User talk:185.252.81.141

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

11:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
PhilKnight (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Maniac Magee have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Maniac Magee was changed by 185.252.81.141 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907446 on 2021-09-16T15:29:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Susan Hill have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Susan Hill was changed by 185.252.81.141 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912642 on 2021-09-27T11:09:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EthanGaming7640. I noticed that you recently removed content from Judaism and abortion without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EthanGaming7640 17:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Tips of Apmh. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thomas Hardy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. The Tips of Apmh 15:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cicely Saunders—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 14:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cicely Saunders, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.

Entranced98 (talk) 14:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Wikipedia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. —Bruce1ee^talk 10:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EnIRtpf09b. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Romantic poetry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. EnIRtpf09b^{chat with me} 09:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Romantic poetry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EnIRtpf09b^{chat with me} 09:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Bold, you may be blocked from editing. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to G. P. Taylor, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 09:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Programme (booklet). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. → αѵίɾαʍ7 ([ʆεt'ς tαʆƘ🇮🇳])← 11:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Booklet, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Skipple. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Howard J. Ford—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Skipple ☎ 14:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at One Man, Two Guvnors, you may be blocked from editing. Panian513 14:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Birth of a Nation. WJ94 (talk) 10:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]