User:Milowent/Sandbox5

I have no idea if I will do anything with this, but the temptation to see if I can actually quell the drama in some fashion is rather great. Anyone reading here, please help me find coordinates for Zack, Texas.

Qualified past support for M/EC

• Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement#Statement_By_Milowent
• Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive601#Unblock_of_Malleus_Fatuorum_by_Moni3

Concerns of EC

• Jimbo banned him from talk page? Maligns him?

• User_talk:Eric_Corbett#An_absolute_disgrace - what is source of this (EC posts to his talk page on 25 Sept)
• User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Returning_to_the_point - Giano starts asking Jimbo for proof of who EC has run off the project (30 Sept, 18:41), reposts it on 2 Oct 18:22 (where I cited JayHenry's vote, the worst thing I ever saw Jay write about anybody on the project), reposts it again on 2 Oct 19:38. Jimbo has not responded as of 21:00 3 Oct.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Problematic events

• the "fucking cunt" crap

Search terms

• "Corbett" appears on 28 User Talk archived Jimbo pages, do I have time to review?[1]
• "Malleus" appears on 31 archive pages.[2]
• I appear on 18 pages.[3], so this can just be comments.
• Everything search "malleus uncivil" has 1,333 results.[4]
• Everything search for "milowent uncivil" has 308 results.[5]

Block logs

• Malleus was "blocked" 23 times (hard to generalized because some wars over this have occurred). [6]

2007

• RFA 1 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Malleus Fatuarum (Nov 2007) (Vote: 19/11/3 before withdrawal)

• M's withdrawal comment: "I have been rather shocked by the reaction to my nomination, much of which I feel to have been very unfair. I accepted the nomination in good faith, believing that I might be able to help in some areas of wikipedia administration. But it is apparent to me now that I am not considered sufficiently trustworthy by a significant body of editors and so I am withdrawing from this nomination."

• M/EC responded to first oppose vote insinuating some bias of the voter. That voter included some diffs regarding concern about behavior as well.

• User_talk:Eric_Corbett/Archives/2007/November#That_was_rude. Editor Wrad wrote Nov 2007: "What you said was really demeaning and humiliating to me. I wasn't trying to hurt you, but you had to point out every little thing I did wrong. I just had an idea and was really trying to communicate it. Apparently it was dumb, but you didn't have to act the way you did. If you want to point out my grammatical problems at FAC, fine, but doing it on a talk page is rude and demeaning and belittling and serves no purpose at all. You knew what I meant by "more vital". Everyone did. Thanks for crushing my spirit today, even if it was inadvertently." Next time, try to help, not hurt, with your criticism. Okay? But apparently you have a reputation for not being very nice, so what I'm saying isn't going to stick anyway."

• M's response included: "Perhaps next time you'll think twice before using phrases like "How hard is that to understand?" when trying to explain your ideas in that case....." And then Wrad said in part: " Next time, try to help, not hurt, with your criticism. Okay? But apparently you have a reputation for not being very nice, so what I'm saying isn't going to stick anyway." M/EC responded one further unkindly.

• Wrad has maybe 20 edits in 2014 (last 20 May 2014)

2008

• RFA 2 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Malleus Fatuarum 2.

2014

• User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_168#Rebooted_discussion, 29 July, see John Cline at 20:14 29 July, what is this referring to?

• Khazar2 on 3 October at User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Returning_to_the_point says, yes, the behavior of Eric and others drove him off the project. He documented it in Dec 2013 at User:Khazar2/leaving.