User talk:101.176.22.6

Your recent editing history at Los Angeles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't revert, fact check theinstantmatrix 101.176.22.6 (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you make a derogatory comment here, and here? theinstantmatrix (talk) 20:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you call this snarky comment??? Btw, You didn't get back to me here and I wanted to point out what my edit was and to be clear 101.176.22.6 (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This to me was a derogatory comment. It's like Yup, I keep undoing your edits for my own gain, that's how it works 101.176.22.6 (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To me it sounds like a social stigma, because I did say to John that London was unsourced but tells me New content requires consensus. 101.176.22.6 (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]