User talk:24.148.15.188

Thank you for lending your time to help us improve Wikipedia. If you are interested in editing more often than once in a while, we welcome you to log in and participate in our WikiCommunity. Mushroom (Talk) 11:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

REad Template:SuperheroboxBrian Boru is awesome 01:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help but notice that some of your edits make the same particular non-MOS errors made by User:Asgardian, who is one of the subjects of a Wikipedia Arbitration. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to reply, and for being so good about it. Since that editor has confirmably used sock puppets before, I felt I needed to ask. Happy Wiki'ing -- Tenebrae (talk) 05:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A geocities Unofficial Guide isn't a good source. The JLX issue itself isn't enough because there are at least five point that need to be addressed to include any Amalgam mention in the mainstream character's article. Thanks for trying, though. (I know that sounds facetious, but I'm serious. I want feedback and we need people double-checking this whole process.) Doczilla (talk) 04:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem. I'm surprised more people haven't been doing that because I can't quite cram all the reasons for these edits into individual edit summaries. Doczilla (talk) 04:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mar-Vell first appears in MSH #12, and battles the Sentry in #13 (look at the cover number.) MSH #18 featured the first appearance of the Guardians of the Galaxy, while MSH #19 was a Ka-Zar story.

Asgardian (talk) 08:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Little Rock Nine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Fumitol (talk) 00:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Recorder (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiamat (Dungeons & Dragons), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiamat (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chief Examiner, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Examiner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]