User talk:1ajs

Hi 1ajs, this is Jesse (J-Man from Skyscraperpage forum). Email me at [email protected] if you want to have lunch or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.216.47.118 (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The second photo is a very good shot of the skyline from what appears to be the Disraeli Freeway. If you could get the Esplanade Riel in that type of shot it would be an exponential improvement over what the article has now. I don't why the article is using a winter picture when the city looks its best in summer. The mint photo is also good though slightly dark. --142.161.162.194 (talk) 00:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Barber house.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Typical, not tipical. :) Padio should be patio. :P Etc.etc. :) Vidioman 06:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Rielbridge.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's still too dark! Look at what other cities are using for their skyline shots and take an example from them. We don't want a silhouette of the skyline, we want a picture where you can clearly see they skyline. vid 12:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had you considered uploading to Wikimedia Commons ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

whats that? 1ajs

Thanks for uploading Image:Winnipeg_rooftop_pano.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

huh?

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ross_house.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://pointdouglas.com/plugins/p17_image_gallery/images/1340.jpg this shot of the winnipeg skyline looks more impressive then any other previously on the winnipeg page and should at least be uploaded onto wikipedia, and if possible made the main picture for winnipeg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jd.101 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi "1ajs": I have been following this article for quite some time now, and happened to notice this change in April 2011 -- Revision as of 16:18, 13 April 2011 by Cmhr mcdp -- about the time that the official logo was also changed at other sites they do control (granted that Wikipedia is not really under their control). The change also appeared at Facebook, Twitter, etc, because they wanted to establish a uniform presence across all avenues. I did notice that the main image on their Facebook page has since changed to the picture of a child's face -- Friends of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights. However, as the Museum itself approved this logo at Wiki, it would be impolite for us to unilaterally change it without their knowledge. I guess that User:Cmhr mcdp would be the go-to guy for that.

Anyway, I think that my compromise should keep everyone happy, as your photo is still prominently displayed (and it is a very good one at that!). If you want this note to be copied into the discussion, I can do that. --Skol fir (talk) 06:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1ajs. You have new messages at Skol fir's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Skol fir (talk) 08:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Barber house.jpg, which you've attributed to pointdouglas.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

huh? i am the person who took the photo. so outa loop all this code tag stuff gets overwelming 1ajs (talk) 13:52, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

im the owner of the image as in i took it and owned the pointdouglas.com domain at the time i referanced it witch no longer exists after a webserve died and i let it go.

i am just seeing this now as i havnet logged in a long time.

the who proof thing of ownership is rather confusing part of why i havent contributed much in a long time 1ajs (talk) 03:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]