Template talk:Airbus airliners timeline

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This template is supported by the aircraft project.

Hi,

Does anyone think its worth adding a line for the A320 neo?

Thanks

The color of narrow body production (dark gray) is similar to that of no production (light gray). So, I suggest changing one, preferably of narrow body. Rihaz (talk) 02:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I been bold and have made some large changes to the template. Feel free to discuss them here.

To summarise, I have included only the family of aircraft, removing individual variants such as the A319 and A321. If these are included, all variants all aircraft (such as A330-200 and -300) should be. I have placed ceo and neo families on different lines, as in the case of both the A320 and the A330, both are in production simultaneously for many years, and are considered separate aircraft families. I have condensed the timeline, reusing rows as much as possible, while ensuring that they are still in size order. The A310 and A320neo being on the same line is not a problem, as they were not in production at the same time, and there has never been a size variant between them (as long as they are on the same line and not A320 below A310 it is fine). Likewise for A300 and A330neo. The A330neo is above the A330, which does not matter as they are the same size. Sr88, talk. 17:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]