Template talk:Prehistoric caves

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prehistoric caves template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Archaeology Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This template was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Modèle:Palette Grottes ornées from the French Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. (This notice applies to version 731345284 and subsequent versions of this page.)

This template was considered for deletion on 2016 September 20. The result of the discussion was "Kept".

Hi! Is it really necessary to separate Jersey from the UK? We better keep it as compact as possible. ATBWikirictor (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Jersey isn't part of the UK. My instinct would be to merge them and risk the ire of the Islanders, though... Joe Roe (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the only relevance of modern states to the subject is their custody of the sites, their flags seem to me of dubious value: the country names ought to be enough. Moreover, one concern being expressed at TfD is the template’s size, and I expect removing the graphics would make it look considerably smaller and less imposing. See also MOS:FLAG.—Odysseus1479 06:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AgreeWikirictor (talk) 08:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely, they should go. Doug Weller talk 18:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Agreed. Joe Roe (talk) 23:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Skysmith's list of missing articles/Archaeology and Paleontology#Caves (kudos to Skysmith) for a list of cave sites that might be created and added to this template. – Joe (talk) 12:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! ATBWikirictor (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! All articles of the Europe section have an info-box now - and the Template:Prehistoric caves, of course. If i missed something, let me know, please. I used the Ancient Site box, because it has the best parameters and looks better (i hate the dirt-brown background on top of the Cave info-box), but I didn't replace the existing info-boxes. There are a few caves left in Spain, where i should add the UNESCO info, though. However....i move on to Asia now. All the best Wikirictor 11:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - i generated coordinates with THIS tool. All the best Wikirictor 11:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the link to Cueva de las Manos be titled as such in the template, instead of being shown as "Las Manos" as it's currently presented? Tyrone Madera (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've went ahead and made the change from "Las Manos" to "Cueva de las Manos" Tyrone Madera (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone with experience with editing the template add Los Toldos (Santa Cruz) to the list? Thanks! Tyrone Madera (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]