Talk:The Call-Girls

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Perhaps why they are called Call-girls could be explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.244.80.133 (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oniii

Oniiiiii (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Oniiiiii (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Call-Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141225211155/http://liberreview.blogspot.com/2010/08/call-girls-arthur-koestler.html to http://liberreview.blogspot.com/2010/08/call-girls-arthur-koestler.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the text giving the publication date as 1 January 1972: this was probably taken from an online source whose software defaults to 00-00-1972 when only the year is entered. I have a Second impression of the First edition dated on the Copyright page December 1972 which also states "First published October 1972". I couldn't get the 'cite book' template to work so have entered the reference details manually – feel free to rejig them. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.205.82.82 (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]