User talk:Acalamari/Archive 039

Hey just wanted to say thanks for giving me the Autopatrolled thing! Just curious though, what did I do to get it? DonEd (talk) 04:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DonEd, the reason you were given this right is because you were on a list of potential candidates for the autopatrolled userright. However, merely being on the list isn't automatic qualification for the userright, rather, the criteria are: 1. creating a lot of articles, and 2. creating articles of good quality. As your articles fits that criteria, you got the userright. I hope this answers your question. Best. Acalamari 10:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk page. Spellcast (talk) 11:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acalamari -- I turn to you as a friendly administrator, seeking a little bit of advice and maybe some assistance, if you have a moment. You were so nice a few weeks back, you're the first one I thought of.

The topic is the article on Consumer capitalism. User:Mjleknick4 recently added a good deal of text to the article. I reverted it, with an explanation on the talk page citing my reasons. The biggest problem is that part of that text is a copyvio, but it's also unreferenced, unformatted, with smaller subjective issues about tone. User:Mjleknick4 reinserted it without comment. These two entries are his or her only edits, ever. I assume good faith & want to stay encouraging etc.

Could you look at these edits? And tell me what you think? Really appreciate it -- --Lockley (talk) 05:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lockley! Looking over this, I see no problem in what you did by removing the information, and will not object to you removing it again if a significant amount of it is a copyvio (I'm not taking a side by saying that, rather, copyvios should be removed on sight, and reverting copyvios is exempt from 3RR, see the exceptions). The only point I have to make is that it might have been a good idea to have directed Mjleknick4 to the discussion you started on the talk page, as it is possible that the editor may not be aware of it. I recommend removing the material again (as said above, you are not revert-warring by removing copyvios), direct the editor to your post on the article's talk page, and wait for them to respond (they have not edited since you posted to their talk page, so it's fair to give them a chance to respond). If they discuss, that's great! If they keep reverting, do let me know about it. I don't think I've missed anything, but let me know if I have. I hope this helps. Acalamari 10:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

that helps a lot! I'll proceed as you recommend. thanks! --Lockley (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Autopatrolled designation. I plan to keep writing articles and adding info to existing articles. I find sources to verify info.Bill Pollard (talk) 08:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Bill Pollard (talk) 08:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please move File:6azfWv1298759773.png to File:Gabriele449logo.png, thanks. Gabesta449 ^{edits ♦ chat} 21:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, though you might have to fix up the links in your userspace. Acalamari 21:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Gabesta449 ^{edits ♦ chat} 21:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One final request, can you delete File:Gabriele449 logo.png. no need for two file with the same picture. Gabesta449 ^{edits ♦ chat} 21:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Acalamari 21:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I final final request, can you accept/deny my request for file mover. Thanks Gabesta449 ^{edits ♦ chat} 21:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...looking over that, it wouldn't really be appropriate for me to accept your request when another admin, in this case Graeme Bartlett, has expressed a concern. However, he did recommend on your talk page to get the image you mentioned here renamed, so my recommendation would be to go to Graeme Bartlett's talk page and post a link to this discussion and see if it's enough to relieve his concern. Best. Acalamari 21:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the file mover right! I've already started using it. I've always wondered why only sysops could move files. :-) --Jsayre64 (talk) 03:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Though, to be honest, admins haven't always been able to move files: I'm not sure when the ability for admins to move files was introduced, but when I first became one (July 2007) the feature wasn't available. I'm glad it's around now though, and for non-admins too. Acalamari 10:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Cekli829 (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Hydroxonium's talk page. - Hydroxonium (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for your comments on the Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback. User:Coffee has turned down everyone for rollback rights. Something doesn't feel right about it. Bests. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 22:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome for my comments on your request. On the others, however, I have no issues with Coffee's declining of any of them, and most likely would have come to the same decisions on them myself. I'll see what Coffee's response to my comment is on yours is. Best. Acalamari 22:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you grant me the permission? I want to clean up the files in the span of Kylie Minogue. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 07:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Acalamari 10:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for deleting the page Fields(Progressive Rock Band) I stuffed up. I must have had selective blindness to not see that the space was missing. An utterly appropriate deletion after the utterly appropriate move done by shirt58. I promise to look closer next time. Reynardo (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay! It was a minor error, and nothing worth worrying about. I only came across the page because Nima1024 tagged the typo for deletion after Shirt58 had moved the page. No harm done! Best. Acalamari 14:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and for your support. I was actually starting to wonder who it was that some of the supporters were talking about... Funny thing - one of the last edits I made before the close was a non-admin closure of an AfD, and I had to get help! The kid who had nominated his own article had got his capitalisation wrong (which I sorted along with the closure) and also put his nomination in the wrong place at the Log (which I couldn't find a way to get at. The admin who'd speedied the article by this time sorted that out. I've explained to the kid that it's easier to blank the page and NOT to do it again anyway. In a friendly sort of way. Going now to look for my cap and satchel... Peridon (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, per this discussion and the reply, we need to have the article with the original name (Post Bank of Iran) without losing the history of the article. Thank you in anticipation. *** in fact *** ( contact ) 21:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Acalamari 22:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great help. Thank you very much, indeed. *** in fact *** ( contact ) 13:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aclamari. Article Mexico has always been target to vandalism, that's why it was semi-protected indefinitely. Since your unblock, we've experienced again waves of vandalism and they are increasing. May be you could consider semi-protection again? Thanks AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 18:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the auto-patrolled rights. It is nice to know that someone in wikispace appreciate one's work. (Brunoptsem (talk) 17:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Acalamari, I hope I am not violating any rules by posting this, but I have sent you an email and hopefully you can answer, thx so much.

Merian101 (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2011 (UTC)merian[reply]

Hello. It has been over 2 years. Please unlock Douglass MacArthur. Thank You. 69.140.66.37 (talk) 04:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Acalamari 11:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently deleted User:Doug butler/M. W. Holtze, citing CSD#R2 in the edit summary. As a redirect from the Userspace to the Mainspace, it was technically ineligible for criterion R2. That criterion only applies to redirect from the Mainspace. We are trying hard to clean up the cites to the R2 clause so that it's not so widely misunderstood by new users. In this case, there was no harm done because the redirect was speedy-deletable under criterion U1 but if you could help us keep the logs clean in future situations, it would make the education process easier. Thanks for your understanding. Rossami (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see that while there was nothing wrong with the deletion, its rationale was wrong. I'll take greater care in future when deleting such redirects. Thanks for letting me know. Best. Acalamari 21:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, Thanks so much Aca, for making me a file mover. I've been pretty great. :) I noticed that you were absent for the last couple of months, GREAT to see you back. You are hands down my FAVORITE administrator. ;) QuasyBoy 21:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Cool, I didn't know :). Yep, I'm still around. I don't see myself ever leaving Wikipedia. HaaHaa :P QuasyBoy 21:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I know how you feel. QuasyBoy 17:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't create as many articles as I used to, but could I get the autopatrolled rights? Because when I do create some new articles, sometimes I check to see if they get patrolled and often they don't, I've noticed that the legit pages' titles usually don't stand out as much as vandal ones like "brian is a douchebag" which often leads to a patrolling overlook. Thanks. Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, it's because I used to create a lot of shotty articles. Now I don't even really create them very often, I fix existing ones that are shotty to near, or recently, to attaining a GA status. Whether or not a page is patrolled doesn't seem to make that much of a difference anyway. It's really just a vandalism prevention measure. I just happened to come across an autopatrolling message by you on the talk page of someone who was reviewing my GAN and thought I would give it a shot. Daniel Christensen (talk) 20:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure, I thought I had rollback rights, in fact I almost know I did, I notice that when I look at a pages history or compare revisions, sometimes options (ie revert vandalism) are not there, and sometimes they are. Maybe it depends on what browser I'm using. Rollback rights would be convenient, I've occasionally manually done such things by editing an old revision. I have only done one review type thing, and that was a GA review I did while my GAN was being reviewed. Daniel Christensen (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-- and the Barnstar! Bearian (talk) 20:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back somewhat reluctantly and on a limited basis, but I am honestly glad to have heard from you. Nice to be back to work with good folks like yourself. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Acalamari! What should I do?! I have had my User name changed from MelbourneStar1 to MelbourneStar... I requested it. The Wiki page said that All my preferences would be put over to my Name.... I Dont have a watchlist! Whats worse is that, I Dont have my Rollback OR Reviewer rights Anymore!!! What do I Do?!?!?! -- MelbourneStar1 (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DON'T WORRY --- I fixed it.

But, There is still one more problem, to me. My edit count [1] shows that I have made 2 edits, when really this week, I past the 1,500 mark. What do I do? Is it possible for me to get my edit count list back???

Dont worry, again, I fixed that too. Thank You...!!! -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 02:21, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not appreciate you! If anything i think your page should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jh94 (talk • contribs) 20:12, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jh94, Wikipedia isn't for creating articles on yourself. You can put a profile on your user page, but an article on yourself has to be deleted (see the notability guidelines). As for a page on me, my userpage is within guidelines, and "Acalamari" has been deleted before (though I was never a creator of it). Thanks. Acalamari 20:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for fulfilling my request. –BuickCenturyDriver 09:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Acalamari 09:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't expect to be granted reviewer rights, but how wrong I was.--The Master of Mayhem 16:38, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) Acalamari 16:41, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Within the couple of months, I tried to have the article for actress Alexis Fields re-created, the link is currently locked from re-creation at the moment. Both of my requests at deletion review were turned down: [2] [3] Today, I contacted Ms. Fields through Twitter, she gave me permission to re-create the page and I even asked to make her own suggestions in my userspace for her: User:QuasyBoy/Alexis Fields. Other than two minor edits, she said the page was fine. Here are the series of tweets I shared with her [4] [5] [6]. My question is, with permission from Ms. Fields herself, is it officially OK for the page to go live again. QuasyBoy 19:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thanks for the advice. :) QuasyBoy 20:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) The funny thing is, the person (User:Otto4711) that nominated the article for deletion has been blocked for using multiple accounts, LOL. But, one thing I cannot stand is when articles are deleted simply because the article is bad shape which probably was the case with Ms. Fields. Apparently there many deletion nominators that have not heard of cleanup tags. QuasyBoy 20:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I will try to add more, despite my dire difficulties with that. :( About Ms. Fields, I'm sure she will be fine either way. :) QuasyBoy 21:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The feeling is mutual. :) QuasyBoy 21:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acalamari, I've just noticed the barnstar you left on my page. Thank you very much, it means a lot. I try my best so its nice to be recognised for my work. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bro,

I highly appreciate your gesture of kindness towards my self, I will certainly prove my self that I truly deserve this you have have a look on it, till today I have already review two articles which you can see in my profile, I am concentrating on Wikify project these days therefore Reviewer rights are helping me a lot again I honestly thank you for awarding me rights, brother I need your help as well to guide me as I love to be the best in Wikipedia, my dream is that "Mr. Wales" one day award me any Barnstar by his self that would be the most important day of my life therefore if you know him personally kindly tell him that a family member of Wikipedia is your biggest fan and I will prove it.

Yours Truly, --Faizanalivarya (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acalamari, I just want to let you know how I think You've done a really nice job with the books you've created, yes you have! I want to let you know one thing though, and that is concerning the sort_as part of the book. Might you click on the above link and check out the two edits that I've made. Thanks, and great work! Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How's that? LOL! Catfish Jim & the soapdish 09:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just had to fix the blue text. Please revert if my action was not appropriate. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 02:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I see that you're one of the more active contributors to Adele's page. I was wondering, and this is contingent on you having sufficient time, if you could take a quick look at 21 and offer any help, suggestion or edits that could improve the article. I've written about 99.9% of it, and could use a fresh eye before I take it to WP:FAC in the next few days/weeks. Thanks. Orane (talk) 10:07, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for looking it over, and thanks for the vote of confidence. It really means a lot. I'm gonna polish the prose a bit and head over to FAC by the end of the week. Orane (talk) 03:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You semi-protected this article. I want to un-protect Donald Trump, so that uninvolved and anonymous IPs can edit this, which is FUBAR. If IP vandalism returns, we can revert that and semi-protect it again. May I do that? Bearian (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bearian! Whoa...I protected that article over three years ago? I'd completely forgotten about it! Yes, yes, you can unprotect the article, and I appreciate being asked about it despite the time passed. If you come across any other protections of mine that old feel free to go right ahead and unprotect them. Best. Acalamari 17:03, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Angel Heart Barnstar
		I award this to Acalamari for always being amazing. We have never communicated before. And, you're one of the nicest admins I've ever seen. Novice7 (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just stopped by to say hi to Wikipedia's most beloved admin. Just wondering how you have been. Best regards. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 02:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hydroxonium! I've been good! I've just been sticking to article work this month and taking a bit of a break away from admin-related things. Thanks for this! Hope you've been good as well. Best. Acalamari 09:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been good too. I don't want to put you on the spot or anything, but I was wondering if you ever thought of running for another position as you are certainly qualified for pretty much everything? Kind regards. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 19:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I ran for RfB years ago but withdrew it very quickly as it was evident it was clearly not going to succeed at that time. Bureaucratship is the only other position I've thought seriously about because it's an extension of what I already do, and several people have encouraged me to run again. However, I'm not planning a run for now, and I stated my reasons here when RfBs were being discussed in early April. I am very impressed with the current RfB active at the moment. Acalamari 20:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply and for your insight. Thanks also for the link to the discussion. I had not seen that, so I went to the archive to read the thread. I found it illuminating. I too have been impressed with the current RfB and have been following it closely. I hope it is successful and that it might encourage others. All the best. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 21:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Winterbourne, Gloucestershire , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:25, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your kind comments. I would very much appreciate rollback rights, as I normally take ages to check things. I had thought about applying before, but I'm not a great 'computer' person. However, I like to learn new things (slowly). I think the idea of Wikipedia is wonderful and can't understand why people want to vandalise it. Thanks again. Denisarona (talk) 16:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) ^{T or M}/_{Sign mine} 17:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go. You may need to transclude it if I'm not around. Pedro :  Chat  07:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pedro! :) Acalamari 08:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There must be some telepathy because I was looking at 28bytes again only 2 days ago. There no point in a second co-nom, so I'll probably just get in early with my support. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's always said that great minds think alike...though it's also said that fools seldom differ! :) Hopefully the former term applies. Thanks, Kudpung. Acalamari 09:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He he - that made me laugh. Acalamari - I've readded my nom with a link to the original draft just to be petty minded about CC-BY-SA and all that. Pedro :  Chat  09:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All fine with me! Acalamari 09:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Acalamari, I just wanted to drop by here and thank you again for your nomination and support throughout this whole process. I deeply appreciate it. Best, 28bytes (talk) 15:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting this BLP. The claimed birth name may be correct, I am guessing a possible divorce or Mother remarried, but she never uses it and no reliable citations have been produced by the user/users when requested. The boyfriend claim is trivial even if correct. At least now they are forced to discuss. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 09:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that there weren't any edit summaries whatsoever to explain the changes either. You're welcome for the protection! Best. Acalamari 11:22, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acalamari, I've just noticed you've protected Here I Am (Kelly Rowland album). I made the request for protection but realised I made an error, I meant to ask for it to be protected until its confirmed release date of July 26, 2011. Is it possible for the protection to be modified accordingly? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 14:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks for letting me know. Acalamari 14:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe. Glad to see you too in my talk page. How are you Acalamari? --Efe (talk) 12:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My coming back is not "full time" though. How's wiki life? Oh I'm so outdated. --Efe (talk) 14:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acalamari. Might you inform NoomBot about an accidental log-out of (his) user name, thus showing the IP address of 66.228.36.237 instead. Can you please verify that this is indeed the IP address so as to know that it is not a rogue editor who is infiltrating this system. Thanks, and keep up the great work! Best, --Discographer (talk) 00:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Discographer! Since you've already posted messages to the talk pages of the IP, the bot, and the bot owner, there's nothing I can add to what you already did, though I will keep an eye out for a response from them. Best. Acalamari 11:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Acalamari/Archive 039 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Logan Talk Contributions 01:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Logan! :) Acalamari 08:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been watching a bit of apparent vandalism or maybe just poor editing at Bank of Hawaii over recent weeks and helping to keep the page clear of it, as have other editors. I haven't found any specific documentation on the block you've initiated on this user, who is one of three to execute the edits in question at BoH, so I thought I would just draw to your attention to the history of the Bank issue as I've been able to lay it out there. It appears your action is consonant with ours. Thanks. Swliv (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. For the record, I came across the user because I watch the Barack Obama article, and I saw some blatant trolling by the accounts ObamaBanana and aforementioned BananaObama on its talk page. Hope that explains how I came to block the account. Best. Acalamari 19:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. It's a pleasure to see your work and keep on learning. I've gone my (final? for now) lap back there. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 18:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. :) Acalamari 18:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me again. I had thought there was a connection between the BananaObama editor and an IP 65.113.119.85 editor. While I haven't done a close textual analysis, the two I've linked to there are close enough on quick inspection I think to support my thought. Even without proof of connection, though, I'm back because the IP 65... editor has now five successive edits reverted on the BoH page since June 29 and I think on that ground alone deserves consideration for further attention. Clue Bot NG has executed one of the five reversions and signaled that "Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism", but I'm thinking a full block is called for. If you can effect this (or would like more groundwork/textual analysis, say, before proceeding), I'd appreciate your help/suggestion on it. I'm also letting User:SQGibbon know, who weighed in earlier on the BoH talk page on the matter. Thanks again. Swliv (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And again. Aargh. Sorry. I made a mistake -- three different IP#s all starting with 65 account for the five edits. And there's a sixth by a 194..., I think it is. I've addressed the new complexity in more detail over at BoH talk, but the short of it is, I could wait a little longer and see if they all seem to be the same editor, or otherwise a "cluster," as I've thought they are but now can't say with any confidence. I leave it to you. And if you hold off, I'll come back when I have a better read. Sorry, again, and thanks. Swliv (talk) 20:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		I saw your administrator review, so I went to look at all the stuff you had done as an admin. However, I couldn't find anything to complain or comment about in your review, so I decided to tell you to keep up the good work! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have e-mailed you --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Responded, though I'm about to go offline so I won't be able to reply again until tomorrow. Best. Acalamari 21:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Further comment sent to you.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]