User talk:AccountableJune

Welcome

Hello, AccountableJune, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AccountableJune, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi AccountableJune! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Enzo Maolucci (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enzo Maolucci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Enzo Maolucci, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgine Kellermann (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgine Kellermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Georgine Kellermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
MurielMary (talk) 10:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgine Kellermann has been accepted

Georgine Kellermann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Enzo Maolucci

Information icon Hello, AccountableJune. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enzo Maolucci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Büttenrede has been accepted

Büttenrede, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 00:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have been cleaning up Josefine Gallmeyer, which is admirable. However, with this edit you seem to inadvertently have removed the {{ill}} template from the page. The template (which is short for {{interlanguage link}}) is useful for articles that not yet exist here but on other Wikipedias. No worries though, I restored it, so this is just a reminder to be careful with your edits. Btw, if you or someone else creates the article here, the template will automatically turn into a link to the English version of the article and no longer link to the German Wikipedia. Regards SoWhy 13:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you are bilingual or speak even more languages, you could also add this information to your userpage as well, so other users both know what you understand and who might assist with different languages. You can use the Babel-template ({{Babel|...}} to create a "tower" or alternatively use multiple {{user xx-#}} templates (where "xx" is the ISO 639-1 code for the language, e.g. "de" for German, and # is the proficiency level (from "N" for native, "5" for professional, "4" for near-native all the way to "1" for barely or "0" for none)), so for example {{user de-N}} could be used if you are a native German speaker. Regards SoWhy 13:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, I was familiar with the inter-language link, but must've not looked too closely and just thought it wasn't linking to anything. And thanks, I'll be sure to use the language template you mentioned on my userpage :) AccountableJune (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I just had that page watchlisted as part of my work on Adele Spitzeder (which is of course my pride and joy) and was wondering about that removal but didn't want to presume familiarity with such a lesser-known template. Btw, if you are interested in editing such subjects, you might want to check out the Wikipedia Library which grants access to otherwise paywalled sources, such as old newspapers, to Wikipedia editors who are serious about improving articles but otherwise lack access to such sources (for example through an university). PS: Impressive language skills. Regards SoWhy 11:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Georgine Kellermann

The article Georgine Kellermann you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Georgine Kellermann and Talk:Georgine Kellermann/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply the article was close to a good article; it does need quite a bit of work. —Kusma (talk) 22:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Sekaquaptewa has been accepted

Helen Sekaquaptewa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Georgine Kellermann

The article Georgine Kellermann you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Georgine Kellermann for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eshinni

Information icon Hello, AccountableJune. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eshinni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AccountableJune&oldid=1209681410"