Template talk:Coronavirus characteristics comparison

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

COVID-19 This template is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles Medicine: Pulmonology This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles This template is supported by the Pulmonology task force. Viruses This template is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles

Esiymbro Wouldn't it make more sense to order the three chronologically rather than alphabetically? –xeno^talk 12:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking more about the similarity as SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 belong to the same species. The article's "Human Coronaviruses" section uses this order as well. Both orders are fine for me. Esiymbro (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Esiymbro That makes sense too. Thanks for the response. –xeno^talk 13:38, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]