Talk:Winkler County nurse whistleblower case

Winkler County nurse whistleblower case received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Winkler County nurse whistleblower case has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 23, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Winkler County nurse whistleblower case appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 November 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the events leading to the Winkler County nurse whistleblower case occurred at a 15-bed hospital in Kermit, Texas? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winkler County nurse whistleblower case.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Nursing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Ethics / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics Contemporary philosophy United States: Texas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:Winkler County nurse whistleblower case/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 1ST7 (talk · contribs) 23:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this nomination. Initial comments should be posted soon. --1ST7 (talk) 23:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the review:

1. Well-written
   • "Protection from prosecution was built into Texas whistleblower laws." Maybe "incorporated into" would be a better way to phrase it?

• Fixed. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 05:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. • The lead says that the complaint was submitted in 2008, but the rest of the article says it was in 2009. As the latter seems to be correct, can you please make the lead consistent with the other text?

• Good catch. Was definitely '09 because some of the alleged misconduct in the complaint occurred that year. Fixed. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 05:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. • "The board noted that it received 6,849 complaints in 2010." Wikipedia:Words to watch discourages using the word "note" or any of its variants as a synonym for "said". Can you please reword?

• Thanks for the reminder. I am bad about this one. I just went with "the board received" if that's okay. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 05:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. • Please mention Mitchell and Galle's termination of employment before the aftermath section, if possible.

• Done. Changed the title of the Arrests and criminal charges section, reworded some stuff and added a couple of sources to that section. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 05:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Verifiable with no original research:
2. Broad in its coverage:
3. Neutral:
4. Stable:
5. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

As a whole, this article looks close to ready for promotion to GA status. I will put it on hold for a week to give you time to address these issues. Thanks for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 03:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your prompt review. I believe I've addressed the above. Let me know if I can do anything else. Again, I appreciate your help. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 05:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. The article looks good to go now, so I'm passing it. Congratulations, and thanks again for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 06:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]