User:Luisa9544/Michael Spencer (engineer)/Devin Stangle Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Luisa9544, Michael248, Sethm2036
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Luisa9544/Michael Spencer (engineer)
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
There are no picture yet added but the tone of the paper is neutral and the use of wiki links were limited to the start but were not added through the rest of the article. I also like how they separated the articles and the sections headers before the paragraphs were short but told the person what they were reading about. I like how they separated work and research so they can put a greater focus into each instead of just saying his research was a part of their work. The 4 links I believe were the ones they were provided and I do not think they added their own yet.