User talk:65.88.88.56

Attention:

This IP address, 65.88.88.56, is registered to New York Public Library and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to deal with vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

November 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Elisabeth Waldo has been reverted.
Your edit here to Elisabeth Waldo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/release/2253491-Elisabeth-Waldo-And-Her-Concert-Orchestra-Rites-Of-The-Pagan) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2022

Thank you for your additions to List of centenarians (politicians and civil servants). I appreciate your work to improve the encyclopedia. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 01:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at BlackcurrantTea's talk page. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 02:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Wesoree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Violet Winspear have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Wesoree (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Sidney Poitier. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (65.88.88.56) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Red Orchestra

@65.88.88.56: Thanks for updating those Red Orchestra articles. Nice one. scope_creepTalk 20:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Liliana Abud—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Peggy Scott-Adams! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, 65.88.88.56! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! The person who loves reading (talk) 20:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

The person who loves reading (talk) 20:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Sharon Acker and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! The person who loves reading (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Edith Burnside, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NoNAja (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abdul Masih. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DrowssapSMM (say hello) 19:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

New message from Wesoree

Hello, 65.88.88.56. You have new messages at Wesoree's talk page.
Message added 18:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 18:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Zsinj. Your recent edit to Corey Feldman appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ZsinjTalk 20:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:: Hi. Alternate sources describe Corey Feldman's mother as a "cocktail waitress", "Playboy waitress", and "Playboy model". I will try to fix it. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Alternate sources describe Corey Feldman's mother as a "cocktail waitress", "Playboy waitress", and "Playboy model". I fixed it. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 21:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note about removal of warnings

Following discussion on my talk page, I have removed three warnings previously added by me about removing content, as the changes were done in good faith and I have explained there why I reverted them. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Feeglgeef. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Feeglgeef (talk) 23:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unexplained changes to information on Wikipedia, as you did at Sri Lankan elephant. UtherSRG (talk) 13:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Shadow311. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Edith Mary Hinchley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Shadow311 (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to List of stage names. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

65.88.88.56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribsdeleted contribs • filter log • creation logchange block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I have made no disruptive edits. Some good faith mistakes, possibly. What disruptive edits have I made? 65.88.88.56 (talk) 5:50 pm, 10 January 2024, Wednesday (22 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Looking at our logs, it seems your IP address is either shared or part of a large range that has been blocked to prevent an abusive user from vandalizing our site. Unfortunately, while this adequately protects our site, it does affect a large number of innocent users. You can, however, still edit while logged in with an account. I'm assuming you don't have one already, so you can request one at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Request_an_account To speed this up, it's a good idea to check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth to make sure that the username you want is not already taken. Apologies for the inconvenience this causes, but I assure you large blocks like this are a last resort-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@UtherSRG: As this is a public library, it looks like it's possible for multiple people to edit Wikipedia from the same IP. What was the rationale for a 3 month block over, for example, 24 hours? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The past four months of warnings indicates no intention of behavioral change. The pattern of behavior indicates a repeat library customer as opposed to just the general library population. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What's wrong with this edit? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did I say "every edit is bad"? No, I said there is a pattern of behavior over the past four months. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you show me some examples of edits that are disruptive and clearly harming the encyclopedia? A spot check over the last 48 hours or so indicates lots of good-faith edits. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you not look at the warnings given above over the past 4 months that indicate where the disruptive edits were made? - UtherSRG (talk) 13:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie333: OK to decline. Innocent bystanders could/should push the "create an account" button. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

65.88.88.56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribsdeleted contribs • filter log • creation logchange block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Also, after a glance at the blocking editor's talk page, I believe he accidentally blocked me instead of User:2601:2C1:4080:7170:64AF:5D08:8478:AAB4. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:65.88.88.56&oldid=1201890111"