User talk:80.3.122.252

Hello, I'm Me Da Wikipedian. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ruskin Museum without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Bluebird K7. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. -REDACTED403 (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User Nigel PG Dale who professed to being neutral has proven otherwise.

He should be blocked from editing the Bluebird K7 page.

His connection to the project he references, and his false accusations made toward the Ruskin museum here : https://twitter.com/otboae/status/1783157616471953524

and again connecting to the project here :

https://twitter.com/otboae/status/1784523445553828011

Are evidence of his bias.

Accusing myself of harassment is a low stoop, any citation I have provided was evidence to balance against his bias. 80.3.122.252 (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

re Bluebird K7 again.

Please keep the editorialising out of the article page. Use the talk: page if you must, but also see WP:NPA. This is particularly unimpressive when you're making substantial, but unsubstantiated, accusations about an editor who's easily personally identifiable, but you yourself have chosen to remain anonymous. You are of course welcome to edit here as an IP-only editor, but it's not a good look to then start making things quite so personal. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bluebird K7, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• That YouTube video is a wp:self-published source. I did not see any reference to GDS on your second citation. Please wp:cite a wp:reliable source. Adakiko (talk) 19:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: If you cite a long video, be sure to state the time where the mention can be found? See {{cite video}} use the "|time=" field. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 19:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bluebird K7. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 17:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I count find the original description but have now done so and edited accordingly by adding the exact text as following

’This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)’ 80.3.122.252 (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Bluebird K7. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 17:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you're adding does not belong in the article itself. Please either take the problem to the talk page of the article, or, if you really think the article shouldn't be included in Wikipedia, start an formal deletion discussion. Joyous! Noise! 17:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks for your help 80.3.122.252 (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bluebird K7 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Your repeated change, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bluebird_K7&diff=prev&oldid=1223773566 is breaking the wikilink to the Donald Campbell page and is also against our style guide for the use of names. Please stop changing this. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]