Talk:Whale Research Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Newfoundland & Labrador Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador. Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Marine life Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Marine life To do: edit history watch purge Have a look at the Marine life WikiProject and sign up. Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by The Marine life Wikiproject: Collaboration of the week: Marine life article assessment Other: See the projects page Images: Upload any non-copyrighted marine life images to Wikimedia Commons Featured Articles/Good Articles: Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because, in my opinion, the nomination misreads criterion A10 because the page that is duplicated is not in article space. This article duplicates a draft that is pending review. It is my opinion that A10 should not be used for an article that duplicates a draft. --Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whale Research Group

I have reviewed the references for this article. This is a close call as to meeting general notability or organizational notability. Most of the references are about the founder, or are passing mentions. My opinion is that there is enough significant coverage, but that one or two more high-quality sources would be a good idea.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :::@Robert McClenon,

I have added more citations from the Osprey Nature Journal to the article, which should contribute to hopefully enough sufficient coverage through citations.

One question I have for you is do you think the citations I have for the information I've already written is OK, and I just need more information with other sources with significant coverage, or is it that the information I already have needs to be referenced with better sources?

Also, wrt the table analyzing my references, I noticed no information was added no.10, the Entanglements book published by the University Press of Florida. I am citing a physical copy of the book, and I don't believe the full text is available for free online, but in it, Johnson writes in detail about the entrapment assistance program, so I believe it has significant coverage.

Again I appreciate the help here and in the Tea House, I saw your most recent comment.

Tyroneslothrop00000 (talk) 20:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]