Template talk:Campaignbox Western Front (World War I)

Military history: World War I Template‑class

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Template This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  World War I task force

I have reduced the number of battles in the campaign box to only those of consequence for the war as a whole. I was unable to consolidate the 2nd Artois/2nd Champagne/Loos joint French-British offensive as no article or quality exists. For the Neville Offensive I have left both Arras & 2nd Aisne articles, as the Arras page is of high quality article and I was unable to find a method to denote that they were a combined effort in the template.

Removed were battles that have POV or are included for national reason. This includes:

• Haelen - is part of Battle of the Frontiers
• Great Retreat - because of POV and focused on 1st Marne.
• Battle of Neuve Chapelle - could be re-added as it was a distinct for the artois offensive
• Hill 70 - predominantly Canadian action, like Vimy Ridge
• Hulluch - was a heavy gas attack but not a major battle
• Mont Sorrel - localized Ypres attack of primarily Canadian importance
• Battle of Vimy Ridge - an article which I have placed a great deal of effort into but recognize was part of the Battle of Arras
• Battle of the Lys - part of Spring Offensive
• Third Battle of the Aisne - part of Spring Offensive
• Battle of Belleau Wood - part of Spring Offensive, likely included because of U.S. Marines involvement
• Battle of Château-Thierry (1918) - part of Spring Offensive
• Battle of Hamel - small battle

Thoughts?

--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. According to WP, the Battle of the Frontiers started at August 14. Haelen was on August 12. So should we change the dates on the Frontiers-page, so we can insert Haelen?Jeff5102 (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the move and put Haelen under the Battle of the Frontiers campaign box. I guess changes over ther would be needed as Mulhouse is even before Haelen Labattblueboy (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Small campaign box created for 2nd Artois--Labattblueboy (talk) 03:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any readings I've seen do not note the conflict surrounding Fort Vaux as being a major subsidiary battle of Verdun. Consequently, I don't see it appropriate to include it in the infobox, which is reserved for the most major battles. --Labattblueboy (talk)

I think that when the Verdun article has the German offensive of 1914, the French offensives of late 1916, August 1917 and late 1918 as sub-articles, they can have an infobox and things like Vaux and Douaumont can go in 'Associated articles'. I'll get round to it, one day....Keith-264 (talk) 08:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 10:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]