Template talk:Islam in South Asia

WikiProject iconIslam Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSouth Asia NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.
NAThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Barelvi and Deobandi aren't organizations

I noticed that Barelvi and Deobandi are listed as organizations, which isn't accurate. Organizations such as Dawat e Islami and Tablighi Jamat adhere to Barelvism or Deobandism, which are broader ideological movements. With that in mind, I will move them up to the section for general ideologies, next to Wahhabism which is also a movement. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, Barelvi and Deobandi are ideologies. I have also removed Tablighi Jamat and Jamaat-e-Islami Hind which don't fall under Political Islam. I am not sure if Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan participates in politics like Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh. Buzzzman (talk) 16:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Events and controversies

The Hindu-Muslims conflicts/riots/violence and blasts in Hindu-dominated areas are WP:OR labelled as Islamism. So removing them, please add references here to prove they are thought to be acts of Islamism movements before adding. Thanks, --Benfold (talk) 05:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

disorganised?

What order are the links displayed in? There's been a recent addition of a duplicate link and edit-warring over its removal, but it's not surprising given the wall of text of apparently randomly-arranged links. Could they be subdivided in some way or, failing that, put into A-Z order? Thanks. PamD 07:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that edit warring over the removal. That was my mistake. The editor was doing a string of questionable edits (including modifying a closed AfD and an RPF archive), there was no edit summary and in the clutter I didn't realise there was a duplicate link. Coming back to the point, some of the organisations are clearly based on one country, while others are pan-South Asia. How about a country based classification? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Did a partial classification. Some of the organisation were hard to classify, so I just put in "Others". --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template name

Template name should move from Template:Islamism in South Asia to Template:Islam in South Asia because these all are related to Islam not Islamism. Some might be related to Islamism but majority of them are related to Islam. Hasan (talk) 04:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Islam_in_South_Asia&oldid=1033041791"