User talk:Арт крихітка

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Silver Easel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 21:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Арт крихітка, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 21:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Silver Easel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mar11 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Арт крихітка (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Can you help me please? I want to create my new article "Silver Easel"(I am an author of the same article in ua:wiki but I can't understand a problem.It seems that it was written with poor English, but its a translation of a profession translator. Maybe the problem is in references? Арт крихітка (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the subject is notable (not sure, you might want to ask on WP:AFCHD for a second opinion) on that but I second the problems relating to tone here. I can't really understand Ukrainian, but I understand Russian, and the mistakes I see in 'Runglish' appear here. I don't have much time these days, unfortunately, but I see what I can do with that. Other advice is that there no lead section. There is nothing to summarise the article's subject at the top of the page. Also the references are without a home, in effect, because they are just randomly placed at the bottom -- what do these references cite?

In addition moving a draft or an article that was once a draft but was not approved by someone into the article space is not a very good idea. Once the problems have been fixed the article can be approved and moved into mainspace. I would recommend using WP:AFCHD for any further queries because that is where more people can see your question. Thanks, ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 11:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mortee was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the detail about the competition should be removed, for example the registration process, the programme, and the detailed descriptions of the judges please see Wikipedia:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:EXCESSDETAIL. Instead, try to focus on summarizing the competition, so that a reader who isn't going to enter the competition can understand quickly what it is, what happened, how important it is and so on. It seems like the competition might be important, but it's very difficult to assess at the moment.

As a side note, if it's possible to include some English sources, that would be great. Non-English sources are completely allowed Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English_sources but since our readers are English-speakers, if the same information can be shared using sources in English, it's more helpful for them.

I'm sorry that it's taken so long for your article to be reviewed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Silver Easel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Silver Easel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mortee (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Арт крихітка,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Brovdi Art for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Brovdi Art.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]