User:Mabeenot/links
Bookmarks
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities/COTM
- Template:UniversitiesCOTM
- Category:Wikipedians by alma mater
- WikiProject Toolserver
For GA reviews
- Checklinks (check external links and citation parameters)
- Contributors (sortable page version history)
- Linkcount (report the page types wikilinked to)
- Readability (readability analysis)
- WPPageHistStat (edit history overview)
Criteria:
1. Well-written:
- (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation
2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
- (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout
- (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
- (c) it contains no original research
3. Broad in its coverage:
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
- (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions