User talk:2dmaxo

Hello, 2dmaxo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dreamy Jazz, sorry it took me ages to respond. Hope this message meets you swell and thanks for having me. Looking forward to reading you around! 2dmaxo (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Solo chukwulobelu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Praxidicae (talk) 12:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Praxidicae, thanks for the heads up. The article Solo Chukwulobelu has been referenced and the tag removed as the instructions directed. Warm regards and read you around! 2dmaxo (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:CMapIT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://awpnetwork.com/2018/08/06/innovation-in-africa-will-thrive-whether-people-support-it-or-not-founder-of-cmapit-nigeria-speaks-to-the-awp-network/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:08, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A warning was in fact posted on the page, but there is no requirement to wait for a response in such obvious cases as this.

You said Some of our early focus was on road infrastructure, health and sanitation, while we also. You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:2dmaxo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=2dmaxo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your text just told us what your company does, with nothing to show how it meets the notability criteria

• you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. In this case, most of the introduction was just quoting your boss promoting his company, about as far from an independent source as you can get
• there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

For legal reasons, we do not restore copyright violations.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also declare your COI as requested above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Nigeria Football Federation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amaju Pinnick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Benin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Amaju Pinnick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdul Aminu Mahmud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2dmaxo (talk) 12:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC) {{In creation}}[reply]

The article Abdul Aminu Mahmud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take your time, but keep in mind articles have to adhere to WP:GNG policy (see also WP:NBIO). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solo Chukwulobelu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solo Chukwulobelu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Develop Benard Odoh too Nwafor Andrew (talk) 09:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Odoh

One at a time, mate. When I research on him and find the subject adequate to be on wikipedia, i shall begin work on it, but one at a time! 2dmaxo (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

References either don't mention the subject, or they are broken/dead. Please fix that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebenato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ebenato, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Big Drip requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Drip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Big Drip, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Aiyedire has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa Thanks for your instructions. Will attend to it ASAP 2dmaxo (talk) 10:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ebenato, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2dmaxo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:20, Friday, June 26, 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ebenato".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 15:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Lapablo (talk) for the notice. Due to lack of adequate online materials on subject, I have focused on gathering published sources to populate the article, which is still ongoing. I will revert when ready to seek advice on how to retrieve the article if this link is not adequate. Warm regards! 2dmaxo (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ademuyiwa Adebola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ademuyiwa Adebola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 08:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mccapra(talk) for the notice. I have responded on the subject's Afd page. Warm regards! 2dmaxo (talk) 10:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, in what capacity are you related to Ademuyiwa Adebola? If you aren’t, please do not bother to respond to this message. Furthermore, remember to go through WP:COI & WP:PAID if you are yet to & if they do apply, please do comply accordingly. Thank you for your time. Ah! I see Jimfbleak already shared similar concerns, please do adhere. Celestina007 12:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:2dmaxo/Adaku Utah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 06:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Celestina007. The creation of User:2dmaxo/Adaku Utah is in line with the competition call to create biographical articles for some selected persons by editors outside the USA I entered for. It is called September BLT Writing Contest and would end September 30. By your administrative action, it would hamper my efforts to stand a chance to win the competition as I had created Sam Nhlengethwa already and working on User:2dmaxo/Adaku Utah draft page. Kindly advise next steps. Regards! 2dmaxo (talk) 21:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Celestina007. I just noticed the User:2dmaxo/Adaku Utah is live. I appreciate your reversal. Regards. 2dmaxo (talk) 14:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I had nothing to do with that. The admin you contacted refunded the article. I’m not sure who, but it’s them you should be thanking. Celestina007 15:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! It is okay, but thanks all the same. Have a great day ahead.2dmaxo (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Celestina007. Still on the section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion tag on User:2dmaxo/Adaku Utah, I have stated reason on article talk page as directed. However, article is ready and I intend to move it to the main userspace, kindly advise if it okay to proceed. Many thanks. 2dmaxo (talk) 07:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After your article was refunded I wasn’t the one who placed the second G11 on the article. I think it was BrownHairedGirl who did. I haven’t checked to see if the article is notable enough or not, although I’d do that now but even if it is it can still be G11 deleted if you don’t remove the promotional words and statements used throughout the article. Celestina007 (talk) 07:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, Celestina007! Cheers. 2dmaxo (talk) 07:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft, however it does not show how she meets the criteria for notability. Please review these criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adaku Utah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adaku Utah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MurielMary, thanks for taking time out to review the article. If I may, I would like to present some pointers to the article creation.

1. The subject was classified as requiring a Wikipedia page by September BLT Writing Contest which I took interest in and participated. I have also created 2 other articles for the subjects I selected therein.
2. If you find the chance to go through article's history, it has gone through several edits to be fit for publication, which Celestina007 gracefully assisted me with.
3. I am at a loss on which direction to head with regards to the article as other sources cited was advised to be removed, which was done.

Any advise is welcomed. Regards! 2dmaxo (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you come across what WP:OR entails? It basically means you creating your own theory having made certain observations & turning it into a Wikipedia article or writing an article from your own knowledge/what you believe to be “true” , a practice we do not tolerate here as it makes verifiability next to impossible. The linked article seems like a lot of original research was included in it with a bit of WP:SYNTH. There is also a problem of the article being too promotional which could make it CSD-G11 speedy deleted. It is definitely an encyclopedic article with great potential but the named problems are a hindrance, could you work on those aspects? You can start by reading WP:NPOV and removing all the promotional material from the article. Furthermore, the article seems excessively detailed, I can appreciate why because I do understand the complexity of this topic but a non south east / south-south Nigerian & the world at large would find this ambiguous, you can try to summarize long statements in a more precise manner whilst making your point clearly. Celestina007 (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Celestina007, I trust you are doing great! Yes, I know what WP:OR, WP:NPOV and verifiability entails. If you have gone through the references, you would agree with me that "creating your own theory having made certain observations" and "writing an article from your own knowledge/what you believe to be “true” " is not the proper terms to address this effort. Nigeria is sub-divided into 6 political zones and the article is about the apprentice system originated in a particular zone, not throughout Nigeria. The references excludes any instance of original research, and the content of the article specifically dealt with the subject, so I am at a loss where the promotional aspect comes from. Since you are familiar with the subject, I avoided the usage of Robert Neuwirth's TedX talks on the subject (that is not to say another editor would not include it in the future given our collaborative platform). I can only suggest you look at it again as the subject is originated from only a specific geo-political zone in Nigeria, and thus named and referred to as such, and it is encyclopedic due to the curiosity it continues to generate outside this platform. Regards! 2dmaxo (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure what you are saying but you need to re-read my response to you. I said the article was overly detailed & those who aren’t the (south east) Igbo people of Nigeria might get confused as the article is excessively detailed and somewhat confusing. As per the Original research, what I’m saying is basically having cross referenced the sources you provided in the article, some of them do not cover or discuss some of the things you wrote in the article. Those things you wrote in the article without the backing of reliable sources are called original research. It’s as simple as that. I also said trim your article and remove promotional statements from the article. Read WP:PROMO & what Wikipedia is WP:NOT. Celestina007 (talk) 00:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly re-read mine to understand what I was saying as I was responding to your initial response. I have included the creation tag in the article so I can work on the references by citing the {rp} to each of them. 2dmaxo (talk) 00:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CONGRATULATIONS 2dmaxo.
Having contributed 3 qualifying articles to BLT's September Red Rush contest, you have come in 3rd place.
You are entitled to a cash prize of $40 USD.
Please be in touch via email at contest@blacklunchtable.com so we may forward your prize.

--Raggachampiongirl (talk) 18:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please be in touch via email so we can forward your prize!--Raggachampiongirl (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Raggachampiongirl, thank you. I will surely do that! 2dmaxo (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yele Sowore Treason Charges".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yele Sowore Treason Charges".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm sure this foundation does good work, but the coverage doesn't meet WP:ORGIND or WP:ROUTINE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waves of Success Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Waves of Success Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t · c) buidhe 18:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t · c) buidhe 18:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2dmaxo, per your request, I've restored your talk page using content from the archive User talk:2dmaxo/Archive 1. Please note, that you should not have edited the page User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2020/October—read the brown box at the top of the page. Cheers. —⁠andrybak (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am most grateful andrybak. However, my original problem still exist, sadly. I really need to remove the ClueBot archive totallly from my talk page. Please help. 2dmaxo (talk) 11:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2dmaxo, if you mean the archive subpage, then you can put template {{db-user}} on it to request deletion. —⁠andrybak (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Big Drip, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Big Drip".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Extraordinary Writ (talk) I have requested for a refund so edit works can continue on the article. Thanks for the good works! 2dmaxo (talk) 10:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adaku Utah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

For an organisation, it fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. There is no indication of why it is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waves of Success Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Waves of Success Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 16:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yele Sowore Treason Charges".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CommanderWaterford (talk), this article has been converted to Omoyele Sowore treason charges and has been incorporated as a side link to the Omoyele Sowore main article space. Thanks a lot for the good work! 2dmaxo (talk) 11:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jayspiration". The reason given for Jayspiration's block is: "Using Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes: see edit filter log".</nowiki>|3=‪Materialscientist‬|4=10700562}}

2dmaxo (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Waves of Success Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Waves of Success Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Obayuwana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Obayuwana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me... I need help with the link of acceptable sources for referencing a Nigerian Living person. I ask this due to the Draft:Jennifer_Obayuwana article I recently worked on but was denied acceptance into the mainspace, and for future articles I may be creating in future. Thanks ahead! 2dmaxo (talk) 09:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to actually adding the reference information into the draft, then see WP:REFB. If you are asking about identifying reliable sources for use in a draft, see WP:RS. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adewale Daniel Jayeoba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adewale Daniel Jayeoba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 13:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Where is the source for "and in 2016, she was nominated for “Continental style & fashion influencer (female)” Award by Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards?"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Obayuwana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Obayuwana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need in-depth coverage about her, not interviews, her comments or passing mentions. Also, the Forbes article is written by a contributor rather than staff so is not a reliable source (WP:FORBES). Some of the other sources used are also weak (industry publications or publications that exist for marketing/promotional purposes).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Obayuwana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Obayuwana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello S0091 (talk). I had removed some references that was not covered in the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Nigeria/Nigerian_sources like Bella Naija and Linda Ikeji Blog, and also removed the Forbes references as a it was from a contributor, not staff, as stipulated in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. If you could a moment to view Wikipedia:WikiProject_Nigeria/Nigerian_sources you shall discover that the references used for the article are mostly included in the list. The list was recently created and you may have missed it altogether - but as it is, it will be a lifesaver for Nigerian wikipedians to author on more local subjects. Warm regards 2dmaxo (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 20:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adewale Daniel Jayeoba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Awards, titles all need to be cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chidi Anyaegbu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chidi Anyaegbu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennifer Obayuwana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jennifer Obayuwana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chidi Anyaegbu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chidi Anyaegbu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chike Momah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2dmaxo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chike Momah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]