User talk:70.177.181.129

April 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Dominican Republic on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. VirtualDelight 13:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Dominican Republic. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VirtualDelight 17:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Dominican Republic [1] . Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. This is your final warning if you do it again, you will be blocked. Thank you. 64.131.205.111 21:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see why the link to the edit of this IP address is "unhelpgul and unconstructive". I don't think they are vandalism.Dominican 14:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The source (footnoted) still says 73 percent, so unless you find another source, you should not modify the figures without any attribution. Thx. El_C 16:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can place in a source if you like, but words like mulatto are considered to be derogatory. ^{[citation needed]}

please cite information if you insert it. if there is information that is already cited and you dispute it, bring it to the talk section 64.131.205.111 06:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Dominican Republic. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VirtualDelight 09:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your final warning user:platanogenius [2]. The next time you engage in a personal attack you will be blocked. You should familiarize yourself with Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy.64.131.205.111 21:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.177.181.129 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been falsely accused of using anti-haitian and racist terms. The term " Cocola" doesn't mean " nigger". Cocolos are immigrants from the Former British West Indies that immigrated to the Dominican Republic. The Wikipedia link explains this itself. Administrator 60.131 is still abusing his authority to censor me. Also, I wasn't the one that made the last comment. All these are false accusations in order to censor me. Thankyou.

Decline reason:

Your edits to the talk page (Special:Contributions/Platanogenius) have been extremely abusive and disruptive. I see no reason to reduce the time of this block. Please take this time to familiarize yourself with our policies of Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and I would also suggest Wikipedia:No angry mastodons and Wikipedia:Don't be a fanatic. Because you are blocked on this IP and your previous account, do not edit Wikipedia during this time. Doing so will be a violation of the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy, and you will be blocked again and again. Let the block expire, and then when it does, come to Wikipedia:Editor assistance to try to get started on the right path next time. ··coelacan 05:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Platanogenius for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosicrucian (talk • contribs)

I've blocked you for another week for incivility and disruptive editing. I hope that you are willing to engage in more civil dialog when you return. The diffs since your last block are not inspiring.--Chaser - T 04:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]