User talk:Abhishek Pujari

I deleted the same story some years ago from the same article [1]. The very long discussion also occured on the Helium talk page resulting in the deletion of the claims in 2010. Please read [2] Edit request from 71.227.76.96, 17 December 2010. The claims reocured again in 2012 resulted in a wrong facts in the book of Nature's Building Blocks: Everything You Need to Know About the Elements 2011 of John Emsley. After a direct contact with Emsley I amsure that this will be gone from his next book.

I hope this helps. Editor SBHarris might be a good source because he was part of the other discussions.--Stone (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasons seem legitimate. I was waiting for the same because I am a native of that region and own a house just 3 km from the fort. I haven't heard anything about discovery of helium. This is the reason I asked the author for references before removing it. Or we can just keep it as false claims about the discovery because this might happen again if we remove the information. I guess this author is the same person who tried to put it up few years ago. I tried to contact the author directly but he isn't answering. What do you suggest? Abhishek Pujari (talk) 17:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If they make a celebration day to celebrate the finding of helium it has to be mentioned. The fact that this is not the truth has also to be mentioned. There are several references clearly stating that it had nothing to do with the fort. So lets write what is in the references. We also can quote Emsley, which would be a prominet victim of a false claim.--Stone (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Okay. They do celebrate World helium day on the fort since 2009. So we can keep that as it is and also mention the claims to be false and credit the actual place and time of discovery. Can you edit along with some quotes and references? If yes, then I will keep that info untouched and also ensure that it won't be changed again in future. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 07:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I put a suggestion on the talk page.--Stone (talk) 23:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the page accordingly. Your references are legitimate. I have mentioned about the unverified claims about the discovery of Helium on that fort and restored your edit about the actual place and time of its discovery. However, we can't deny the celebration, as relevant sources have proved that Helium Day is celebrated there every year since 2009. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 20:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Vijaydurg Fort page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, Meet-up for Mumbai Wikipedians has been scheduled on 21 Nov 2015 (Meet-up: Mumbai 21 Nov 2015). I request you to register for the meet. All details can be found on the meet-up page. Many thanks and hope to meet you on 21st Nov. Regards, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JNPT Port.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file has been released to the public through this website - www.livemint.com. Please have a look at this link. If it does not fit the norms of Wikipedia then please put it up for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 14:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC) 14:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rameshwar Wadi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rameshwar Dockyard. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rameshwar Dockyard. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick response. I have made changes according to your suggestions. Also, I have added more information and references. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 20:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rameshwar Dockyard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, anything added to Wikipedia must be based on reliable sources, which does not include commercial sites. Please do not add such content. Thanks,  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with whatever you say. Commercial sites will not be used. I have added additional references from government websites and reports. Please check. Thanks.Abhishek Pujari (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Kandelia page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishek Pujari. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Artist Impression of Rameshwar Dock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cross at the Dockyard.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Docked Fishing Boats.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fishing Hut.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Old Cannon at the dockyard.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rameshwar Dock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sambhaji Angre Samadhi - Front.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sambhaji Angre Samadhi - Side.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stone anchor as mooring bit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Triangular stone anchor dimensions.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Traingular stone anchor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stone anchors lying on ground.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stone anchors drawing.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stone anchors as lintel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stone anchor lying on wall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wafel Beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rameshwar Idol.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mango Research Centre Rameshwar.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Salt Water ponds on Wafel Beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Girye Ultra Mega Power Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ejatlas.org/conflict/girye-ultra-mega-power-project-maharashtra-india. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Abhishek Pujari. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishek Pujari. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishek Pujari. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How can it be that "flowers are solitary, but are also found aggregated in cymes, ..."? If they are solitary, they can't also be aggregated. The original said they "may be solitary, but are also found aggregated ...", which makes perfect sense. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:11, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 06:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Practically all the sources you have add here were WP:FAKE.[3].

In future, please provide WP:Full citations and quotations that verify the content. Failure to do this will be grounds for sanctions under ARBIPA informed to you by Newslinger above. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with view of recent events all over India, it doesn't come to me as a surprise that pseudo seculars like yourself have been on Wikipedia since a long time, running these propagandas against a particular religion. I have already reported such accounts and their activities to PMO office as well as I&B ministry. No use arguing about your fake reviews. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both references were from reputable News Agencies who run news papers since Indian Independence in 1947. DNA and Times of India are proper news sources and not fake. Same sources have been used for other information on the same page. Do you mean to say that a national news agency spreads fake news? Abhishek Pujari (talk) 04:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Konkan Shakti.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Finavon (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Konkan Sevak.jpeg Finavon (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Would you be interested in expanding this specific section— M._S._Swaminathan#Scientific_career? DTM (talk) 12:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I will begin gathering information. Why do you have specific interest in this page and section? Abhishek Pujari (talk) 19:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishek Pujari. You have new messages at Talk:Daulatabad Fort.
Message added 20:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please cite some sources for your change. Or revert. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 20:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I actually just undid the old version by previous user. No explanation cited for that change and just swapped names of cities. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 03:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true; I had clearly left edit summary for my edit that the legal name should come first. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 14:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]