User talk:149.101.1.117

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 17:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 149.101.1.117 (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, wdcsun17.usdoj.gov (149.101.1.117), is registered to United States Department of Justice and may be shared by multiple users of a government agency or facility, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation. Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions. Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Robert Sweet (musician) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Robert Sweet (musician) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.maubrecht.wordpress.com/2017/02/28/interview-robert-sweet-part-1/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

I have moved your comment from the article to the talk page - please comment there in future. Many thanks. Aiken D 21:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping clean up the R. Kelly vandalism. TwoTwoHello (talk) 18:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at .243 Winchester. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mikemyers345 (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Secretary of State of Nevada. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you recently removed content from United States Penitentiary, Victorville without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 07:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Your recent edit to South St. Paul, Minnesota appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jeff Jimerson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jessicapierce (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to South St. Paul, Minnesota, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ronald L. Davis have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 22:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BD2412 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The source added to the page since the last rejection references the 351st Civil Affairs Command (for which we have no article as it stands), but makes no mention of a 416th Civil Affairs Battalion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:416th Civil Affairs Battalion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BD2412 T 18:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 149.101.1.117! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BD2412 T 18:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FormalDude. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Michigan Brigade have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ––FormalDude (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sheep8144402. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Edward VIII have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sheep (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cyfal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Reedley, California have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --Cyfal (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mathey-Tissot. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FranklinOfNull (talk) 15:07, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The person who loves reading. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Summrs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The person who loves reading (talk) 19:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DATETIES says that Articles on topics with strong ties to a particular English-speaking country should generally use the date format most commonly used in that nation. For the United States this is (for example) July 4, 1976; for most other English-speaking countries it is 4 July 1976. For Sycamore Gap Tree, this is a tree in the UK, so the UK date format 28 September 2023 should be used. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LuxembourgLover. I noticed that you recently removed content on Lake Conroe despite the claim being well sourced. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary and counter sources. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

LuxembourgLover (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like that you're getting into Wikipedia editing and trying to help others do the same. However, the edit summary was both thorough and accurate:

"Removed unsourced, inaccurate information about the Lake Conroe "Coast Guard base". There is no military base on Lake Conroe, and the sources don't say that. Civilian volunteers with the USCG Auxiliary help boaters on the lake."

None of your sources say that there is a "Coast Guard base" on Lake Conroe, nor support your use of the "military installation" info box suggesting that there is a "Coast Guard Base", that the base was "built" in 1978, controlled by "active" "United States Coast Guard" (not the USCG Auxiliary), and that Flotilla 6-9 is in "garrison" at the base.

Moreover, again, please read the Wikipedia rules about sources. Primary sources, from the subject itself, are not acceptable.

I get that you have a lot of pride in the Auxiliary and your flotilla. That's great. You should. But these statements are not accurate or factual. If they are, provide proper sources, i.e. secondary sources, that actually say what you are writing in the article.

149.101.1.117 (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I changed it to auxilery. LuxembourgLover (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, you literally can't even spell "auxiliary." Might I recommend https://www.merriam-webster.com/ before you embarrass yourself further? 149.101.1.117 (talk) 01:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion. I am a power-tripping weenie.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence? Or is Wikipedia going the way of Freisler's People's Court? 149.101.1.117 (talk) 02:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.