This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This template is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This template was considered for deletion on 30 August 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".
Flags
What is the point with all these flags? IMO they just make it more difficult to read. Aaker 20:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like a circus show. --Qyd 20:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Republic of Macedonia
It should be Republic of Macedonia 89.205.35.11 (talk) 14:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed category change
The category generated by this template is up for renaming (see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 March 18). If this proposal is accepted I would alter the template code slightly to make membership of the category parameter-dependent.--Kotniski (talk) 13:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Louisiana
Louisiana is included in this template. Why? --Son (talk) 03:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. Because it is! --76.99.45.253 (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why Russia?
Why is Russia included as an observer? It is not mentioned to be on the "Francophonie" wikipedia page, and neither in the map. --RohanDhruva (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Flag
Should a small flag of Francophonie be added to this template? There is one on the corresponding article. --BozMotalk 21:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]