you do. Thanks again. El_C 19:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natural units, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Standard atmosphere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (thermal insulance). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (thermal insulance) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Square metre-Kelvin per Watt. Since you had some involvement with the Square metre-Kelvin per Watt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck thermal insulance. Since you had some involvement with the Planck thermal insulance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck thermal transmittance. Since you had some involvement with the Planck thermal transmittance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (thermal transmittance). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (thermal transmittance) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Watt per square metre-Kelvin. Since you had some involvement with the Watt per square metre-Kelvin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck amount of substance. Since you had some involvement with the Planck amount of substance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (amount of substance). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (amount of substance) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (toughness). Since you had some involvement with the Orders of magnitude (toughness) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joule per cube metre. Since you had some involvement with the Joule per cube metre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:29, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Newton-square second per metre. Since you had some involvement with the Newton-square second per metre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Planck molar mass. Since you had some involvement with the Planck molar mass redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Natural units while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.

Note: see 210.242.153.202 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - DVdm (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]