User:Evilphoenix/RfA Votes/Master Jay

• Neutral. I'm trying out a new (rather tedious) system I've come up with for evaluating RfA's. I may use this from now on, I may never use it again. So, after going through all this, I ended up with Neutral, per my evaluation of Master Jay by my personal criteria. Best regards, Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 05:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Time on Wikipedia: Box 4, 16 Points
Edit Quantity: Box 4, 8 Points
Edit Distribution:

1. Notable amount of non-trivial Mainspace contributions. - some.
2. Vandal reversion in the Mainspace. - yes.
3. Participation in New Page patrolling. - not found
4. Participation in User Talk discussion.
   1. Placing Vandal Warning templates. -yes
   2. Topical discussion. -not found
5. Participation on Article Talk pages. -no
6. Participation in Articles for Deletion discussion, and/or MfD, CfD, DRV, and RfD. -yes

Mainly vandal reversion.Low Box 4, 7 points.

User Page: Clean, visually appealing User Page. (5) May contain a modest amount of Userboxes. (5) If present, does not contain an excessive amount of biographical information about user.(4) Does not really give a good description of User's contributions to Wikipedia. (3) Contains no spelling errors or awkward grammar. Contains no personal attacks or offensive content. (5). Overall, Box 4, 7 points.

User Talk Page: Active, well used Discussion Page. Provides organized Archives to all prior discussion. User is engaged enough in the community to have several Archives (5). Discussion on page demonstrates that User is helpful and available to help other Users with questions, polite to Users with critiques and complaints, and calm in dealing with trolling. User is sought for advice on their Talk page. (4) Thank you notices for RfA voting comprise a significant majority of content on their Talk page.(2). Overall, Box 4. 7 points.

Grammar: User demonstrates excellent grammar in all contributions and in most discussion. 8 Points.

RfA behaviour: Decent nomination introduction.(3) Good answers to RfA questions.(3) "Decent"(by my personal opinions) answers to RfA questions(2).Polite interaction with all users. Does not challenge or question Oppose voters on RfA page.(5). RfA subpage transcluded to RfA with edit summary.(4) Challenges RfA voters on their Talk Page.(2) aggregated, 3, 3, 2, 5, 4, 2. Overall, Box 3. 5 Points.

Personal Knowledge of User: Box 3, I have heard of this User before, but have not directly interacted. 10 Points

Total: 16, 8, 7, 7, 7, 8, 5, 12. Total = 68. Neutral.