Template talk:Real estate in the United Kingdom

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United Kingdom This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Law This template is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Economics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Business This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Discussion about this template here:

• User talk:Jimbo Wales#Are we now a Yellow Pages for U.K. Realty.3F
• Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Are we now a Yellow Pages for U.K. Realty.3F

--David Tornheim (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose we delete all the free advertising of the various companies, periodicals, non-profits, etc. in this template and only include encyclopedic topics. --David Tornheim (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose it look more like this:

†

--David Tornheim (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]