User talk:81.139.160.225

Hello, I'm Jc3s5h. Your recent edit to the page Equinox appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.

Note that https://physics.stackexchange.com is not a reliable source because it consists of user-contributed material.

WP:PROPORTION calls for not giving undue weight to aspects of a subject that are disproportionate. Nobody ever observed the equinoxes as if they were calculated on the basis of where the fictitious mean sun would be. The only use of the fictitious mean Sun was calculating earlier forms of universal time. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Pushing outdated or irrelevant sources at "Equinox".

I deem you to be the same editor who has recently been editing with 81.139.163.204 (talk · contribs). Jc3s5h (talk) 11:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]