User talk:65.36.59.228

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jesús Federico Reyes Heroles, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed most of the content you've added to this article as it's a direct copy of this and this. These are both copyrighted websites. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Regards Tiderolls 22:27, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NTox. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Septimus Heap because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. NTox · talk 20:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wakeland High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wakeland High School was changed by 65.36.59.228 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852469 on 2016-11-01T22:59:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grimké sisters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ST47 (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm CAMERAwMUSTACHE. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Megan Thee Stallion discography have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso. Binksternet (talk) 15:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Roddy Ricch, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:172.58.111.37#STOP removing sources from discographies. Here. And you're block evading, which is not a surprise. Tag @RoySmith:, who blocked 172.58.111.37 for block evasion. This user is exactly the same person. Both IPs geolocate to Texas, they're just using their mobile to edit. Exactly the same behaviour, and this IP has been blocked by @NinjaRobotPirate: for block evasion by Rishabisajakepauler previously. Ss112 15:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Kid Laroi into The Kid Laroi discography. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rishabisajakepauler per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rishabisajakepauler. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Trialpears (talk) 01:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]