User talk:ליאור

Archives
January 2007 - March 2008

Immanuel Abraham concerning the "Beta Israel Wikiproject"

Dear Lior, I would love to be an editor for that page. You Messaged me, and I was not sure how to reply. But definitely, thank you. Shalom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Immanuel Abraham (talk • contribs) 15:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You welcome Immanuel, looking forward to see you there :) Shalom, Lior (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I haven't gotten back to you; I'm travelling at the moment and don't have time to make any substantial edits. I'll be glad to help out with Beta Israel come June.--Yolgnu (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm not your speaker. Don't worry, I too often think that someone I meet on the Internet is someone I know in real life, but they never are.--Yolgnu (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should be a bit more careful regarding genre.

Juggedhair (talk) 21:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you concern. I'm afraid I didn't understand what you mean by genre. Could you please elaborate? Lior (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In second thought, I think you are right. At least regarding Kayla and Abatte Barihun. Both articles require revision - There is no musicological understanding behind the analysis of the Ras Deshen album, and the article about Kayla is most partial. At the Hebrew Wikipedia, I feel more like I'm working in a collaboration in which my bias is eventually corrected, sooner or later. At the English Wikipedia I often get the feeling of "every man to himself", but I'm trying to avoid that recently and sometimes I even succeed. At the moment I concentrate my contributions in Hebrew, but I believe that will change withing a few years. I'll be happy to hear the rest of your reflections. Best, Lior (talk) 22:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are written ጊሽ ዓባይ (Gish Abbay) and ፈለገ ጊዮን (Felege Giyon), respectively. Note that while the "A" in Abbay is an Ayn, it's pronounced like an Alif in Amharic. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 16:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shukran jazilan! I'm still pondering whether to transliterate as פלג גיֹן or as פלגה גיוֹן. If you were to transliterate it to Arabic, will you write فلـﭻ ﭼـيـن‎ or فلـﭼـه ﭼـيون ?

I have two more questions when you find the time:

1. How is Tiya written in Ge'ez? We googled several options but got no results.
2. Is there a village named Chilga anywhere in southern Ethiopia? Esti Mamo told me in person that Chilga is in southern Ethiopia, while both Yechila and Chilga aren't situated at the southern parts of present-day Ethiopia.

Many thanks, ליאור (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Arabic, I would use فلـﭻ ﭼـيـن‎ or فلـﭻ ﭼـيون. The ta-marbutah can be used to show the last vowel if you like, but there is no such letter in Ge'ez or related languages in Ethiopia. Rather it's a consonant like -t/-it (Ethiopian = Ityop'yawi, or Ityop'yawit for a woman; life is Hiywet/ሕይወት, whereas in Arabic it's 7ayyah/حياة). Tiya is ቲያ, I believe, though I haven't heard it spoken by an Ethiopian, I've seen no indication the "t" is an ejective, so it's a straightforward transliteration.

As for Ch'ilga, it's in NW Ethiopia. I don't know of any Chilga in Southern Ethiopia. I would bet money she's talking about the one near Gonder, as there were Beta Israel and Kemant around there, and it's on the historic trading route to Sudan (so those going to Israel would likely pass through it). — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 13:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you changed all Abudraham to Abudirham. If you can't source that spelling, we shall have to revert it, because sources say Abudraham. Debresser (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ליאור (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Debresser (talk) 13:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that you have uploaded some images from Picasa to Commons. I think you take some very good images. So I wondered why you do not link to your page on Picasa :-) --MGA73 (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Michael for your kind compliment :) Could you please specify where should I place the link? Thanks, ליאור (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a must - just a suggestion :-) On your user page you have a section User:ליאור#Contact. If you think it fit in you could place it there. Of course you could also link the other way (from picasaweb to Wikipedia and/or Commons). --MGA73 (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done :-) And thanks a lot for saving my works on Commons from the mighty bot :-) Cheers, ליאור (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to remind you that articles within the scope of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including Gaza flotilla clash, are within the scope of discretionary sanctions due to an arbitration request. Edit-warring on the article may lead to a block in light of these sanctions, as well as in light of our general policy against edit-warring. -- tariqabjotu 17:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please provide a more specific advice regarding my contributions to this article, or is it just a general advice to divert my attention to more important articles (a wonderful advice on its own, I must say)? Because five years of editing in Wikipedia slowly taught me how to occasionally touch sensitive topics as well. Thanks, ליאור (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem with you contributing to the article. It was just that, at the time at least, it appeared as if you were edit-warring over the infobox image. -- tariqabjotu 20:37, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Reactions to the Gaza flotilla raid, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lihaas (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MarmaraBoarding0427.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:31, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lior! I see that you've been adding an update tag using a misleading edit summary in the article Beta Israel (like here). Usually if you are disputing facts in the article and actually have sources, it's best to rewrite it yourself, but if that's difficult, you should place the dispute on the talk page and not the actual page (or at least, both the main and talk page so that people can discuss your proposals). Also, please be careful to use relevant edit summaries. Cheers, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 18:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yan, I'll proceed in Hebrew.

מה שלומך?

תקציר העריכה שציינת מתייחס לעריכה השנייה מבין השניים שעשיתי, בה הסרתי פיסקה שהופיעה בערך פעמיים, וכך גם נאמר בתקציר העריכה. תקציר העריכה הראשון מתייחס לתבנית תחזוקה שהסיר Jayjg ואני החזרתי, לאור דיון בדף השיחה (ראה תרומתו של אמיר לדיון), וכך גם נאמר בתקציר העריכה.

כמובן שנחוצה תבנית תחזוקה בגוף הערך ממש, כל עוד מה שנכתב בפרק המדובר שגוי. אחרת, קוראינו עלולים לחשוב שמה שנכתב שם נכון. בתודה, ליאור • Lior (talk) 19:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hi Lior. I know you have a lot of knowledge on this topic. Please participate in this discussion and express your opinion on the matter. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

• Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
  • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
  • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 21:08, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was planning on uploading the videos too. I'll try to get round to it tonight. Cheers, mgiganteus1 (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nepenthes_gracilis#Videos mgiganteus1 (talk) 05:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ליאור • Lior (talk) 18:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at [email protected] and, second, email [email protected] along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added an answer to you question about pollinators. Just mentioning it here in case you stopped looking for new answers there. Very interesting question. The ability of parasitoid wasps to pollinate is not well-understood, and they are often overlooked, but they do pollinate! SemanticMantis (talk) 17:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating! I've answered there. Many thanks! ליאור • Lior (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What I've mentioned is very hard to show empirically, and it is not specific to braconids. Really, almost any host-specific parasitoid wasp is a decent candidate for pollinating, but I don't know enough to tell you all the families where that occurs. It gets even more likely when the host (e.g. caterpillar) only lays eggs on a specific plant (e.g. monarchs on milkweed). I suppose you'd also have to consider the phenology to see if adults are ovipositing when flowers are open. As for theory, this wouldn't be described by lotka-volterra equations, because the three species have unique roles:none of them are direct competitors, and only two of them are similar to predator/prey. I suspect rigorous theory papers on this topic are very scarce, and making/analyzing a model is probably original research. I happen to be somewhat of a theoretical ecologist, and was recently involved in paper that presents empirical analysis on the related (but much broader) topic of plant-pollinator networks. It has not been accepted yet, but if you are still interested in a few months, leave a note at my talk page or email :) SemanticMantis (talk) 00:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having make ten or more edits to the article on Phineas Gage, or commented on its Talk in the last two years, perhaps you will be interested in the Good Article Review currently underway. I am particularly interested in gathering broader opinion on the following comment by the reviewer: "Many sentences are much too long for easy reading and to my mind overuse complicated constructions ... I will very strongly recommend a copy edit with ease of reading in mind, breaking up complex sentences and disentwining some of the flowery language." EEng (talk) 22:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ליאור. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ליאור. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ליאור. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ליאור. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]