User talk:156.61.250.251

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 18:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC) 156.61.250.251 (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, 156.61.250.251, is registered to London Borough of Hackney and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design‎‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jojalozzo 20:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rocketrod1960. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Drowned in Sound because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rocketrod1960 (talk) 11:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bernard (footballer) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bernard (footballer) was changed by 156.61.250.251 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90061 on 2013-07-24T08:18:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ugo Ehiogu, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thomas Paine have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 13:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Yep. Editor2020 (talk) 04:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Christopher Biggins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Steve Drowne, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Le Marteau (talk) 08:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Steve Drowne, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 08:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...this,[1] it was removed because banned users are not allowed to edit. But you knew that. --←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 03:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

156.61.250.251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There appears to be a ban on the ip of this library. I believe that blocking the entire library Ip is unfair since we are all being punished for the wrong doing of one person 156.61.250.251 (talk) 17:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hard to believe it's a single person, across more than a decade. In any case, if you wish to edit, follow the instructions at the top of the page. This IP address won't be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

156.61.250.251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I humbly request that you unblock the library ip ban since the entire library has been banned from editing. I have already spoken to the staff at the library and they have promised to ensure stricter safeguards so that the previous mindless vandalism never happens. I once again sincerely apologise of behalf of all library. Thank you 156.61.250.251 (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We already have a safeguard, the block. Users wishing to edit should create accounts at home, or request one at WP:ACC. 331dot (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

good look 156.61.250.251 (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The axolotl (/ˈæksəlɒtəl/; from Classical Nahuatl: āxōlōtl [aːˈʃoːloːtɬ] (listen)) (Ambystoma mexicanum) is a paedomorphic salamander closely related to the tiger salamander. It is unusual among amphibians in that it reaches adulthood without undergoing metamorphosis. Instead of taking to the land, adults remain aquatic and gilled. The species was originally found in several lakes underlying what is now Mexico City, such as Lake Xochimilco and Lake Chalco. These lakes were drained by Spanish settlers after the conquest of the Aztec Empire, leading to the destruction of much of the axolotl’s natural habitat. Axolotl

Conservation status

Critically Endangered (IUCN 3.1) CITES Appendix II (CITES) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Amphibia Order: Urodela Family: Ambystomatidae Genus: Ambystoma Species: A. mexicanum Binomial name Ambystoma mexicanum

(Shaw and Nodder, 1798)

Its distribution is marked in red. Synonyms Gyrinus mexicanus Shaw and Nodder, 1798 Siren pisciform is

Shaw, 1802

Siredon axolotl Wagler, 1830 Axolotes guttata Owen, 1844 Siredon Humboldtii Duméril, Bibron, and Duméril, 1854 Amblystoma weismanni Wiedersheim, 1879 Siredon edule Dugès, 1888 156.61.250.251 (talk) 18:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attempt to change spelling or dating conventions in existing articles without first inviting comment and advice at the talk page of the articles concerned. See MOS:ENGVAR and MOS:ERA.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 13:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The era convention in History of the Alphabet has been in place for a very long time. If you want to propose that it be changed, please use talk:History of the alphabet to argue the case. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 13:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and in this version of Runes in January 2016, the spelling "specialized" was used. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I expect you will notice in any event but an FYI just out of courtesy: I have copied your contribution at my talk page over to a new discussion at talk:Runes#Discussion. Thanks. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove citation templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tisha B'Av, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

18:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
156.61.250.251 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

18:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
156.61.250.251 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 48 hours? You're lucky. We've been blocked for TWO YEARS

I just noticed your use of the word "contextomy" in relation to your ArbCom case. You are not alone - see User talk:DigitialNomad and especially:

I don't think you realise the seriousness of the situation. I suggest you read up your editorial responsibilities, starting with this passage from Quoting out of context:

Contextomy refers to the selective excerpting of words from their original linguistic context in a way that distorts the source's intended meaning, a practice commonly referred to as "quoting out of context". The problem here is not the removal of a quote from its original context per se (as all quotes are), but to the quoter's decision to exclude from the excerpt certain nearby phrases or sentences (which become "context" by virtue of the exclusion) that serve to clarify the intentions behind the selected words. Comparing this practice to surgical excision, journalist Milton Mayer coined the term "contextomy" to describe its use by Julius Streicher, editor of the infamous Nazi broadsheet Der Stürmer in Weimar-era Germany. To arouse anti-semitic sentiments among the weekly's working class Christian readership, Streicher regularly published truncated quotations from Talmudic texts that, in their shortened form, appear to advocate greed, slavery, and ritualistic murder.^[1] Although rarely employed to this malicious extreme, contextomy is a common method of misrepresentation in contemporary mass media, and studies have demonstrated that the effects of this misrepresentation can linger even after the audience is exposed to the original, in context, quote.

---

What seems to be happening here is that people are using the allegations that the Duke and Duchess lied about the date of their marriage as a coatrack on which to hang further spurious allegations. An effective way you can counter this is to add to the relevant articles the information that on 21 October 2022 a case was filed in the High Court to confirm that the ceremony of 16 May 2018 was legally valid and the ceremony of 19 May 2018 was legally ineffective. This information was elicited via a Freedom of Information request to the Ministry of Justice - you can cite as a source the reference number, which is 230417063. 78.146.99.84 (talk) 14:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you peruse Wedding of Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles, Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and Oprah with Meghan and Harry you will see that a tag team is suppressing all mention of the matter. If you were to edit it in and take the tag teamers to ArbCom when they edit it out that would be great. Best, @BrownHairedGirl: 156.61.250.251 (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]