User:Phlsph7/Ethics - Applied ethics

Applied ethics

Applied ethics, also known as practical ethics,[1] is the branch of ethics and applied philosophy that examines concrete moral problems encountered in real-life situations. Unlike normative ethics, it is not concerned with discovering or justifying universal ethical principles. Instead, it studies how those principles can be applied to specific domains of practical life and what consequences they have in these fields.[2]

Photo of surgery
One of the difficulties of applied ethics is to determine how to apply general ethical principles to concrete practical situation, like medical procedures.

One of the main challenges of applied ethics is to breach the gap between abstract universal theories and their application to concrete situations. For example, an in-depth understanding of Kantianism or utilitarianism is usually not sufficient to decide how to analyze the moral implications of a medical procedure. One reason is that it may not be clear how the procedure affects the Kantian requirement of respecting everyone's personhood and what the consequences of the procedure are in terms of the greatest good for the greatest number.[3] This difficulty is particularly relevant to applied ethicists who employ a top-down methodology by starting from universal ethical principles and applying them to particular cases within a specific domain.[4] A different approach is to use a bottom-up methodology, which relies on many observations of particular cases to arrive at an understanding of the moral principles relevant to this particular domain.[5] In either case, inquiry into applied ethics is often triggered by ethical dilemmas to solve cases in which a person is subject to conflicting moral requirements.[6]

Applied ethics covers issues pertaining to both the private sphere, like right conduct in the family and close relationships, and the public sphere, like moral problems posed by new technologies and international duties toward future generations.[7] Major branches include bioethics, business ethics, and professional ethics. There are many other branches and their domains of inquiry often overlap.[8]

Bioethics

Bioethics is a wide field that covers moral problems associated with living organisms and biological disciplines.[9] A key problem in bioethics concerns the moral status of entities and to what extent this status depends on features such as consciousness, being able to feel pleasure and pain, rationality, and personhood. These differences concern, for example, how to treat non-living entities like rocks and non-sentient entities like plants in contrast to animals and whether humans have a different moral status than other animals.[10] According to anthropocentrism, only humans have a basic moral status. This implies that all other entities only have a derivative moral status to the extent that they affect human life. Sentientism, by contrast, extends an inherent moral status to all sentient beings. Further positions include biocentrism, which also covers non-sentient lifeforms, and ecocentrism, which states that all of nature has a basic moral status.[11]

Bioethics is relevant to various aspects of life and to many professions. It covers a wide range of moral problems associated with topics like abortion, cloning, stem cell research, euthanasia, suicide, animal testing, intensive animal farming, nuclear waste, and air pollution.[12]

Bioethics can be divided into medical ethics, animal ethics, and environmental ethics based on whether the ethical problems relate to humans, other animals, or nature in general.[13] Medical ethics is the oldest branch of bioethics and has its origins in the Hippocratic Oath, which establishes ethical guidelines for medical practitioners like a prohibition to harm the patient.[14] A central topic in medical ethics concerns issues associated with the beginning and the end of life. One debate focuses on the question of whether a fetus is a full-fledged person with all the rights associated with this status. For example, some proponents of this view argue that abortion is a form of murder.[15] In relation to the end of life, there are ethical dilemmas concerning whether a person has a right to end their own life in cases of terminal illness and whether a medical practitioner may assist them in doing so.[16] Other topics in medical ethics include medical confidentiality, informed consent, research on human beings, organ transplantation, and access to healthcare.[17]

Photo of battery hens in Brazil
Harm done to animals is a particular concern in animal ethics, for example, as a result of intensive animal farming.

Animal ethics examines how humans should treat other animals. An influential consideration in this field emphasizes the importance of animal welfare while arguing that humans should avoid or minimize the harm done to animals. There is wide agreement that it is wrong to torture animals for fun. The situation is more complicated in cases where harm is inflicted on animals as a side effect of the pursuit of human interests. This happens, for example, during factory farming, when using animals as food, and for research experiments on animals.[18] A key topic in animal ethics is the formulation of animal rights. Animal rights theorists assert that animals have a certain moral status and that humans have an obligation to respect this status when interacting with them.[19] Examples of suggested animal rights include the right to life, the right to be free from unnecessary suffering, and the right to natural behavior in a suitable environment.[20]

Environmental ethics deals with moral problems relating to the natural environment including animals, plants, natural resources, and ecosystems. In its widest sense, it also covers the whole biosphere and the cosmos.[21] In the domain of agriculture, this concerns questions like under what circumstances it is acceptable to clear the vegetation of an area to use it for farming and the implications of using genetically modified crops.[22] On a wider scale, environmental ethics addresses the problem of global warming and how people are responsible for this both on an individual and a collective level. Environmental ethicists often promote sustainable practices and policies directed at protecting and conserving ecosystems and biodiversity.[23]

Business and professional ethics

Business ethics examines the moral implications of business conduct and investigates how ethical principles apply to corporations and organizations.[24] A key topic is corporate social responsibility, which is the responsibility of corporations to act in a manner that benefits society at large. Corporate social responsibility is a complex issue since many stakeholders are directly and indirectly involved in corporate decisions, such as the CEO, the board of directors, and the shareholders. A closely related topic concerns the question of whether corporations themselves, and not just their stakeholders, have moral agency.[25] Business ethics further examines the role of truthfulness, honesty, and fairness in business practices as well as the moral implications of bribery, conflict of interest, protection of investors and consumers, worker's rights, ethical leadership, and corporate philanthropy.[26]

Professional ethics is a closely related field that studies ethical principles applying to members of a specific profession, like engineers, medical doctors, lawyers, and teachers. It is a diverse field since different professions often have different responsibilities.[27] Principles applying to many professions include that the professional has the required expertise for the intended work and that they have personal integrity and are trustworthy. Further principles are to serve the interest of their target group, follow client confidentiality, and respect and uphold the client's rights, such as informed consent.[28] More precise requirements often vary between professions. A cornerstone of engineering ethics is to protect the public's safety, health, and wellbeing.[29] Legal ethics emphasizes the importance of respect for justice, personal integrity, and confidentiality.[30] Key factors in journalism ethics include accuracy, truthfulness, independence, and impartiality as well as proper attribution to avoid plagiarism.[31]

Others

Many other fields of applied ethics are discussed in the academic literature. Communication ethics covers moral principles in relation to communicative conduct. Two key issues in it are freedom of speech and speech responsibility. Freedom of speech concerns the ability to articulate one's opinions and ideas without the threats of punishment and censorship. Speech responsibility is about being accountable for the consequences of communicative action and inaction.[32] A closely related field is information ethics, which focuses on the moral implications of creating, controlling, disseminating, and using information.[33]

Photo of a nuclear weapon
Nuclear ethics address the moral implications of nuclear technology, such as atom bombs.

The ethics of technology has implications for both communication ethics and information ethics in regard to communication and information technologies. In its widest sense, it examines the moral issues associated with any artifacts created and used for instrumental means, from simple artifacts like spears to high-tech computers and nanotechnology.[34] Central topics in the ethics of technology include the risks associated with creating new technologies, their responsible use, and questions surrounding the issue of human enhancement through technological means, such as prosthetic limbs, performance-enhancing drugs, and genetic enhancement.[35] Important subfields include computer ethics, ethics of artificial intelligence, machine ethics, ethics of nanotechnology, and nuclear ethics.[36]

The ethics of war investigates moral problems in relation to war and violent conflicts. According to just war theory, waging war is morally justified if it fulfills certain conditions. They are commonly divided into requirements concerning the cause to initiate violent activities, such as self-defense, and the way those violent activities are conducted, such as avoiding excessive harm to civilians in the pursuit of legitimate military targets.[37] Military ethics is a closely related field that is interested in the conduct of military personnel. It governs questions of the circumstances under which they are permitted to kill enemies, destroy infrastructure, and put the lives of their own troops at risk.[38] Additional topics are recruitment, training, and discharge of military personnel as well as the procurement of military equipment.[39]

Further fields of applied ethics include political ethics, which examines the moral dimensions of political decisions,[40] educational ethics, which covers ethical issues related to proper teaching practices,[41] and sexual ethics, which addresses the moral implications of sexual behavior.[42]

References

  • Robson, Gregory J.; Tsou, Jonathan Y. (31 January 2023). Technology Ethics: A Philosophical Introduction and Readings. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-000-83023-1.
  • Elrod, Edwin M.; Smith, Martha M. (2005). "Information Ethics". In Mitcham, Carl (ed.). Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics. 3: L - R. Detroit, Mich. Munich: Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0028658346.
  • Christians, Clifford G. (2005). "Communication Ethics". In Mitcham, Carl (ed.). Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics. 3: L - R. Detroit, Mich. Munich: Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0028658346.
  • Hall, Edward; Sabl, Andrew (13 September 2022). Hall, Edward; Sabl, Andrew (eds.). Political Ethics: A Handbook. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-23131-0.
  • Gay, William C. (2006). "A Normative Framework for Addressing Peace and Related Global Issues". In Boersema, David; Brown, Katy Gray (eds.). Spiritual and Political Dimensions of Nonviolence and Peace. Rodopi. ISBN 978-90-420-2061-0.
  • Boonin, David (8 February 2022). "1. Introduction: Sex, Ethics, and Philosophy". In Boonin, David (ed.). The Palgrave Handbook of Sexual Ethics. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-87786-6.
  • Maxwell, Bruce (2023). "Educational Ethics". In Poff, Deborah C.; Michalos, Alex C. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-22767-8.
  • Sorabji, Richard; Rodin, David (2007). "Introduction". In Sorabji, Richard; Rodin, David (eds.). The Ethics of War: Shared Problems in Different Traditions (Repr ed.). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 9780754654483.
  • Lazar, Seth (2020). "War". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
  • Frowe, Helen (2021). "The ethics of war". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
  • Mitcham, Carl (2 August 2022). Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-82539-7.
  • Almond, Brenda (1998). "Applied ethics". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L005-1. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
  • Dittmer, Joel. "Ethics, Applied". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
  • Petersen, Thomas Søbirk; Ryberg, Jesper (2022). "Applied Ethics". Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
  • Winkler, E. R. (1 January 1998). "Applied Ethics, Overview". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Braunack-Mayer, A. J.; Street, J. M.; Palmer, N. (1 January 1998). "Technology, Ethics of: Overview". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Airaksinen, T. (1 January 1998). "Professional Ethics". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Fotion, N. (1 January 1998). "Military Ethics". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Rendtorff, J. D. (1 January 1998). "Business Ethics, Overview". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Sandler, R. (1 January 1998). "Environmental Ethics, Overview". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Delden, J. J. M. van (1 January 1998). "Euthanasia (Physician-Assisted Suicide)". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Gillon, R. (1 January 1998). "Bioethics, Overview". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2.
  • Beaucham, Tom L. (2003). "The Nature of Applied Ethics". In Frey, R. G.; Wellman, Christopher Heath (eds.). A Companion to Applied Ethics. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-7190-8.
  • Darwall, Stephen L. (2003). "Theories of Ethics". In Frey, R. G.; Wellman, Christopher Heath (eds.). A Companion to Applied Ethics. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-7190-8.
  • Ryberg, Jesper (1 June 2010). Applied Ethics: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-980865-6.
  • Meynell, Letitia; Paron, Clarisse (16 June 2023). Applied Ethics Primer. Broadview Press. ISBN 978-1-77048-899-1.
  • Chakraborti, Chhanda (17 September 2023). Introduction to Ethics: Concepts, Theories, and Contemporary Issues. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-981-99-0707-6.
  • Gordon, John-Stewart. "Bioethics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
  • Wilson, Scott D. "Animals and Ethics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 24 December 2023.
  • Holmes, Robert L. (2018). Introduction to applied ethics. London Oxford New York New Delhi Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1-3500-2980-4.
  • Francione, Gary L. (1 April 2004). "Animals - Property or Persons?". In Sunstein, Cass R.; Nussbaum, Martha C. (eds.). Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-803473-5.
  • Yount, Lisa (2007). Animal Rights. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4381-3063-7.
  • Brennan, Andrew; Lo, Norva Y. S. (2022). "Environmental Ethics". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 24 December 2023.
  • Cochrane, Alasdair. "Environmental Ethics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 24 December 2023.
  • Smith, Kimberly K. (10 April 2018). Exploring Environmental Ethics: An Introduction. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-77395-7.
  • Dueñas, María del Pilar Muñoz; Lucia, Aiello; Rosario, Cabrita; Mauro, Gatti (23 February 2018). Corporate Social Responsibility for Valorization of Cultural Organizations. IGI Global. ISBN 978-1-5225-3552-2.
  • Catalano, George D. (1 June 2022). Engineering Ethics: Peace, Justice, and the Earth, Second Edition. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-031-02115-2.
  • Parker, Christine; Evans, Adrian (22 February 2007). Inside Lawyers' Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-46128-3.
  • Medvecky, Fabien; Leach, Joan (1 November 2019). An Ethics of Science Communication. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-32116-1.
  • Mentan, Tatah (3 January 2022). Understanding Contemporary Journalism: A Handbook of Principles and Practice. African Books Collective. ISBN 978-9956-552-91-7.
  • Patching, Roger; Hirst, Martin (20 November 2013). Journalism Ethics: Arguments and cases for the twenty-first century. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-96374-5.
  • Kvalnes, Øyvind (2023). "Communication Ethics". Communication Climate at Work: Fostering Friendly Friction in Organisations. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-031-28971-2.
  • ten Have, Henk; Patrão Neves, Maria do Céu (2021). "Information Ethics". Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-54161-3.
  • Tzafestas, Spyros G. (27 July 2015). Roboethics: A Navigating Overview. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-21714-7.
  • Wolfendale, Jessica (2007). "Professional Ethics and the Military". Torture and the Military Profession. Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN 978-0-230-59280-3.
  • Baumann, Dieter (December 2007). "Military Ethics: A Task for Armies". Military Medicine. 172 (Supplement 2). doi:10.7205/MILMED.173.Supplement_2.34.
  1. ^
    • Darwall 2003, p. 17
    • Chakraborti 2023, p. 619–620
  2. ^
    • Almond 1998, Lead Section, § 1. Definitions
    • Dittmer, Lead Section, § 1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics
    • Petersen & Ryberg 2022
    • Winkler 1998, pp. 174–175
  3. ^ Winkler 1998, pp. 175–176
  4. ^ Beaucham 2003, pp. 7–9
  5. ^
    • Beaucham 2003, pp. 7–9
    • Winkler 1998, p. 176–117
    • Almond 1998, § 2. Theory and practice
  6. ^ Almond 1998, § 2. Theory and practice
  7. ^ Almond 1998, § 1. Definitions
  8. ^
    • Ryberg 2010, p. 3
    • Meynell & Paron 2023, p. 11
    • Chakraborti 2023, p. 620
    • Winkler 1998, pp. 174–175
  9. ^
    • Dittmer, § 3. Bioethics
    • Gordon, Lead Section
    • Gillon 1998, pp. 267–268
  10. ^
    • Gordon, Lead Section, § 4. The Idea of Moral Status in Bioethics
    • Dittmer, § 4a. Theories of Moral Standing and Personhood
  11. ^
    • Holmes 2018, pp. 288–289
    • Gordon, § 3d. Environmental Ethics
  12. ^
    • Dittmer, § 3. Bioethics
    • Gordon, Lead Section, § 1. Preliminary Distinctions
  13. ^ Gordon, Lead Section, § 3a. Introduction
  14. ^ Gordon, Lead Section, § 3b. Medical Ethics
  15. ^
    • Dittmer, § 3. Bioethics
    • Gordon, Lead Section, § 3b. Medical Ethics
  16. ^
    • Dittmer, § 3. Bioethics
    • Delden 1998, pp. 200–201
  17. ^ Gordon, Lead Section, § 3b. Medical Ethics
  18. ^
    • Wilson, Lead Section
    • Gordon, Lead Section, § 3c. Animal Ethics
    • Holmes 2018, pp. 317–319
  19. ^ Holmes 2018, pp. 333–334
  20. ^
    • Francione 2004, pp. 115–116
    • Yount 2007, p. 26
  21. ^
    • Gordon, § 3d. Environmental Ethics
    • Sandler 1998, pp. 105–106
    • Brennan & Lo 2022, Lead Section
  22. ^
    • Brennan & Lo 2022, § 1. Introduction: The Challenge of Environmental Ethics
    • Gordon, § 3d. Environmental Ethics
  23. ^
    • Gordon, § 3d. Environmental Ethics
    • Cochrane, § 2. Radical Ecology
    • Smith 2018, p. 36
  24. ^
    • Rendtorff 1998, pp. 365–366
    • Dittmer, § 2. Business Ethics
  25. ^
    • Dueñas et al. 2018, pp. xv–xvi
    • Dittmer, § 2. Business Ethics
    • Rendtorff 1998, pp. 365–366
  26. ^
    • Rendtorff 1998, pp. 365–366
    • Dittmer, § 2. Business Ethics
  27. ^
    • Airaksinen 1998
    • Dittmer, § 5. Professional Ethics
  28. ^ Airaksinen 1998, pp. 617–620
  29. ^ Catalano 2022, p. 17
  30. ^ Parker & Evans 2007, pp. 22–23
  31. ^
    • Medvecky & Leach 2019, p. 35
    • Mentan 2022, p. 280
    • Patching & Hirst 2013, p. 69
  32. ^
    • Kvalnes 2023, pp. 101, 105
    • Christians 2005
  33. ^
    • ten Have & Patrão Neves 2021, p. 633
    • Elrod & Smith 2005
  34. ^ Braunack-Mayer, Street & Palmer 1998, pp. 321–322
  35. ^
    • Braunack-Mayer, Street & Palmer 1998, pp. 323–326
    • Robson & Tsou 2023, pp. 16–17
  36. ^
    • Tzafestas 2015, p. 2
    • Mitcham 2022, p. 101
  37. ^
    • Frowe 2021, Lead Section
    • Lazar 2020, Lead Section, § 3. Jus ad Bellum, § 4. Jus in Bello
    • Sorabji & Rodin 2007, pp. 2–3
  38. ^
    • Wolfendale 2007, pp. 47–78
    • Baumann 2007, pp. 34–35
  39. ^ Fotion 1998, pp. 121, 123–124, 126
  40. ^
    • Hall & Sabl 2022, pp. 1–2
    • Gay 2006, p. 189
  41. ^ Maxwell 2023, pp. 609–610
  42. ^ Boonin 2022, p. 1
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Phlsph7/Ethics_-_Applied_ethics&oldid=1191943389"